Multiple imputation for missing data

Res Nurs Health. 2002 Feb;25(1):76-84. doi: 10.1002/nur.10015.

Abstract

Missing data occur frequently in survey and longitudinal research. Incomplete data are problematic, particularly in the presence of substantial absent information or systematic nonresponse patterns. Listwise deletion and mean imputation are the most common techniques to reconcile missing data. However, more recent techniques may improve parameter estimates, standard errors, and test statistics. The purpose of this article is to review the problems associated with missing data, options for handling missing data, and recent multiple imputation methods. It informs researchers' decisions about whether to delete or impute missing responses and the method best suited to doing so. An empirical investigation of AIDS care data outcomes illustrates the process of multiple imputation.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome / nursing
  • Bias
  • Data Collection / methods*
  • Data Collection / standards
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical*
  • Humans
  • Least-Squares Analysis
  • Logistic Models
  • Longitudinal Studies
  • Nursing Research / methods*
  • Nursing Research / standards
  • Nursing Staff, Hospital / supply & distribution
  • Personnel Staffing and Scheduling / statistics & numerical data
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Research Design* / standards
  • Software
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Workload