Skip to main content
Log in

The Pleasure and Displeasure People Feel When they Exercise at Different Intensities

Decennial Update and Progress towards a Tripartite Rationale for Exercise Intensity Prescription

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The public health problem of physical inactivity has proven resistant to research efforts aimed at elucidating its causes and interventions designed to alter its course. Thus, in most industrialized countries, the majority of the population is physically inactive or inadequately active. Most theoretical models of exercise behaviour assume that the decision to engage in exercise is based on cognitive factors (e.g. weighing pros and cons, appraising personal capabilities, evaluating sources of support). Another, still-under-appreciated, possibility is that these decisions are influenced by affective variables, such as whether previous exercise experiences were associated with pleasure or displeasure. This review examines 33 articles published from 1999 to 2009 on the relationship between exercise intensity and affective responses. Unlike 31 studies that were published until 1998 and were examined in a 1999 review, these more recent studies have provided evidence of a relation between the intensity of exercise and affective responses. Pleasure is reduced mainly above the ventilatory or lactate threshold or the onset of blood lactate accumulation. There are pleasant changes at sub-threshold intensities for most individuals, large inter-individual variability close to the ventilatory or lactate threshold and homogeneously negative changes at supra-threshold intensities. When the intensity is self-selected, rather than imposed, it appears to foster greater tolerance to higher intensity levels. The evidence of a doseresponse relation between exercise intensity and affect sets the stage for a reconsideration of the rationale behind current guidelines for exercise intensity prescription. Besides effectiveness and safety, it is becoming increasingly clear that the guidelines should take into account whether a certain level of exercise intensity would be likely to cause increases or decreases in pleasure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Table I
Table II
Table III
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Morris JN. Exercise in the prevention of coronary heart disease: today’s best buy in public health. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994; 26: 807–14

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Miles L. Physical activity and health. Nutr Bull 2007; 32: 314–63

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pedersen BK, Saltin B. Evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in chronic disease. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2006; 16 Suppl.1: 3–63

    Google Scholar 

  4. Warburton DER, Katzmarzyk PT, Rhodes RE, et al. Evidence-informed physical activity guidelines for Canadianadults. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2007; 32: S16–68

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dishman RK. The problem of exercise adherence: fighting sloth in nations with market economies. Quest 2001; 53: 279–94

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bauman A, Armstrong T, Davies J, et al. Trends in physical activity participation and the impact of integrated campaignsamong Australian adults, 1997-99. Aust N Z JPublic Health 2003; 27: 76–9

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brownson RC, Boehmer TK, Luke DA. Declining rates of physical activity in the United States: what are the contributors? Annu Rev Public Health 2005; 26: 421–43

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Craig CL, Russell SJ, Cameron C, et al. Twenty-year trend in physical activity among Canadian adults. Can J Public Health 2004; 95: 59–63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Merom D, Phongsavan P, Chey T, et al. Long-term changes in leisure-time walking, moderate and vigorous exercise:were they influenced by the national physical activityguidelines? J Sci Med Sport 2006; 9: 199–208

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stamatakis E, Ekelund U, Wareham NJ. Temporal trends in physical activity in England: the Health Survey for England, 1991 to 2004. Prev Med 2007; 45: 416–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Blair SN. Physical inactivity: the biggest public health problem of the 21st century. Br J Sports Med 2009; 43: 1–2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. United Kingdom Department of Health, Physical Activity, Health Improvement and Prevention. At least five a week:evidence on the impact of physical activity and its relationshipto health, a report from the Chief Medical Officer, 2004 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.dh.gov.uk [Accessed2011 Jun 16]

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dishman RK, Buckworth J. Increasing physical activity: a quantitative synthesis. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996; 28: 706–19

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Marcus BH, Williams DM, Dubbert PM, et al. Physical activity intervention studies: what we know and what weneed to know. Circulation 2006; 114: 2739–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Newsom JT, McFarland BH, Kaplan MS, et al. The health consciousness myth: implications of the near independenceof major health behaviors in the North Americanpopulation. Soc Sci Med 2005; 60: 433–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dishman RK, Sallis JF, Orenstein DR. The determinants of physical activity and exercise. Public Health Rep 1985; 100: 158–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dishman RK. Determinants of participation in physical activity. In: Bouchard C, Shephard RJ, Stephens T, et al., editors. Exercise, fitness, and health: a consensus of currentknowledge. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1990: 75–101

