Abstract
Studies in pediatric oncology have shown a positive effect of physical activity on disease- and treatment-related side effects. Although several reviews have approved the benefits of therapeutic exercise for adult cancer patients, no systematic review exists summarizing the evidence of physical activity in pediatric oncology. We identified a total of 17 studies using the PubMed database and Cochrane library. To evaluate the evidence, we used the evaluation system of the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine 2001. The findings confirm that clinical exercise interventions are feasible and safe, especially with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients and during medical treatment. No adverse effects have been reported. Positive effects were found on fatigue, strength, and quality of life. Single studies present positive effects on the immune system, body composition, sleep, activity levels, and various aspects of physical functioning. Child-specific aspects such as cognitive abilities, growth, adolescence, and reintegration into peer-groups, school, and sports have barely been taken into consideration. The evidence for exercise interventions in pediatric oncology is rated level “3.” Although the results are very promising, future research of high methodological quality and focusing on child-specific aspects is needed to establish evidence-based exercise recommendations, particularly for childhood cancer patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
As a result of improved treatment regimes in pediatric oncology, the survival rates of children with cancer have risen to ~80% for 5-y survival (1,2,3,4). Therefore, the population of childhood cancer survivors is constantly growing. Despite these positive developments, childhood cancer is associated with a wide spectrum of various disease- and treatment-related side effects that may develop into chronic diseases and therefore result in long-term consequences. A negative impact on social, psychological, and physiological levels can be observed. Inactivity (5,6,7), impaired cardiopulmonary and musculoskeletal function, as well as reduced motor performance levels (8,9) and cognitive abilities (10) have been detected. Current studies also examined a negative impact on psychological well-being, satisfaction, and social functioning (11). Taken together, an impaired quality of life can thus be determined (8,12).
During the past few years, several studies have generated first hints describing holistic, positive effects of clinical exercise interventions in pediatric oncology. First results present an association between increased physical activity levels in childhood cancer patients and an improvement in quality of life (13). In particular, physical functioning is increased, anxiety is reduced, and social integration is encouraged (14). Considering the fact that physical activity plays a vital role in the physiological and psychosocial development of children, therapeutic exercise in pediatric oncology is particularly important. However, there is still a lack of comprehensive and evidence-based data in the field of exercise interventions in pediatric oncology. Therefore, evidence-based exercise recommendations for childhood cancer patients are still missing (15,16).
By contrast, systematic reviews in adult oncology have already been available for some years (17) and have even focused on specific entities such as prostate cancer (18). In pediatric oncology, three reviews (3,15,16) provided an overview of current research with promising results, but to our knowledge, no systematic review on exercise interventions including evidence levels has yet been published. However, this information would be important to establish evidence-based exercise recommendations particularly for childhood cancer patients.
Because multiple studies on clinical exercise interventions in pediatric oncology have recently been published, it seems to be appropriate and necessary to conduct a systematic review, including levels of evidence and quality of trials. Therefore, the objective of the following review is to compile and structure current investigations examining the effects of exercise interventions in pediatric oncology and to evaluate the evidence of these studies for the first time.
Results
According to the defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 17 studies investigating clinical exercise interventions in pediatric oncology with a total of 282 participating children were included ( Table 1 ). Of all the study participants, 257 children were diagnosed with cancer. Six of the identified studies did not enroll a control group (19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26). Ten studies did include 10 or more patients (21,25,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34). Five randomized, controlled trials have been identified (28,29,30,31,33) and were ranked with evidence level “2b.” Six studies reached level “3b” as they included a control group but were not randomized (8,27,32,34,35,36). Six studies were classified level “4” (19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26) because they did not enroll a control group. Only two of all included studies calculated and published confidence intervals (8,31).
Although eight studies were conducted with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients (20,22,23,24,26,28,30,31,34,35), study cohorts including mixed cancer types have also been examined (19,21,25,29,33,36). The settings differ from supervised exercise intervention (8,19,21,22,23,24,27,29,32,33,35) to home-based exercise programs (31,34). Six studies included a combination of a supervised and an additional home-based exercise intervention (20,25,26,28,30,36). Exercise interventions within the hospital were always supervised. Most studies were conducted during medical treatment, but four studies included patients exclusively after cessation of treatment (8,21,25,26). One study included patients during medical treatment, as well as during survivorship (36). Only two studies conducted a home-based exercise intervention during medical treatment (maintenance therapy) (31,34). The duration varies from a short term 2–4-d intervention (29) to a 2-y program (28). One study even investigated the effects of an acute exercise intervention of 30 min on immune parameters (35). However, most studies covered an 8–16-wk training period. Regarding the form of exercise, a combined exercise program including strength, endurance, and coordination was performed in most studies. Three studies analyzed the effect of an isolated endurance training (29,34,35), and one study examined the effects of a yoga intervention (19).
First, the results of all included studies confirm that exercise interventions with childhood cancer patients are feasible and safe. No adverse effects or complications related to the exercise intervention were reported in any of these 17 studies. Within four studies, “feasibility” was one of the main outcomes, and all authors present positive results within this context (20,26,32,35). Adherence has been examined within eight studies and ranges between 67 and 98% (8,21,23,24,27,28,29,32,35). Only one study with a duration of 2 y reported an unsatisfactory adherence to the exercise program (28). Next to feasibility, all studies included some parameter of physical functioning (i.e., strength, motor function, and endurance) as one of the main outcomes. Fatigue has been evaluated within five of the included studies (21,26,29,32,34) and quality of life within seven studies (8,19,20,21,23,24,32,33). However, the examination of psychological parameters focused only on quality of life, and a specific psychological analysis has not been conducted yet.
