Scaling Cardiac Structural Data by Body Dimensions: A Review of Theory, Practice, and Problems

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Robust estimates of the „true” bivariate relationship between body size (X) and heart size (Y) have seldom been determined empirically. The removal of the covariate influence of body size from cardiac dimension variables facilitates both correct inter- or intra-group comparisons, and the construction of reference standards for normality. In the literature to date this „scaling” or normalisation of cardiac dimensions has been performed typically via a per-ratio standards method, (Y/X), with body surface area chosen as the size denominator. This review demonstrates that the per-ratio standards approach may be theoretically, mathematically, and empirically flawed. The most appropriate scaling procedure appears to be a curvilinear, allometric model of the general form Y = aX^b. The cardiac dimension variable (Y) may be regressed upon the body size variable (X) to derive a power function ratio (Y/X^b) that is allegedly size-independent. The current consensus is that an estimate of fat-free mass (FFM) provides the most appropriate body size variable. In the scaling literature allometric modelling procedures have generally yielded FFM exponents (b) consistent with the theory of geometric similarity. We suggest that cardiac dimension data should be scaled by appropriate powers of FFM, derived from allometric modelling. However, despite the potential superiority of FFM as a scaling denominator, reference standards for normality based on FFM have not been developed or proposed. Future research should examine the robustness of the FFM-cardiac dimension relationship in large samples.