    Google Scholar 

  18. Williams DM, Dunsiger S, Ciccolo JT, et al. Acute affective response to a moderate-intensity exercise stimulus predictsphysical activity participation 6 and 12 months later. Psychol Sport Exerc 2008; 9: 231–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hardy CJ, Rejeski WJ. Not what, but how one feels: the measurement of affect during exercise. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1989; 11: 304–17

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schneider M, Dunn A, Cooper D. Affect, exercise, and physical activity among healthy adolescents. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2009; 31: 706–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kwan BM, Bryan A. In-task and post-task affective response to exercise: translating exercise intentions into behaviour. Br J Health Psychol 2010; 15: 115–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ekkekakis P, Petruzzello SJ. Acute aerobic exercise and affect: current status, problems, and prospects regardingdose-response. Sports Med 1999; 28: 337–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription (7th ed.). Philadelphia(PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rhodes RE, Warburton DER, Murray H. Characteristics of physical activity guidelines and their effect on adherence: areview of randomized trials. Sports Med 2009; 39: 355–75

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cox KL, Burke V, Gorely TJ, et al. Controlled comparison of retention and adherence in home- vs center-initiatedexercise interventions in women ages 40-65 years: the S.W.E.A.T. study (Sedentary Women Exercise Adherence Trial). Prev Med 2003; 36: 17–29

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee JY, Jensen BE, Oberman A, et al. Adherence in the Training Levels Comparison Trial. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996; 28: 47–52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Perri MG, Anton SD, Durning PE, et al. Adherence to exercise prescriptions: effects of prescribing moderateversus higher levels of intensity and frequency. Health Psychol 2002; 21: 452–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sallis JF, Haskell WL, Fortmann SP, et al. Predictors of adoption and maintenance of physical activity in a communitysample. Prev Med 1986; 15: 331–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pollock ML. How much exercise is enough? Phys Sportsmed 1978; 6: 50–64

    Google Scholar 

  30. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010. 2nd ed., Vol. 2. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000

  31. Dishman RK. Compliance/adherence in health-related exercise. Health Psychol 1982; 1: 237–67

    Google Scholar 

  32. Dishman RK. Health psychology and exercise adherence. Quest 1982; 33: 166–80

    Google Scholar 

  33. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM’s guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. 8th ed. Philadelphia(PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kirkcaldy BC, Shephard RJ. Therapeutic implications of exercise. Int J Sport Psychol 1990; 21: 165–84

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ojanen M. Can the true effects of exercise on psychological variables be separated from placebo effects? Int J Sport Psychol 1994; 25: 63–80

    Google Scholar 

  36. Saklofske DH, Blomme GC, Kelly IW. The effects of exercise and relaxation on energetic and tense arousal. Pers Individ Dif 1992; 13: 623–5

    Google Scholar 

  37. Thayer RE. Energy, tiredness, and tension effects of a sugar snack versus moderate exercise. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987; 52: 119–25

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ekkekakis P, Hall EE, Van Landuyt LM, et al. Walking in (affective) circles: can short walks enhance affect? J Behav Med 2000; 23: 245–75

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ekkekakis P, Backhouse SH, Gray C, et al. Walking is popular among adults but is it pleasant? A framework forclarifying the link between walking and affect as illustratedin two studies. Psychol Sport Exerc 2008; 9: 246–64

    Google Scholar 

  40. Focht BC. Brief walks in outdoor and laboratory environments: effects on affective responses, enjoyment, andintentions to walk for exercise. Res Q Exerc Sport 2009; 80: 611–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Reed J, Ones DS. The effect of acute aerobic exercise on positive activated affect: a meta-analysis. Psychol Sport Exerc 2006; 7: 477–514

    Google Scholar 

  42. Pronk NP, Crouse SF, Rohack JJ. Maximal exercise and acute mood response in women. Physiol Behav 1995; 57

  43. Van Landuyt LM, Ekkekakis P, Hall EE, et al. Throwing the mountains into the lakes: on the perils of nomotheticconceptions of the exercise-affect relationship. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2000; 22: 208–34

    Google Scholar 

  44. Gauvin L, Brawley LR. Alternative psychological models and methodologies for the study of exercise and affect. In: Seraganian P, editor. Exercise psychology: the influenceof physical exercise on psychological processes. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1993: 146–71

