Int J Sports Med 2008; 29(7): 590-597
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-989264
Clinical Sciences

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Different Diagnostic Tools in Nonfunctional Overreaching

E. Nederhof1 , 2 , J. Zwerver2 , 3 , M. Brink1 , 2 , R. Meeusen4 , K. Lemmink1 , 2
  • 1Center for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • 2University Center for Sports, Exercise and Health, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • 3Center for Sports Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
  • 4Human Physiology and Sports Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
Further Information

Publication History

accepted after revision August 20, 2007

Publication Date:
30 November 2007 (online)

Abstract

The current diagnosis of overreaching and overtraining is based on exclusion. In the present paper, four possible confirmative tools have been examined in three female speed skaters between 16 and 19 years old. A nonfunctional overreached (NFO) athlete, an athlete who was recovering from NFO and a healthy athlete were examined. The NFO athlete showed high stress and low regeneration levels at the Recovery Stress Questionnaire for Athletes. The recovering athlete showed a more favorable profile, although she still showed higher stress and lower recovery than the control athlete. On the Profile of Mood States, the NFO athlete showed an unfavorable profile. The control athlete showed the typical iceberg profile. The recovering athlete showed a profile similar to sedentary individuals. Results on a reaction time task showed decreased performance under pressure for the NFO but not for the control and the recovering athlete. Hormonal reactions to two maximal exercise bouts also differed between the three subjects with an overreaction after the second exercise bout of the NFO athlete as the most remarkable finding. The Recovery Stress Questionnaire for Athletes, reaction times and hormonal reactions to exercise showed to be possible tools that can be used in the diagnostic procedure.

Reference

  • 1 Armstrong L E, VanHeest J L. The unknown mechanism of the overtraining syndrome: clues from depression and psychoneuroimmunology.  Sports Med. 2002;  32 185-209
  • 2 Comalli P EJ, Wapner S, Werner H. Interference effects of Stroop color-word test in childhood, adulthood, and aging.  J Genetic Psychol. 1962;  100 47-53
  • 3 Coutts A J, Wallace L K, Slattery K M. Monitoring changes in performance, physiology, biochemistry and psychology during overreaching and overtraining in triathletes.  Int J Sports Med. 2007;  28 125-134
  • 4 Hedelin R, Wiklund U, Bjerle P, Henriksson-Larsen K. Cardiac autonomic imbalance in an overtrained athlete.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;  32 1531-1533
  • 5 Jurimae J, Maestu J, Purge P, Jurimae T, Soot T. Relations among heavy training stress, mood state, and performance for male junior rowers.  Percept Mot Skills. 2002;  95 520-526
  • 6 Kellmann M, Gunther K D. Changes in stress and recovery in elite rowers during preparation for the Olympic Games.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;  32 676-683
  • 7 Kellmann M, Altenburg D, Lormes W, Steinacker J M. Assessing stress and recovery during preparation for the world championships in rowing.  Sport Psychologist. 2001;  15 151-167
  • 8 Kellmann M, Kallus K W. Recovery-stress Questionnaire for Athletes: User Manual. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics 2001: 1-71
  • 9 Kenttä G, Hassmén P. Overtraining and recovery. A conceptual model.  Sports Med. 1998;  26 1-16
  • 10 LeUnes A. Updated bibliography on the profile of mood states in sport and exercise psychology research.  J Appl Sport Psychol. 2000;  12 110-113
  • 11 Martin D T, Andersen M B, Gates W. Using Profile of Mood States (POMS) to monitor high-intensity training in cyclists: Group versus case studies.  Sport Psychologist. 2000;  14 138-156
  • 12 Meehan H L, Bull S J, Wood D M, James D VB. The overtraining syndrome: A multicontextual assessment.  Sport Psychologist. 2004;  18 154-171
  • 13 Meeusen R, Duclos M, Gleeson M, Steinacker J, Rietjens G, Urhausen A. Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of the overtraining syndrome.  Eur J Sport Sci. 2006;  6 1-14
  • 14 Meeusen R, Piacentini M F, Busschaert B, Buyse L, Schutter G D, Stray-Gundersen J. Hormonal responses in athletes: the use of a two bout exercise protocol to detect subtle differences in (over)training status.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004;  91 140-146
  • 15 Nederhof E, Lemmink K APM, Visscher C, Meeusen R, Mulder T. Psychomotor speed: Possibly a new marker for overtraining syndrome.  Sports Med. 2006;  36 817-828
  • 16 Nederhof E, Lemmink K APM, Zwerver J, Mulder T. The effect of high load training on reaction time in cyclists.  Int J Sports Med. 2007;  28 595-601
  • 17 Neuwirth W, Benesch M. Determination Test; Release 31.00. Moedling, Austria; Dr. G. Schufried GmbH 2003: 5-31
  • 18 Renger R. A review of the profile of mood states (POMS) in the prediction of athletic success.  J Appl Sport Psychol. 1993;  5 78-84
  • 19 Rietjens G JWM, Kuipers H, Adam J J, Saris W HM, Breda van E, Harmont van D, Keizer H A. Physiological, biochemical and psychological markers for overreaching: Early markers for overreaching.  Int J Sports Med. 2005;  26 16-26
  • 20 Steinacker J M, Lormes W, Kellmann M, Liu Y, Reissnecker S, Opitz-Gress A, Baller B, Gunther K, Petersen K G, Kallus K W, Lehmann M, Altenburg D. Training of junior rowers before world championships. Effects on performance, mood state and selected hormonal and metabolic responses.  J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2000;  40 327-335
  • 21 Urhausen A, Kindermann W. Diagnosis of overtraining: what tools do we have?.  Sports Med. 2002;  32 95-102
  • 22 Uusitalo A LT. Overtraining: Making a difficult diagnosis and implementing targeted treatment.  Physician Sports Med. 2001;  29 35-50
  • 23 Wicherts J M, Vorst H CM. Modelpassing van de verkorte Profile of Mood States en meetinvariantie over mannen en vrouwen [Model fit of the short Profile of Mood States and measurement invariance over males and females].  Nederlands Tijdschrift Psychologie. 2004;  59 12-21

Ph. D. Esther Nederhof

University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen
Center for Human Movement Sciences

P. O. Box 196

9700 AD Groningen

Netherlands

Email: e.nederhof@rug.nl

    >