You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 8, Issue 4
  • Efficacy of rectus femoris stretching on pain, range of motion and spatiotemporal gait parameters in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomised controlled trial

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Original research
Efficacy of rectus femoris stretching on pain, range of motion and spatiotemporal gait parameters in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomised controlled trial
  1. Mohamed Hussein ElGendy1,
  2. Mostafa Mahmoud Zalabia1,
  3. Ashraf Nehad Moharram2,
  4. Mohamed Ibrahim Abdelhay1
  1. 1Department of Basic Sciences, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
  2. 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
  1. Correspondence to Dr Mohamed Hussein ElGendy; prof.mgendy{at}hotmail.com

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of rectus femoris stretching on pain intensity, knee range of motion (ROM), spatiotemporal gait parameters and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

Methods This parallel group, single-blinded randomised controlled trial was conducted in two outpatient physical therapy clinics. Study participants (n=60, with age>45 years) with mild-to-moderate bilateral KOA were randomised into the study group (SG) and control group (CG). SG received rectus femoris stretching exercises together with stretching exercises of the calf, hamstring and iliotibial band, strength exercises for the quadriceps, gluteus medius, gluteus maximus and calf muscles, whereas, the CG received all exercises mentioned for SG except rectus femoris stretching. Pain intensity, ROM, spatiotemporal gait parameters and function were measured before and after 4 weeks of treatment.

Results The SG showed a significant improvement in the visual analogue scale, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities measure and ROM (p<0.001). The SG also had a significantly greater step length and speed than CG (p<0.001). Extension ROM did not significant difference between the groups (p>0.05).

Conclusion Simple rectus femoris stretching exercises are easy to perform even at home and are beneficial for pain, flexion ROM, function and spatiotemporal gait parameters, such as step length and speed, in KOA patients if the compliance with the exercise regimen is good.

Trial registration number Pan African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR202003828737019.

  • Osteoarthritis
  • Exercise rehabilitation
  • Knee injuries
  • Gait analysis

Data availability statement

Data are available upon reasonable request.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2022-001459

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC

    • Patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) experience a steady decrease in knee joint range of motion (ROM) over time and reduced knee ROM has been linked to the development of KOA, progression of pre-existing cartilage deficiencies and early joint arthroplasty.

    • To improve joint mobility, stability and physical function, various exercise therapies such as strengthening, ROM and stretching exercises have been performed.

    WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

    • For optimal knee osteoarthritis care, muscle-specific stretching exercises are recommended.

    • Rectus femoris stretching exercise improved pain, flexion ROM, function and spatiotemporal gait parameters, such as step length and speed, in KOA patients.

    HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICY

    • Rectus femoris stretching exercise can modify and normalise movement patterns in gait among the elderly to resemble healthy adults.

    • The study provides data that can serve as a basis for setting up controlled studies on other types of arthritis.

    Introduction

    Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most prevalent forms of debilitating joint illness that affects around 60% of those over the age of 50.1 2 The common symptoms of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) include pain, muscular weakness, joint stiffness and limited range of motion (ROM), which make daily tasks difficult and impair functional capacity.3 Evidence has shown that patients with KOA had worse spatiotemporal gait characteristics, such as slower walking speed and shorter steps, with the former being associated with an increased risk of mortality in KOA.4 5

    KOA is caused by aberrant mechanical loads, which cause gradual articular cartilage degradation.6 Muscle forces play a significant role in knee joint loading.7 Although quadriceps and hamstring co-contraction improves knee joint stabilisation, it also increases knee loading, which has been linked to increased medial contact forces and cartilage volume loss on the medial side.8 Loss of joint ROM can also hasten cartilage deterioration due to high hydrostatic pressures in the area, resulting in chondrocyte death and subsequent cartilage degradation.9

    Previous research has found that unlike healthy people, those with KOA experience a steady decrease in knee joint ROM over time.10 Reduced knee ROM has been linked to the development of KOA, progression of pre-existing cartilage deficiencies and early joint arthroplasty.11 12

    Another study found that patients with KOA have lower muscular flexibility around the knee joint compared with healthy people, with quadriceps muscle flexibility being the most affected.13 Reduced quadriceps flexibility could be a sign of reversible soft-tissue alterations linked to decreased knee flexion and extension, which could be improved by stretching exercises.14

    To improve joint mobility, stability and physical function, various exercise therapies such as strengthening, ROM and stretching exercises have been performed.15 A recent systematic review recommended specific muscles that should be stretched for optimal KOA care.16

    Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate the efficacy of rectus femoris stretching exercises together with stretching exercises of the calf, hamstring and iliotibial band, strength exercises for the quadriceps, gluteus medius, gluteus maximus and calf muscles on pain intensity, ROM of the knee, spatiotemporal gait parameters and function in patients with KOA.