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ekkekakis P, Hall EE, Petruzzello SJ. Variation and homogeneity in affective responses to physical activity ofvarying intensities: an alternative perspective on doseresponsebased on evolutionary considerations. J Sports Sci 2005; 23: 477–500

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ekkekakis P, Hall EE, Petruzzello SJ. Some like it vigorous: individual differences in the preference for and toleranceof exercise intensity. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2005; 27: 350–74

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ekkekakis P, Petruzzello SJ. Analysis of the affect measurement conundrum in exercise psychology: I. Fundamental issues. Psychol Sport Exerc 2000; 1: 71–88

    Google Scholar 

  48. Backhouse SH, Ekkekakis P, Biddle SJH, et al. Exercise makes people feel better but people are inactive: paradoxor artifact? J Sport Exerc Psychol 2007; 29: 498–517

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Bixby WR, Spalding TW, Hatfield BD. Temporal dynamics and dimensional specificity of the affective response to exerciseof varying intensity: differing pathways to a commonoutcome. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2001; 23: 171–90

    Google Scholar 

  50. Katch V, Weltman A, Sady S, et al. Validity of the relative percent concept for equating training intensity. Eur JAppl Physiol 1978; 39: 219–27

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Coplan NL, Gleim GW, Nicholas JA. Using exercise respiratory measurements to compare methods of exerciseprescription. Am J Cardiol 1986; 58: 832–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Dwyer J. Metabolic character of exercise at traditional training intensities in cardiac patients and healthy persons. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 1994; 14: 189–96

    Google Scholar 

  53. Dwyer J, Bybee R. Heart rate indices of the anaerobic threshold. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1983; 15: 72–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Goldberg L, Elliot DL, Kuehl KS. Assessment of exercise intensity formulas by use of ventilatory threshold. Chest 1988; 94: 95–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. McConnell TR, Clark BA, Conlin NC, et al. Gas exchange anaerobic threshold: implications for prescribing exercisein cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 1993; 13: 31–6

    Google Scholar 

  56. Meyer T, Gabriel HHW, Kindermann W. Is determination of exercise intensities as percentages of. VO2max of HRmaxadequate? Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: 1342–5

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Normandin EA, Camaione DN, Clark BA, et al. A comparison of conventional versus anaerobic threshold exerciseprescription methods in subjects with left ventricular dysfunction. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 1993; 13: 110–6

    Google Scholar 

  58. Whipp BJ. Domains of aerobic function and their limiting parameters. In: Steinacker JM, Ward SA, editors. The physiology and pathophysiology of exercise tolerance. New York: Plenum, 1996: 83–9

    Google Scholar 

  59. Gaesser GA, Poole DC. The slow component of oxygen uptake kinetics in humans. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1996; 24: 35–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Ekkekakis P, Petruzzello SJ. Analysis of the affect measurement conundrum in exercise psychology: IV. A conceptualcase for the affect circumplex. Psychol Sport Exerc 2002; 3: 35–63

    Google Scholar 

  61. Annesi JJ. Effects of differing durations and intensities of cardiovascular exercise on aversion and feeling states innew women exercisers. Percept Mot Skills 2002; 94: 735–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Kerr JH, Kuk G. The effects of low and high intensity exercise on emotions, stress and effort. Psychol Sport Exerc 2001; 2: 173–86

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wininger SR. Improvement of affect following exercise: methodological artifact or real finding? Anxiety Stress Coping 2007; 20: 93–102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Dyrlund AK, Wininger SR. The effects of music preference and exercise intensity on psychological variables. J Music Ther 2008; 45: 114–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Focht BC, Hausenblas HA. State anxiety responses to acute exercise in women with high social physique anxiety. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2003; 25: 123–44

    Google Scholar 

  66. Focht BC, Hausenblas HA. Exercising in public and private environments: effects on feeling states in women with socialphysique anxiety. J Appl Biobehav Res 2006; 11: 147–65

    Google Scholar 

  67. Lind E, Ekkekakis P, Vazou S. The affective impact of exercise intensity that slightly exceeds the preferred level: ‘pain’ for noadded ‘gain’. J Health Psychol 2008; 13: 464–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Parfitt G, Rose EA, Markland D. The effect of prescribed and preferred intensity exercise on psychological affectand the influence of baseline measures of affect. J Health Psychol 2000; 5: 231–40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Cox RH, Thomas TR, Hinton PS, et al. Effects of acute 60 and 80% V̇O2max bouts of aerobic exercise on stateanxiety of women of different age groups across time. ResQ Exerc Sport 2004; 75: 165–75