References

• 01 Abergel E, Tase M, Bohlender J, Menard J, Chatellier G. Which definition for left ventricular hypertrophy?.  Amer J Cardiol. 1995;  75 498-502
  Google Scholar
• 02 Albrecht G H, Gelvin B R, Hartman S E. Ratios as a size adjustment in morphometrics.  Amer J Phys Anthropol. 1993;  91 441-468
  Google Scholar
• 03 Andrén B, Lind L, Larsson K, Hedenstierna G, Ljunghall S, Lithell H. The influence of body composition on left ventricular mass and other echocardiographic and Doppler measurements in 70-year old males.  Clin Physiol. 1995;  15 425-433
  Google Scholar
• 04 Atchley W R, Gaskins C T, Anderson D. Statistical properties of ratios. I. Empirical results.  Systems Zool. 1976;  25 137-148
  Google Scholar
• 05 Batterham A M, George K P, Mullineaux D R. Allometric scaling of left ventricular mass by body dimensions in males and females.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;  29 181-186
  Google Scholar
• 06 Batterham A M, George K P. Modelling the influence of body size and composition on M-mode echocardiographic dimensions.  Amer J Physiol. 1998;  274 708
  Google Scholar
• 07 Bella J N, Devereux R B, Roman M J, O'Grady M J, Welty T K, Lee E T, Fabsitz R R, Howard B V. Relations of left ventricular mass to fat-free and adipose body mass: the Strong heart study.  Circulation. 1998;  98 2538-2544
  Google Scholar
• 08 Blimkie C R, Cunningham D A, Nichol P M. Gas transport capacity and the echocardiographically-determined cardiac size in children.  J Appl Physiol. 1980;  49 994-999
  Google Scholar
• 09 Brooks G A, Fahey T D. Fundamentals of Human Performance. New York; Macmillan 1987
  Google Scholar
• 10 Brown S P, Thompson W R. Standardisation indices of cardiac hypertrophy in weight lifters.  J Sports Sci. 1987;  5 147-153
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Byrd B F, Wahr D, Shi Wang Y, Bouchard A, Schiller N B. Left ventricular mass and volume/mass ratio determined by two-dimensional echocardiography in normal adults.  J Amer Coll Cardiol. 1985;  6 1021-1026
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Daniels S R, Kimball T R, Morrison J A, Khoury P, Meyer R A. Indexing left ventricular mass to account for differences in body size in children and adolescents without cardiovascular disease.  Amer J Cardiol. 1995;  76 699-701
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Daniels S R, Kimball T R, Morrison J A, Khoury P, Witt S, Meyer R A. Effect of lean body mass, fat mass, blood pressure, and sexual maturation on left ventricular mass in children and adolescents. Statistical, biological, and clinical significance.  Circulation. 1995;  92 3249-3254
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 de Simone G, Daniels S R, Devereux R B, Meyer R A, Roman M J, de Divitiis O, Alderman M H. Left ventricular mass and body size in normotensive children and adults: Assessment of allometric relations and impact of overweight.  J Amer Coll Cardiol. 1992;  20 1251-1260
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 de Simone G, Devereux R B, Daniels S R, Koren M J, Meyer R A, Laragh J H. Effect of growth on variability of left ventricular mass: Assessment of allometric signals in adults and children and their capacity to predict cardiovascular risk.  J Amer Coll Cardiol. 1995;  25 1056-1062
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Devereux R B, Lutas E M, Casale P N, Kligfield P, Eisenberg R R, Hammond I W, Miller D H, Reis G, Alderman M H, Laragh J H. Standardisation of M-mode echocardiographic left ventricular anatomic measurements.  J Amer Coll Cardiol. 1984;  4 1222-1230
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Döbeln W V. Maximal oxygen intake, body size, and total haemoglobin in normal man.  Acta Phys Scand. 1956;  38 193
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Epstein M, Goldberg S J, Allen H D, Konecke L, Wood J. Great vessels, cardiac chamber and wall growth patterns in normal children.  Circulation. 1975;  67 1124-1129
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Feigenbaum H. Echocardiography (5th Ed). Philadelphia; Lea and Febiger 1994
  Google Scholar
• 20 Fisher A G, Adams T D, Yanowitz F G, Ridges J D, Orsmond G, Nelson A G. Non-invasive evaluation of world class athletes engaged in different modes of training.  Amer J Cardiol. 1989;  63 337-341
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Fleck S J, Pattany P M, Stone M H, Kraemer W J, Thrush J, Wong K. Magnetic resonance imaging determination of left ventricular mass: Junior Olympic weightlifters.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993;  25 522-527
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 George K P, Batterham A M, Jones B. The impact of scalar variable and process on athlete-control comparisons of cardiac dimensions.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;  30 824-830
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 George K P, Batterham A M, Jones B. Echocardiographic evidence of concentric left ventricular enlargement in female weightlifters.  Europ J Appl Physiol. 1998;  79 88-92
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Gerstenblith G, Frederiksen J, Yin F CP, Fortuin N J, Lakatta E G, Weisfeldt M L. Echocardiographic assessment of a normal adult aging population.  Circulation. 1977;  56 273-278
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Gutgesell H P, Rembold C M. Growth of the human heart relative to body surface area.  Amer J Cardiol. 1990;  65 662-668
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Hagan R D, Laird W P, Gettman L R. The problems of per-surface area and per-weight standardisation indices in the determination of cardiac hypertrophy in endurance trained athletes.  J Cardpulm Rehabil. 1985;  5 554-560
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Hawes M R. Human body composition. In: Eston R, Reilly T (eds) Kinanthropometry and Exercise Physiology Laboratory Manual. London; Spon 1996
  Google Scholar
• 28 Henry W L, Gardin J M, Ware J H. Echocardiographic measurements in normal subjects from infancy to old-age.  Circulation. 1980;  62 1054-1060
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Hense H W, Gneiting B, Muscholl M, Broeckel U, Kuch B, Doering A, Riegger G A, Schunkert H. The associations of body size and body composition with left ventricular mass: impacts for indexation in adults.  J Amer Coll Cardiol. 1998;  32 451-457