    Materials and methods

    Study design, setting and participants

    Between January 2021 and August 2021, a single-blinded, pretest and post-test randomised controlled study was undertaken. It enrolled 60 patients with mild-to-moderate KOA from Elkasr El-ainy and the Faculty of Physical Therapy outpatient clinics in Egypt. G*POWER statistical software (V.3.1.9.2) was used to calculate the sample size based on visual analogue scale (VAS) data from pilot research with five patients per group. Accordingly, our calculation found that a sample size of 26 subjects for each group was needed for this investigation. Calculations were conducted using an α value of 0.05, power of 80% and effect size of 0.8. The actual number of individuals was increased to 30 for each group to account for probable dropouts.

    Before enrolling in the study, the subjects were evaluated based on the established eligibility criteria and signed a written consent form. Patients over 45 years old with bilateral KOA and who satisfied the clinical standards of the American College of Rheumatology were eligible to participate.17 Recent radiographs confirmed the presence of knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) Scale grade II–III).18 Their body mass index (BMI) was <33 kg/m2, whereas their pain severity was at least 20 mm on a 100 mm VAS, along with a positive finding on Ely’s test for rectus femoris tightness.19 The exclusion criteria included severe OA, joint replacement surgery, systemic arthritic diseases, rheumatoid arthritis and lumbar radiculopathy.

    Based on the eligibility criteria, 72 patients with KOA were identified and requested to participate in this study. We then excluded 12 patients, of whom 6 did not satisfy the inclusion criteria, 4 refused participation and 2 for other reasons. Thus, the 60 remaining patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: group I (the study group (SG)) and group II (the control group (CG)) (figure 1). To ensure concealment of allocation, eligibility was determined by a blinded physiotherapist not involved in the randomisation process. The randomisation sequence was drawn up and kept off-site by a statistician who was not aware of the study aims, using a random number generator. The sequence of subjects included in the SG or CG was mailed by the statistician to the recruiter.

    Figure 1
    Figure 1

    Participant recruitment flowchart.

    Intervention

    The participants underwent three exercise sessions per week for 4 weeks. Both groups perform warming up exercises and received a 15 min hot pack treatment first. The CG performed calf, hamstring and iliotibial band stretching exercises, as well as quadriceps, gluteus medius, gluteus maximus and calf muscular strength exercises. The SG performed rectus femoris stretching exercises, as well as the exercises performed in group CG.20

    During rectus femoris stretching, participants were positioned on their side, with the stretched leg on top. The bottom leg’s hip and knee were bent. One therapist’s hand was placed across the anterior portion of the distal thigh of the leg being stretched, while another therapist’s hand was placed over the iliac crest. The therapist performed hip hyperextension with full knee flexion until the subject felt a stretch in the anterior area of the thigh.20

    In the course of calf stretching, participants were placed in the supine position. The therapist’s forearm was positioned along the plantar surface of the foot, while the other hand held the subject’s heel (calcaneus). The subject’s ankle was dorsiflexed by the therapist, drawing the calcaneus in an inferior direction, with the thumb and fingers and exerting pressure and the forearm in a superior direction proximal to the heads of the metatarsals until the calf muscles were stretched.20

    Throughout hamstring stretching, the subjects were placed in the supine position. The distal half of the leg to be stretched was gripped by one therapist’s hand, while the anterior side of the thigh was grasped by the second therapist’s hand to keep the knee in the extended position. The hip was flexed in a straight leg lift position, while retaining the hip in a neutral position until the patient felt a stretch discomfort in the hamstrings.20

    During iliotibial band stretching, the subjects were positioned lying on their side with their hip to be stretched uppermost. The subjects’ hip was moved until slight hyperextension was achieved, after which the therapist’s hand applied pressure over the lateral aspect of the distal thigh until the patient felt a slight stretch discomfort.20

    At the time of hip abductor strengthening exercises, the subjects were positioned side laying with their bottom leg hip and knee in flexion. Their upper leg was actively abducted while in slight extension with no rotation at the hip.20

    In the course of hip extensor strengthening, subjects were placed in the prone position with a pillow beneath their abdomen. With the knee extended, the leg was actively elevated.