    Google Scholar 

  70. Cox RH, Thomas TR, Hinton PS, et al. Effects of acute bouts of aerobic exercise of varied intensity on subjectivemood experiences in women of different age groups acrosstime. J Sport Behav 2006; 29: 40–59

    Google Scholar 

  71. Katula JA, Blissmer BJ, McAuley E. Exercise intensity and self-efficacy effects on anxiety reduction in healthy, olderadults. J Behav Med 1999; 22: 233–47

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. McAuley E, Blissmer B, Katula J, et al. Exercise environment, self-efficacy, and affective responses to acute exercisein older adults. Psychol Health 2000; 15: 341–55

    Google Scholar 

  73. Lochbaum MR, Karoly P, Landers DM. Affect responses to acute bouts of aerobic exercise: a test of opponentprocesstheory. J Sport Behav 2004; 27: 330–48

    Google Scholar 

  74. Lochbaum MR. Viability of resting electroencephalograph asymmetry as a predictor of exercise-induced affect: a lackof consistent support. J Sport Behav 2006; 29: 315–36

    Google Scholar 

  75. Blanchard CM, Rodgers WM, Spence JC, et al. Feeling state responses to acute exercise of high and low intensity. J Sci Med Sport 2001; 4: 30–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Blanchard CM, Rodgers WM, Courneya KS, et al. Moderators of the exercise/feeling-state relationship: the influenceof self-efficacy, baseline, and in-task feeling statesat moderate- and high-intensity exercise. J Appl Soc Psychol 2002; 32: 1379–95

    Google Scholar 

  77. Daley AJ, Huffen C. The effects of low and moderate intensity exercise on subjective experiences in a naturalistichealth and fitness club setting. J Health Psychol 2003; 8: 685–91

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Daley AJ, Welch A. Subjective exercise experiences during and after high and low intensity exercise in active andinactive adult females. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2003; 43: 220–2

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Dunn EC, McAuley E. Affective responses to exercise bouts of varying intensities. J Soc Behav Pers 2000; 15: 201–14

    Google Scholar 

  80. Kilpatrick M, Hebert E, Bartholomew J, et al. Effect of exertional trend during cycle ergometry on postexerciseaffect. Res Q Exerc Sport 2003; 74: 353–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Oweis P, Spinks W. Biopsychological, affective and cognitive responses to acute physical activity. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2001; 41: 528–38

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Smith JC, O’Connor PJ, Crabbe JB, et al. Emotional responsiveness after low- and moderate-intensity exerciseand seated rest. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34: 1158–67

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Tieman JG, Peacock LJ, Peacock LJ, et al. The influence of exercise intensity and physical activity history on stateanxiety after exercise. Int J Sport Psychol 2002; 33: 155–66

    Google Scholar 

  84. Thayer RE. The biopsychology of mood and arousal. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  85. Gauvin L, Rejeski WJ. The Exercise-induced Feeling Inventory: development and initial validation. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1993; 15: 403–23

    Google Scholar 

  86. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto (CA): Consulting Psychologists, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  87. Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Measuring emotion: the Self- Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 1994; 25: 49–59

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. McAuley E, Courneya KS. The Subjective Exercise Experiences Scale (SEES): development and preliminaryvalidation. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1994; 16: 163–77

    Google Scholar 

  89. Bixby WR, Lochbaum MR. Affect responses to acute bouts of aerobic exercise in fit and unfit participants: anexamination of opponent-process theory. J Sport Behav 2006; 29: 111–25

    Google Scholar 

  90. Blanchard CM, Rodgers WM, Wilson PM, et al. Does equating total Vol. of work between two different exerciseconditions matter when examining exercise-inducedfeeling states? Res Q Exerc Sport 2004; 75: 209–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Ekkekakis P, Hall EE, Petruzzello SJ. The relationship between exercise intensity and affective responses demystified:to crack the forty-year-old nut, replace the fortyyear-old nutcracker! Ann Behav Med 2008; 35: 136–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Kilpatrick M, Jarreau D, Bartholomew J, et al. Comparing exercise bouts of different intensities and durations onpost-exercise mood [abstract]. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: S286–7