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Huwez F U, Pringle S D, MacFarlane P W. A comparison of left ventricular mass and volume using different echocardiographic conventions.  Int J Cardiol. 1991;  30 103-108
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Jungers W L, German R Z. Ontogenetic and interspecific skeletal allometry in non-human primates: bivariate versus multivariate allometry.  Amer J Phys Anthropol. 1981;  55 195-202
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Lauer M S, Anderson K M, Kannel W B, Levy D. The impact of obesity on left ventricular mass and geometry: the Framingham Heart Study.  J Amer Med Assn. 1991;  266 231-236
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Lauer M S, Anderson K M, Larson M G, Levy D L. A new method for indexing left ventricular mass for differences in body size.  Amer J Cardiol. 1994;  74 487-491
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Lauer M S, Larson M G, Levy D. Gender-specific reference M-mode values in adults: population-derived values with consideration of the impact of height.  J Amer Coll Cardiol. 1995;  26 1039-1046
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Levy D, Garrison R J, Savage D D, Kannel W B, Castelli W P. Prognostic implications of echocardiographically determined left ventricular mass in the Framingham Heart Study.  New Engl J Med. 1990;  322 1561-1566
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Liao Y, Cooper R S, Durazo-Arvizu R, Mensah G A, Ghali J K. Prediction of mortality risk by different methods of indexation for left ventricular mass.  J Amer Coll Cardiol. 1997;  29 641-647
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Longhurst J C, Kelly A R, Gonyea W J, Mitchell J H. Echocardiographic left ventricular masses in distance runners and weight lifters.  J Appl Physiol. 1980;  48 154-162
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Ludbrook L. Comparing methods of measurement.  Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1997;  24 193-203
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Malcolm D D, Burns T L, Mahoney L T, Lauer R M. Factors affecting left ventricular mass in childhood: The Muscatine Study.  Pediatrics. 1993;  92 703-709
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Maron B J. Structural features of the athletic heart as determined by echocardiography.  J Amer Coll Cardiol. 1986;  7 190-203
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Menapace F J, Hammer W J, Ritzer T F, Kessler K M, Warner H F, Spann J F, Bove A A. Left ventricular size in competitive weight lifters; an echocardiographic study.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;  14 72-75
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Nevill A M, Holder R L. Modelling maximum oxygen uptake: A case study in non-linear regression model formulation and comparison.  Appl Stat. 1994;  43 653-666
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Nevill A M, Ramsbottom R, Williams C. Scaling physiological measurements for individuals of different body size.  Europ J Appl Physiol. 1992;  65 110-117
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Pelliccia A, Maron B J, Spataro A, Proschan M A, Spirito P. The upper limit of physiologic left ventricular hypertrophy in highly-trained elite athletes.  New Engl J Med. 1991;  324 295-301
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Perrault H, Turcotte R A. Exercise-induced cardiac hypertrophy: fact or fallacy?.  Sports Med. 1994;  17 288-308
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Prothero J. Heart weight as a function of body weight in mammals.  Growth. 1979;  43 139-150
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Roge C LL, Silverman P A, Hart P A, Ray R M. Cardiac structure growth pattern determined by echocardiography.  Circulation. 1978;  57 285-290
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Roman M J. How best to identify prognostically important left ventricular hypertrophy: A cut to the chase.  J Amer Coll Cardiol. 1997;  29 648-650
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Savage D D, Garrison R J, Kannel W B, Levy D, Anderson S J, Stokes III J, Feinleib M, Castelli W P. The spectrum of left ventricular hypertrophy in a general population sample: the Framingham Study.  Circulation. 1987;  75 126-133
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Savage D D, Levy D, Dannenberg A L, Garrison R J, Castelli W P. Association of echocardiographic left ventricular mass with body size, blood pressure and physical activity (The Framingham Study).  Amer J Cardiol. 1990;  65 371-376
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Schmidt-Nielsen K. Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important?. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press 1984
  Google Scholar
• 52 Sharma S, Whyte G, McKenna W J. Sudden cardiac death from cardiovascular disease in young athletes: fact or fiction?.  Brit J Sports Med. 1997;  31 269-276
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Shepherd R J. The athlete's heart: is big beautiful?.  Brit J Sports Med. 1996;  30 5-10
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Tanner J M. Fallacy of per-weight and per-surface area standards and their relation to spurious correlation.  J Appl Physiol. 1949;  2 1-15
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Triuzli M, Gillam L D, Gentile F, Newell J B, Weyman A E. Normal adult cross-sectional echocardiographic values: linear dimensions and chamber areas.  Echocardiography. 1983;  1 403-426
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Urbina E M, Gidding S S, Bao W, Pickoff A S, Berdusis K, Berenson G S. Effect of body size, ponderosity, and blood pressure on left ventricular growth in children and young adults in the Bogalusa Heart Study.  Circulation. 1995;  91 2400-2406
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Urhausen A, Kindermann W. Echocardiographic findings in strength- and endurance-trained athletes.  Sports Med. 1992;  13 270-284
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 West G B, Brown J H, Enquist B J. A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology.  Science. 1997;  276 122-126
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 59 Weyman A E. Principles and practice of echocardiography (2nd Ed). Philadelphia; Lea and Febiger 1994
  Google Scholar

Alan M. Batterham

Sport and Exercise Science Section, School of Social Sciences University of Teesside

Borough Road

Middlesbrough, TS1 3BA, UK

Phone: +44 (0) 1642342354

Fax: +44 (0) 1642342399

Email: A.Batterham@tees.ac.uk