    Subjects were seated in a lengthy sitting position with their knee extended during static quadriceps contraction. They were told to statically contract their quadriceps and push their knees down without causing pain.20

    At the time of straight leg rising, participants were lying down with one knee extended and the other flexed, they were requested to contract their quadriceps first and then lift their leg to 45°–60° of hip flexion with their knee extended.2

    For short arc knee extension, subjects were placed in the supine position with the exercising leg resting on a roll with the knee flexed up to 45°. They were then instructed to extend the knee.20 Participants were instructed to keep their leg in place for 5–10 s before lowering it to the resting position. The exercise was then repeated with a weight cuff affixed to the leg above the ankle joint.

    Subjects were requested to do a partial squat by tightening the quadriceps and gluteal muscles while maintaining the knees centred over their feet and returning to the standing posture thereafter.21

    Outcome measurements

    All outcomes were assessed by independent assessors who were blinded to participant allocation. Pain intensity assessment was measured by using a VAS. The score was based on the intensity of pain, with 0 mm representing no discomfort and 100 mm representing the highest degree of pain intensity. This current study used the VAS to determine the exact intensity of pain that participants experienced in their daily lives.22 Bijur et al and Boonstra et al confirmed the validity and reliability of the scale to study pain intensity.23 24

    Knee ROM assessment was assessed by using a standard Universal goniometer. An independent outcome assessor was recruited to assess knee ROM of the patients. During ROM of extension, the Universal goniometer was positioned so that the goniometer axis rested over the lateral epicondyle of the femur. The stationary goniometer arm was aligned parallel to the longitudinal axis of the femur, aligned with the greater trochanter, while the mobile arm was placed parallel to the longitudinal axis of the fibula, aligned with the lateral malleolus. When the examiner was satisfied, they had completed the measurement, the therapist documented the results.25 While, during ROM of flexion, patients were requested to lie prone, with extended knee; patients were asked to bring the heel of the tested leg as close as possible to the buttock while the other foot remained in contact with the plinth. The fulcrum of the goniometry on the lateral epicondyle of the femur of the tested knee with one arm in line with the lateral malleolus and the other arm in line with the greater trochanter, after which the therapist documented the results.25

    The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Scale was used to measure physical function assessment. The Arabic WOMAC Index has been confirmed to be a valid and accurate tool for assessing knee OA function. The 24-item questionnaire is divided into three subdimensions, namely pain, stiffness and physical function. By summing the points from the three subscales, the overall score can be determined. WOMAC scores were based on the severity of symptoms and varied from 0 to 96 points (best to worst).26

    Salaffi et al confirmed the validity and reliability of WOMAC Scale to measure physical function assessment.27

    During the Spatiotemporal gait parameters assessment (6 m walk test), each person was given 10 m to walk at a normal speed. From the second to the eighth metre, the time spent walking was counted by stopwatch in seconds because the initial 2 m (acceleration) and last 2 m (deceleration) were not calculated.28

    Finally, step length (cm) was estimated using a standard Biodex Gait Trainer 2 (Model 950-380, software V.2.6x, New York, USA). This is a specially built treadmill that includes a screen for evaluating and training walking abilities in people with gait disabilities. The velocity was gradually increased to a suitable level for every patient to begin the evaluation process. Individuals were given 3 min to walk continuously before the assessment concluded, with the treadmill gradually slowing until completely stopping, after which the results were recorded.29

    Data analysis

    All data were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. The independent sample t-test was used to analyse the participants’ characteristics between the groups. To ensure that the groups were homogeneous, Levene’s test for homogeneity of variances was used. Pain, ROM, function and spatiotemporal gait characteristics were compared within and between groups using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). For multiple comparisons, the Bonferroni correction was used for post-hoc testing. Data were analysed using statistical software for social sciences (SPSS) V.25 for Windows. The significance level was set at p<0.05 for all statistical analyses.

    Results

    This study included 60 participants with KOA. The age, weight, height, BMI, KL Classification and sex distribution of the participants did not significantly differ between groups (p>0.05; table 1), so the groups were well matched at entry level.