    Google Scholar 

  93. Kilpatrick MW, Kraemer RR, Bartholomew JB, et al. Affective responses to exercise are dependent on intensityrather than total work. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39: 1417–22

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Parfitt G, Rose EA, Burgess WM. The psychological and physiological responses of sedentary individuals to prescribedand preferred intensity exercise. Br J Health Psychol 2006; 11: 39–53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Rose EA, Parfitt G. A quantitative analysis and qualitative explanation of the individual differences in affective responsesto prescribed and self-selected exercise intensities. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2007; 29: 281–309

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Schneider M, Graham D. Personality, physical fitness, and affective response to exercise among adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 947–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Sheppard KE, Parfitt G. Affective responses to prescribed and self-selected exercise intensities in young adolescentboys and girls. Pediatr Exerc Sci 2008; 20: 129–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect:the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 1988; 54: 1063–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Folstein MF, Luria R. Reliability, validity, and clinical application of the Visual Analogue Mood Scale. Psychol Med 1973; 3: 479–86

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Acevedo EO, Kraemer RR, Haltom RW, et al. Perceptual responses proximal to the onset of blood lactate accumulation. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2003; 43: 267–73

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Acevedo EO, Kraemer RR, Kamimori GH, et al. Stress hormones, effort sense, and perceptions of stress duringincremental exercise: an exploratory investigation. JStrength Cond Res 2007; 21: 283–8

    Google Scholar 

  102. Ekkekakis P, Hall EE, Petruzzello SJ. Practical markers of the transition from aerobic to anaerobic metabolismduring exercise: rationale and a case for affect-based exerciseprescription. Prev Med 2004; 38: 149–59

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Ekkekakis P, Lind E, Vazou S. Affective responses to increasing levels of exercise intensity in normal-weight,overweight, and obese middle-aged women. Obesity 2010; 18: 79–85

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Hall EE, Ekkekakis P, Petruzzello SJ. The affective beneficence of vigorous exercise revisited. Br J Health Psychol 2002; 7: 47–66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Hall EE, Folger SE, Miller PC, et al. Affective responses to a graded exercise test on a recumbent bicycle: when do I startto feel bad [abstract]? Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: S166

    Google Scholar 

  106. Sheppard KE, Parfitt G. Patterning of physiological and affective responses during a graded exercise test in sedentarymen and boys. J Exerc Sci Fitness 2008; 6: 121–9

    Google Scholar 

  107. Welch AS, Hulley A, Ferguson C, et al. Affective responses of inactive women to a maximal incremental exercise test:a test of the dual-mode model. Psychol Sport Exerc 2007; 8: 401–23

    Google Scholar 

  108. Borg G. Borg’s perceived exertion and pain scales. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  109. Ekkekakis P. Let them roam free? Physiological and psychological evidence for the potential of self-selected exercise intensity in public health. Sports Med 2009; 39: 857–88

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Jones AM, Doust JH. Limitations to submaximal exercise performance. In: Eston R, Reilly T, editors. Kinanthropometry and exercise physiology laboratory manual:tests, procedures and data. Vol. 2. London: Routledge, 2001: 280–318

    Google Scholar 

  111. Wyatt FB. Comparison of lactate and ventilatory threshold to maximal oxygen consumption: a meta-analysis. JStrength Cond Res 1999; 13: 67–71

    Google Scholar 

  112. Svedahl K, MacIntosh BR. Anaerobic threshold: the concept and methods of measurement. Can J Appl Physiol 2003; 28: 299–323

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. de Geus EJC, de Moor MHM. A genetic perspective on the association between exercise and mental health. Ment Health Phys Act 2008; 1: 53–61

    Google Scholar 

  114. Morgan WP, O’Connor PJ. Exercise and mental health. In: Dishman RK, editor. Exercise adherence: its impact on public health. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1988: 91–121

    Google Scholar 

  115. Ekkekakis P, Thome J, Hall EE, et al. The Preference for and Tolerance of the Intensity of Exercise Questionnaire:a psychometric evaluation among college women. J Sports Sci 2008; 26: 499–510

