Materials and methods
Data on height, weight, broad jump, grip strength, 20 m shuttle run and throwing and catching skills were collected by the same research team using standardised techniques in adolescents aged 13–14 years (UK Year 9) over 6 years from 2014 to 2019. A representative sample of three schools from the Oxfordshire region were contacted, covering a broad socioeconomic demographic, and were enrolled in the study, with formal consent from the head teacher. Measurements were carried out as part of enhanced PE lessons at the schools. These lessons formed part of the screening process to recruit participants into three clinical studies (Exploring the Impact and Feasibility of a Pathway to Sport and Long-term Participation in Young People (EPIC; NCT02517333), The Rhythmic Motor Learning in Children with Developmental Coordination Disorders (EPIC2; NCT03150784) and the Oxfordshire Sedentariness, Obesity and Cardiometabolic Risk in Adolescents—A Trial of Exercise in Schools (OxSOCRATES; NCT04118543)). These studies involved public input at the design, conduct and dissemination stages.
Setting
Each school sent a comprehensive information sheet, prepared by the research team and reviewed by the relevant ethics board, to all parents. The schools were custodians of the data and the parents or guardians were asked by their school to complete a form if they objected to their child’s anonymised data being analysed by the research team (opt-out informed consent). The average opt-out across all three schools was <5%.
Participants
All students were enrolled in Year 9 at the start of the academic year of 2014 or each subsequent year until 2019. Exclusion criteria consisted of any known medical conditions that could explain deficits in movement or the inability to participate in general PA. These included pathology in cognitive, neurological, musculoskeletal, behavioural or visual function. This was screened using a Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire.20
Procedure
Data collection took place in each school’s sports hall during timetabled PE lessons. Each exercise measure was set up at individual stations and the students rotated between them in groups of 4–5. Each station was controlled by an experienced researcher from Oxford Brookes University, with each session supervised by two PE teachers from the school. Not all measurements were carried out at each time point. Data were not collected for the 20 m shuttle run, the ball catching task and grip strength in 2014. Furthermore, there were no broad jump data in 2018.
Measures
Height and weight were measured with a portable Harpenden Stadiometer (Holtain, Crymych, UK) and a SECA medical 770 digital floor scale (SECA, Hamburg, Germany), respectively. Participants were dressed in light sports clothing and were instructed to remove their shoes. Height and weight were used to calculate body mass index (BMI), which is presented as age and sex-independent z-scores (WHO).21 A battery of health-related fitness (HRF) measures was then assessed, including grip strength, broad jump, CRF and MC.
Grip strength was used as a proxy of total muscle strength as they are strongly correlated in adolescents.22 The Takei TKK 5001 hand-held dynamometer (P&A Medical, Chorley, UK) was used to evaluate the highest grip strength from a maximum of three attempts. Each participant was instructed to squeeze the dynamometer as hard as possible, while they were in a standing position with their elbow fully extended and their arm resting comfortably by their side.
Power was measured using the broad jump, as it has been strongly correlated with a one-repetition maximal leg extension test.23 Participants were instructed to stand with both feet behind a marked line and jump as far as possible, landing with their feet together. The longest jump out of two attempts was recorded.
CRF was measured using the 20 m shuttle run test.24 25 Participants were instructed to run back and forth between two markers that were 20 m apart. The time required to run between each marker became shorter as the test progressed, requiring participants to run faster. The participants were verbally encouraged to produce a maximal effort and were withdrawn from the test when they failed to reach the marker within the allotted time on three consecutive occasions, or they withdrew from the test themselves. The total number of shuttles that they achieved was recorded as their score.
Over the study period, two very similar throwing and catching tasks were used to assess upper limb MC. The first was the alternate hand ball toss.26 In this, each participant threw a tennis ball in an underarm action against a wall and attempted to catch it with the opposite hand. The number of successful catches in 30 s was recorded. The second was the ‘catching with one hand’ measure from the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 age band 3 (11–16 years).27 28 In this, each participant threw a tennis ball with one hand at a wall and attempted to catch it with the same hand. The number of successful catches, out of 10 attempts for each hand, was recorded. Although these two assessments differ slightly in their difficulty, they are highly correlated. Therefore, their rank order would be expected to be similar or the same in most populations. On this basis, we converted each measure to their z-scores (SD score) so that rank order could be compared between these groups.
The total number of hours dedicated to teaching PE was collected from the UK Annual School Workforce Census.29 In this census, all state (UK)-funded secondary schools reported the total hours of PE lessons taught each year to students from year 7 to year 13 (11–17 years old).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using STATA (V.16.1, StataCorp, College Station, Texas). All data were found to be normally distributed on visual inspection of histogram plots. Little’s missing completely at random (MCAR) test was used to assess the missingness of the data.30 Independent t-tests were used to assess the difference in HRF measures between sexes. Linear regressions were performed to assess the temporal trends of each HRF measure. These relationships were also assessed for interactions with fitness and BMI z-score over time. Each model was adjusted for school31 and sex because school catchment areas differed by Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD).32 Grip strength, broad jump and ball catching were all additionally adjusted for height to account for inherent advantages of greater physical size in these measures. CRF was split into low (30 shuttles), medium (50 shuttles) and high (70 shuttles) tertiles, and BMI categories were determined by WHO thresholds (<1 z-score=normal weight, ≥1 to 2 z-scores=overweight and >2 z-scores=obese). Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.
Patient and public involvement
Patients and/or the public were involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.