    View this table:
    Table 1

    Participants’ characteristics

    Within group comparisons

    A significant treatment and time interaction was found on pain, ROM and spatiotemporal gait parameters after the intervention (p<0.001). In both groups, the post-treatment VAS and WOMAC scores were significantly higher than the pretreatment (p<0.001; table 2). Similarly, both groups’ post-treatment flexion and extension ROM showed significantly higher scores than the pretreatment (p>0.001; table 3). Moreover, groups I and II displayed significant greater step length and speed after than before treatment (p<0.001; table 4).

    View this table:
    Table 2

    Mean VAS and WOMAC before and after treatment in groups I and II

    View this table:
    Table 3

    Mean knee ROM before and after treatment between groups I and II

    View this table:
    Table 4

    Mean STGP before and after treatment in groups I and II

    Between-group comparisons

    Before treatment, no significant difference in any of the measures was observed between the two groups (p>0.05). After the treatment, however, group I had significantly lower VAS and WOMAC scores compared with group II (VAS; MD=59.16, 95% CI, p>0.001, ES=0.91 (91%); WOMAC; MD=41.5, 95% CI, p<0.001, ES=0.96 (96%); table 2).

    Group I had a significantly higher flexion ROM compared with group II (flexion of right side; MD = −26.87, 95% CI, p>0.001, ES=0.89 (89%); flexion of left side; MD=−26.54, 95% CI, p<0.001, ES=0.93 (93%). However, no significant difference in extension ROM was observed between both groups (p>0.05; table 3). A significant difference in step length and speed was noted between groups I and II (p<0.001; table 4).

    Discussion

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of rectus femoris stretching on pain intensity, knee ROM, spatiotemporal gait parameters and function in patients with KOA. The main findings of the study confirm that the SG (those who performed rectus femoris stretching) show significantly better improvement in VAS, WOMAC, flexion ROM, step length and speed in comparison to CG. However, no significant difference in the extension ROM was observed between the two groups.

    Previous study on patients with early symptomatic KOA found a link between limited knee ROM and osteophyte growth, crepitus and discomfort.30 Another study found a link between pain and knee flexion.31 Meanwhile, the current study found that rectus femoris stretching improved pain and function in KOA. Previous research has shown that stretching exercises can help reduce pain among people with musculoskeletal problems by lowering muscle tension and improving joint metabolism.32

    The current study supports a recent systematic review, which showed that stretching exercises on their own could adequately reduce pain in KOA patients.16 The findings of obtained herein may support a previous study’s notion that stretching exercise reduces discomfort experienced during passive extension or flexion, which could indicate reversible soft-tissue changes rather than bone alterations.33

    To avoid pain, patients with KOA prefer to avoid physical activity, which leads to periarticular connective tissue fibrosis due to immobilisation or inactivity.34 Mobility requires various degrees of knee flexion. Accordingly, walking on a flat surface requires a minimum of 70° of knee flexion, whereas climbing stairs, rising from a seated position and squatting required 83°, 93° and 120° of knee flexion, respectively. A previous study established an association between ROM and impairment, with their findings showing that reduced mobility within joints, particularly flexion of the knee, was an integral key part of disability in KOA.35

    Our findings showed that rectus femoris stretching increased flexion ROM. Stretching exercises may increase ROM by raising the pain threshold, stretch tolerance and sarcomere numbers.36–38 The current results support the findings of Suzuki’s research, which showed that improving joint flexibility and multiple muscle strength was more important than increasing quadriceps strength alone.39 The current study also supports Chow et al’s study, which showed that 2 weeks of stretching, was beneficial for total knee arthroplasty patients given that it improved ROM and postoperative outcomes.40

    Evidence has shown that a walking speed increase exceeding 0.1 m/s can be considered clinically significant.41 In the current study, rectus femoris stretching increased walking speed by 0.28 m/s. Step length and cadence are the factors that determine walking speed.42 As expected, the experimental group displayed an increase in walking speed considering that stretching may reduce hip flexor muscle tightness, which limits hip joint extension and causes anterior pelvic tilt.43

    The increase in step length may be attributed to the increased ROM during knee flexion, hip and pelvic motion, which has been considered the key for increasing walking velocity after stretching.37 Given the increased ROM around the pelvis, the swinging leg may be able to contact the ground with the heel further in front of the body.37 The findings obtained in the current study agree with those presented in a previous study, which showed that stretching exercises can modify and normalise movement patterns in gait among the elderly to resemble healthy adults.44

    In conclusion, simple rectus femoris stretching exercises are easy to perform even at home and are beneficial for pain, flexion ROM, function and spatiotemporal gait parameters, such as step length and speed, in KOA patients if the compliance with the exercise regimen is good.