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Ekkekakis P, Lind E, Joens-Matre RR. Can self-reported preference for exercise intensity predict physiologicallydefined self-selected exercise intensity? Res Q Exerc Sport 2006; 77: 81–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Ekkekakis P, Lind E, Hall EE, et al. Can self-reported tolerance of exercise intensity play a role in exercise testing? Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39: 1193–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Legrand FD, Bertucci WM, Thatcher J. Telic dominance influences affective response to a heavy-intensity 10-mintreadmill running session. J Sports Sci 2009; 27: 1059–67

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Dishman RK, Farquhar RP, Cureton KJ. Responses to preferred intensities of exertion inmen differing in activitylevels. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994; 26: 783–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Williams DM. Exercise, affect, and adherence: an integrated model and a case for self-paced exercise. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2008; 30: 471–96

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Cabanac M. Exertion and pleasure from an evolutionary perspective. In: Acevedo EO, Ekkekakis P, editors. Psychobiology of physical activity. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2006: 79–89

    Google Scholar 

  122. Farrell PA, Wilmore JH, Coyle EF, et al. Plasma lactate accumulation and distance running performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1979; 11: 338–44

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  123. Tanaka K, Matsuura Y. Marathon performance, anaerobic threshold, and onset of blood lactate accumulation. JAppl Physiol 1984; 57: 640–3

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Lind E, Joens-Matre RR, Ekkekakis P. What intensity of physical activity do formerly sedentary middle-agedwomen select? Evidence of a coherent pattern from physiological,perceptual, and affective markers. Prev Med 2005; 40: 407–19

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq 2000; 11: 227–68

    Google Scholar 

  126. Vazou-Ekkekakis S, Ekkekakis P. Affective consequences of imposing the intensity of physical activity: does the lossof perceived autonomy matter? Hell J Psychol 2009; 6: 125–44

    Google Scholar 

  127. Rose EA, Parfitt G. Can the Feeling Scale be used to regulate exercise intensity? Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008; 40: 1852–60

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Ekkekakis P. Pleasure and displeasure from the body: perspectives from exercise. Cogn Emot 2003; 17: 213–39

    Google Scholar 

  129. Ekkekakis P. The study of affective responses to acute exercise: the dual-mode model. In: Stelter R, Roessler KK, editors. New approaches to sport and exercise psychology. Oxford: Meyer & Meyer, 2005: 119–46

    Google Scholar 

  130. Ekkekakis P, Acevedo EO. Affective responses to acute exercise: toward a psychobiological dose-response model. In: Acevedo EO, Ekkekakis P, editors. Psychobiology of physicalactivity. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2006: 91–109

    Google Scholar 

  131. Meyer T, Lucía A, Earnest CP, et al. A conceptual framework for performance diagnosis and training prescriptionfrom submaximal gas exchange parameters: theory andapplication. Int J Sports Med 2005; 26 ( Suppl.1): S38–48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Hu L, Motl RW, McAuley E, et al. Effects of self-efficacy on physical activity enjoyment in college-aged women. IntJ Behav Med 2007; 14: 92–6

    Google Scholar 

  133. Jerome GJ, Marquez DX, McAuley E, et al. Self-efficacy effects on feeling states in women. Int J Behav Med 2002; 9: 139–54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Martin Ginis KA, Burke SM, Gauvin L. Exercising with others exacerbates the negative effects of mirrored environmentson sedentary women’s feeling states. Psychol Health 2007; 22: 945–62

    Google Scholar 

  135. Raedeke TD, Focht BC, Scales D. Social environmental factors and psychological responses to acute exercise forsocially physique anxious females. Psychol Sport Exerc 2007; 8: 463–76

    Google Scholar 

  136. Lutz R, Lochbaum M, Turnbow K. The role of relative autonomy in post-exercise affect responding. J Sport Behav 2003; 26: 137–54

    Google Scholar 

  137. Petruzzello SJ, Hall EE, Ekkekakis P. Regional brain activation as a biological marker of affective responsivity toacute exercise: influence of fitness. Psychophysiology 2001; 38: 99–106

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  138. Hall EE, Ekkekakis P, Petruzzello SJ. Regional brain activity and strenuous exercise: predicting affective responses usingEEG asymmetry. Biol Psychol 2007; 75: 194–200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Ekkekakis P. The genetic tidal wave finally reached our shores: will it be the catalyst for a critical overhaul of theway we think and do science? Ment Health Phys Act 2008; 1: 47–52