    Data availability statement

    Data are available upon reasonable request.

    Ethics statements

    Patient consent for publication

    Ethics approval

    This study involves human participants and was approved by the faculty of physical therapy’s ethical committee, Cairo University, Egypt. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.

    Acknowledgments

    We would like to acknowledge the study participants.

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Cross M,
      2. Smith E,
      3. Hoy D, et al
      . The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:1323–30.doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204763pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24553908
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    2. ↵
      1. Lawrence RC,
      2. Helmick CG,
      3. Arnett FC, et al
      . Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States. Arthritis Rheum 1998;41:778–99.doi:10.1002/1529-0131(199805)41:5&lt;778::AID-ART4&gt;3.0.CO;2-Vpmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9588729
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    3. ↵
      1. Liikavainio T,
      2. Lyytinen T,
      3. Tyrväinen E, et al
      . Physical function and properties of quadriceps femoris muscle in men with knee osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:2185–94.doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.04.012pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18996249
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    4. ↵
      1. Debi R,
      2. Mor A,
      3. Segal G, et al
      . Differences in gait pattern parameters between medial and anterior knee pain in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Clin Biomech 2012;27:584–7.doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2012.02.002pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22406298
      OpenUrlPubMed
    5. ↵
      1. Master H,
      2. Neogi T,
      3. Callahan LF, et al
      . The association between walking speed from short- and standard-distance tests with the risk of all-cause mortality among adults with radiographic knee osteoarthritis: data from three large United States cohort studies. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2020;28:1551–8.doi:10.1016/j.joca.2020.08.009pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32861851
      OpenUrlPubMed
    6. ↵
      1. Henao-Murillo L,
      2. Ito K,
      3. van Donkelaar CC
      . Collagen damage location in articular cartilage differs if damage is caused by excessive loading magnitude or rate. Ann Biomed Eng 2018;46:605–15.doi:10.1007/s10439-018-1986-xpmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29423727
      OpenUrlPubMed
    7. ↵
      1. Winby CR,
      2. Lloyd DG,
      3. Besier TF, et al
      . Muscle and external load contribution to knee joint contact loads during normal gait. J Biomech 2009;42:2294–300.doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.06.019pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19647257
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    8. ↵
      1. Walter JP,
      2. D'Lima DD,
      3. Colwell CW, et al
      . Decreased knee adduction moment does not guarantee decreased medial contact force during gait. J Orthop Res 2010;28:1348–54.doi:10.1002/jor.21142pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20839320
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    9. ↵
      1. Nakamura S,
      2. Arai Y,
      3. Takahashi KA, et al
      . Hydrostatic pressure induces apoptosis of chondrocytes cultured in alginate beads. J Orthop Res 2006;24:733–9.doi:10.1002/jor.20077pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16514637
      OpenUrlPubMed
    10. ↵
      1. Dekker J,
      2. van Dijk GM,
      3. Veenhof C
      . Risk factors for functional decline in osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2009;21:520–4.doi:10.1097/BOR.0b013e32832e6eaapmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19550331
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    11. ↵
      1. Shelbourne KD,
      2. Urch SE,
      3. Gray T, et al
      . Loss of normal knee motion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with radiographic arthritic changes after surgery. Am J Sports Med 2012;40:108–13.doi:10.1177/0363546511423639pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21989129
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    12. ↵
      1. Zeni JA,
      2. Axe MJ,
      3. Snyder-Mackler L
      . Clinical predictors of elective total joint replacement in persons with end-stage knee osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010;11:1–8.doi:10.1186/1471-2474-11-86
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    13. ↵
      1. Jyoti SJ,
      2. Yadav VS
      . Knee joint muscle flexibility in knee osteoarthritis patients and healthy individuals. Int J Health Sci Res 2019;9:156–63.
      OpenUrl
    14. ↵
      1. Hilfiker R,
      2. Jüni P,
      3. Nüesch E, et al
      . Association of radiographic osteoarthritis, pain on passive movement and knee range of motion: a cross-sectional study. Man Ther 2015;20:361–5.doi:10.1016/j.math.2014.11.014
      OpenUrlPubMed
    15. ↵
      1. Nahayatbin M,
      2. Ghasemi M,
      3. Rahimi A, et al
      . The effects of routine physiotherapy alone and in combination with either tai chi or closed kinetic chain exercises on knee osteoarthritis: a comparative clinical trial study. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2018;20.doi:10.5812/ircmj.62600
    16. ↵
      1. Luan L,
      2. El-Ansary D,
      3. Adams R, et al
      . Knee osteoarthritis pain and stretching exercises: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy 2022;114:16–29.doi:10.1016/j.physio.2021.10.001pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35091326
      OpenUrlPubMed
    17. ↵
      1. Altman R,
      2. Asch E,
      3. Bloch D, et al
      . Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis & Rheumatism 1986;29:1039–49.doi:10.1002/art.1780290816
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    18. ↵
      1. Kellgren JH,
      2. Lawrence JS
      . Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957;16:494–502.doi:10.1136/ard.16.4.494pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13498604
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    19. ↵
      1. Peeler J,
      2. Anderson JE
      . Reliability of the Ely's test for assessing rectus femoris muscle flexibility and joint range of motion. J Orthop Res 2008;26:793–9.doi:10.1002/jor.20556pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18186129
      OpenUrlPubMed
    20. ↵
      1. Singh S,
      2. Pattnaik M,
      3. Mohanty P, et al
      . Effectiveness of hip abductor strengthening on health status, strength, endurance and six minute walk test in participants with medial compartment symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2016;29:65–75.doi:10.3233/BMR-150599pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26406217
      OpenUrlPubMed
    21. ↵
      1. Foroughi N,
      2. Smith RM,
      3. Lange AK, et al
      . Lower limb muscle strengthening does not change frontal plane moments in women with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Biomech 2011;26:167–74.doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.08.011pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20888096
      OpenUrlPubMed
    22. ↵
      1. Concoff A,
      2. Rosen J,
      3. Fu F, et al
      . A comparison of treatment effects for nonsurgical therapies and the minimum clinically important difference in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. JBJS Rev 2019;7:e5.doi:10.2106/JBJS.RVW.18.00150pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31415278
      OpenUrlPubMed
    23. ↵
      1. Bijur PE,
      2. Silver W,
      3. Gallagher EJ
      . Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med 2001;8:1153–7.doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01132.xpmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11733293
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    24. ↵
      1. Boonstra AM,
      2. Schiphorst Preuper HR,
      3. Reneman MF, et al
      . Reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale for disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Int J Rehabil Res 2008;31:165–9.doi:10.1097/MRR.0b013e3282fc0f93pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18467932
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    25. ↵
      1. Gerhardt JJ,
      2. Rondinelli RD
      . Goniometric techniques for Range-of-Motion assessment. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2001;12:507–28.doi:10.1016/S1047-9651(18)30047-0
      OpenUrlPubMed
    26. ↵
      1. Alghadir A,
      2. Anwer S,
      3. Iqbal ZA, et al
      . Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Arabic version of the reduced Western Ontario and McMaster universities osteoarthritis index in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Disabil Rehabil 2016;38:689–94.doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1055380pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26066566
      OpenUrlPubMed
    27. ↵
      1. Salaffi F,
      2. Leardini G,
      3. Canesi B, et al
      . Reliability and validity of the Western Ontario and McMaster universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis index in Italian patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2003;11:551–60.doi:10.1016/S1063-4584(03)00089-Xpmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12880577
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    28. ↵
      1. Roush J,
      2. Heick J,
      3. Hawk T, et al
      . Agreement in walking speed measured using four different outcome measures: 6-Meter walk test, 10-Meter walk test, 2-minute walk test, and 6-minute walk test. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice 2021;19:7.doi:10.46743/1540-580X/2021.1971
      OpenUrl
    29. ↵
      1. Park J
      . Effects of repetitive sit to stand training on the knee extensor strength and walking ability in subject with total knee replacement patients. The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy 2021;33:34–9.doi:10.18857/jkpt.2021.33.1.34
      OpenUrl
    30. ↵
      1. Holla JFM,