    Google Scholar 

  140. Ekkekakis P. Illuminating the black box: investigating prefrontal cortical hemodynamics during exercise withnear-infrared spectroscopy. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2009; 31: 505–53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Bhambhani Y, Malik R, Mookerjee S. Cerebral oxygenation declines at exercise intensities above the respiratorycompensation threshold. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2007; 156: 196–202

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Perrey S. Non-invasive NIR spectroscopy of human brain function during exercise. Methods 2008; 45: 289–99

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  143. Ruppe T, Perrey S. Prefrontal cortex oxygenation and neuromuscular responses to exhaustive exercise. Eur JAppl Physiol 2008; 102: 153–63

    Google Scholar 

  144. Davidson RJ. The neural circuitry of emotion and affective style: prefrontal cortex and amygdala contributions. Soc Sci Inf 2001; 40: 11–37

    Google Scholar 

  145. Davidson RJ. Anxiety and affective style: role of prefrontal cortex and amygdala. Biol Psychiatry 2002; 51: 68–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Davidson RJ, Jackson DC, Kalin NH. Emotion, plasticity, context, and regulation: perspectives from affective neuroscience. Psychol Bull 2000; 126: 890–909

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  147. Lind E, Welch AS, Ekkekakis P. Do ‘mind over muscle’ strategies work? Examining the effects of attentional associationand dissociation on exertional, affective, and physiologicalresponses to exercise. Sports Med 2009; 39: 743–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Ekkekakis P, Petruzzello SJ. Biofeedback in exercise psychology. In: Blumenstein B, Bar-Eli M, Tenenbaum G, editors. Brain and body in sport and exercise: biofeedbackapplication in performance enhancement. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2002: 77–100

    Google Scholar 

  149. Ekkekakis P, Lind E. Exercise does not feel the same when you are overweight: the impact of self-selected and imposedintensity on affect and exertion. Int J Obes 2006; 30: 652–60

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  150. Myers J, Ashley E. Dangerous curves: a perspective on exercise, lactate, and the anaerobic threshold. Chest 1997; 111: 787–95

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  151. Binder RK, Wonisch M, Corra U, et al. Methodological approach to the first and second lactate threshold in incrementalcardiopulmonary exercise testing. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2008; 15: 726–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Ekkekakis P, Lind E, Hall EE, et al. Do regression-based computer algorithms for determining the ventilatorythreshold agree? J Sports Sci 2008; 26: 967–76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39: 1423–34

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Gordon NF, Scott CB. Exercise intensity prescription in cardiovascular disease: theoretical basis for anaerobicthreshold determination. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 1995; 15: 193–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  155. Meyer T, Görge G, Schwaab B, et al. An alternative approach for exercise prescription and efficacy testing inpatients with chronic heart failure: a randomized controlledtraining study. Am Heart J 2005; 149 (5): 926

    Google Scholar 

  156. Nieuwland W, Berkhuysen MA, Van Veldhuisen DJ, et al. Individual assessment of intensity-level for exercisetraining in patients with coronary artery disease isnecessary. Int J Cardiol 2002; 84: 15–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Strzelczyk TA, Quigg RJ, Pfeifer PB, et al. Accuracy of estimating exercise prescription intensity in patients withleft ventricular systolic dysfunction. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 2001; 21: 158–63

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  158. Soya H, Mukai A, Deocaris CC, et al. Threshold-like pattern of neuronal activation in the hypothalamus duringtreadmill running: establishment of a minimum runningstress (MRS) rat model. Neurosci Res 2007; 58: 341–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  159. Welsch MA, Pollock ML, Brechue WF, et al. Using the exercise test to develop the exercise prescription in healthand disease. Prim Care 1994; 21: 589–609

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  160. Foster C, Porcari JP, Anderson J, et al. The Talk Test as a marker of exercise training intensity. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 2008; 28: 24–30

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Persinger R, Foster C, Gibson M, et al. Consistency of the talk test for exercise prescription. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 1632–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

No sources of funding were used in the preparation of this review. The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to the content of this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Panteleimon Ekkekakis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ekkekakis, P., Parfitt, G. & Petruzzello, S.J. The Pleasure and Displeasure People Feel When they Exercise at Different Intensities. Sports Med 41, 641–671 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2165/11590680-000000000-00000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11590680-000000000-00000

Keywords

Navigation