      2. Steultjens MPM,
      3. van der Leeden M, et al
      . Determinants of range of joint motion in patients with early symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hip and/or knee: an exploratory study in the check cohort. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011;19:411–9.doi:10.1016/j.joca.2011.01.013pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21272657
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    31. ↵
      1. Bennett DA,
      2. Hanratty BR,
      3. Thompson NE
      . The influence of pain on knee motion in patients with osteoarthritis undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2009;32 orthosupersite-com
    32. ↵
      1. Lee J-H,
      2. Gak HB
      . Effects of self stretching on pain and musculoskeletal symptom of bus drivers. J Phys Ther Sci 2014;26:1911–4.doi:10.1589/jpts.26.1911pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25540496
      OpenUrlPubMed
    33. ↵
      1. Hilfiker R,
      2. Jüni P,
      3. Nüesch E, et al
      . Association of radiographic osteoarthritis, pain on passive movement and knee range of motion: a cross-sectional study. Man Ther 2015;20:361–5.doi:10.1016/j.math.2014.11.014pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25529190
      OpenUrlPubMed
    34. ↵
      1. Ferreira de Meneses SR,
      2. Hunter DJ,
      3. Young Docko E, et al
      . Effect of low-level laser therapy (904 nm) and static stretching in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a protocol of randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015;16:1–9.doi:10.1186/s12891-015-0709-9
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    35. ↵
      1. Steultjens MP,
      2. Dekker J,
      3. van Baar ME, et al
      . Range of joint motion and disability in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip. Rheumatology 2000;39:955–61.doi:10.1093/rheumatology/39.9.955pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10986299
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    36. ↵
      1. Magnusson SP,
      2. Simonsen EB,
      3. Aagaard P, et al
      . Viscoelastic response to repeated static stretching in the human hamstring muscle. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1995;5:342–7.doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.1995.tb00056.xpmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8775718
      OpenUrlPubMed
    37. ↵
      1. Magnusson SP,
      2. Simonsen EB,
      3. Aagaard P, et al
      . A mechanism for altered flexibility in human skeletal muscle. J Physiol 1996;497 (Pt 1):291–8.doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021768pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8951730
      OpenUrlPubMed
    38. ↵
      1. Caplan N,
      2. Rogers R,
      3. Parr MK, et al
      . The effect of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and static stretch training on running mechanics. J Strength Cond Res 2009;23:1175–80.doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e318199d6f6pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19528850
      OpenUrlPubMed
    39. ↵
      1. Suzuki Y,
      2. Iijima H,
      3. Tashiro Y, et al
      . Home exercise therapy to improve muscle strength and joint flexibility effectively treats pre-radiographic knee oa in community-dwelling elderly: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rheumatol 2019;38:133–41.doi:10.1007/s10067-018-4263-3pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30167975
      OpenUrlPubMed
    40. ↵
      1. Chow TPY,
      2. Ng GYF
      . Active, passive and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching are comparable in improving the knee flexion range in people with total knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2010;24:911–8.doi:10.1177/0269215510367992pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20685725
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    41. ↵
      1. Chui K,
      2. Hood E,
      3. Klima D
      . Meaningful change in walking speed. Top Geriatr Rehabil 2012;28:97–103.doi:10.1097/TGR.0b013e3182510195
      OpenUrlCrossRef
    42. ↵
      1. Zakas A,
      2. Balaska P,
      3. Grammatikopoulou MG, et al
      . Acute effects of stretching duration on the range of motion of elderly women. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2005;9:270–6.doi:10.1016/j.jbmt.2004.10.006
      OpenUrl
    43. ↵
      1. Rose J,
      2. Gamble JG
      . Human walking. 3rd edn. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.
    44. ↵
      1. Rodacki ALF,
      2. Souza RM,
      3. Ugrinowitsch C, et al
      . Transient effects of stretching exercises on gait parameters of elderly women. Man Ther 2009;14:167–72.doi:10.1016/j.math.2008.01.006pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18314375
      OpenUrlPubMed

    Footnotes

    • Contributors Concept, supervision and literature research—MHE. Resources and financial support—MMZ and MIA. Materials, data collection and/or processing and writing manuscript—MMZ. Analysis and/or interpretation—ANM and MIA. Critical review—ANM. Guarantor—MHE.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.