Most studies investigating fatigue as one of the main outcomes present a positive impact of clinical exercise during medical treatment (32,34), as well as during survivorship (21). However, these findings are not confirmed by all authors (26,29). Positive effects were also found on health-related quality of life (8,19,20,32,33) and muscle strength (8,22,23,24,27,30) during medical treatment and during survivorship (21). Furthermore, clinical exercise interventions have a positive impact on BMI and body fat (28), sleep efficiency and duration (29), and activity levels (21,25,31), as well as ankle dorsiflexion (30), motor function (20), endurance (8,22,23,24,27), functional mobility (8,22,23,24), and flexibility (21). In contrast to these positive effects, Hartman et al. (28) reported that their exercise program was not more beneficial than standard care in terms of bone mineral density, motor performance, and ankle dorsiflexion. However, this might be due to the unsatisfactory adherence within this study. Takken et al. (26) reported no significant changes in muscle strength, exercise capacity, functional mobility, and fatigue during their 12-wk exercise program. However, their program was described as being too demanding.
The effects of clinical exercise on the immune system suggest that physical activity in pediatric oncology can be safely undertaken (22,23,24,27,35,36). None of these studies focusing on immune parameters found any negative effects that argue against exercise with childhood cancer patients. However, Shore and Shepard (36) recommend a careful monitoring of the immune response.
Discussion
Taken together, the findings of this, possibly first, systematic review on exercise interventions in pediatric oncology confirm that engaging childhood cancer patients in physical activity is feasible and safe. None of the included studies described any adverse effects. In addition, the results present positive effects of supervised physical activity during medical treatment. Although Huang and Ness (15) found evidence primarily in terms of positive effects on muscle strength, flexibility, and cardiopulmonary fitness, we found positive evidence mainly in terms of feasibility, fatigue, muscle strength, and quality of life. Only single studies examined a positive impact on the immune system (22,23,24,27,35,36), body composition (28), sleep (29), activity levels (21,25,31), and various aspects of physical functioning (8,20,21,22,23,24,27,30). Therefore, it is hardly possible to provide any precise statements about these parameters.
By contrast, the current study situation on exercise interventions with adult cancer patients is considerably better. There is good evidence that exercise has a positive impact on fatigue, physical fitness, quality of life, and strength in adult breast cancer, prostate cancer, leukemia, and lymphoma patients (37).
In addition, it needs to be noted that the main outcomes in all included studies are comparable with those in adult oncology. Fatigue and quality-of-life questionnaires have been specifically developed for children, but the effects of therapeutic exercise on child-specific parameters such as cognitive abilities, motor development, growth, and adolescence have hardly been evaluated. Moreover, the reintegration into peer groups, school, and sport has not been examined, as well. To develop specific exercise interventions for childhood cancer patients, future research must therefore focus on child-specific aspects. In addition, psychopathological aspects such as anxiety, depression, and self-esteem were barely taken into consideration.
The comprehensive evaluation of the identified studies is very challenging because they all differ substantially in terms of study design, outcomes, assessments, duration, and setting. Regarding the study designs, six studies did not enroll a control group (19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26), only 10 studies included a sample of 10 or more patients (21,25,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34), and only five randomized, controlled trials have been conducted (28,29,30,31,33).
In terms of duration and setting, the exercise interventions differ as well. Whereas most studies were conducted within a 6–16-wk period, long-term trials of 1–2 y could be found. Furthermore, most exercise interventions have been conducted within a study cohort of ALL patients and were carried out during medical treatment. Except two (31,34), all studies were supervised programs that present a higher adherence as compared with home-based programs. To date, this large heterogeneity in terms of study design, duration, and setting makes it impossible to define evidence-based exercise recommendations. However, practical experience reveals that therapeutic exercise programs for childhood cancer patients are partly integrated into the therapeutic care structure of some childhood cancer centers. For the main part, these programs differ substantially. Future research must focus on exercise intervention studies that are not only feasible and safe but also realistic and transferable so that childhood cancer patients and their families are able to integrate them into their everyday lives. Research must focus on cancer diagnosis other than ALL, as well as on patients during survivorship and child-specific outcomes.
The overall study situation on exercise interventions in pediatric oncology is considered to be limited. Current literature includes primarily explorative, descriptive pilot studies. In summary, the evidence for clinical exercise interventions with childhood cancer patients is rated evidence level “3.” However, it must be noted that the ranking of all studies according to the Oxford Levels of Evidence-Based Medicine has been conducted without considering confidence intervals, because only two studies reported those. Therefore, studies might be under- or overrated. In addition, certain subjectivity might exist, although all evaluation systems are associated with some restrictions (38,39,40). Another unavoidable limitation of this systematic review is the literature research. Although a systematic and comprehensive research has been performed, possibly not all relevant studies were identified.
Taken together, this systematic review provides evidence that clinical exercise interventions in pediatric oncology are feasible and safe. Relatively good evidence is given in terms of positive effects of supervised exercise programs during medical treatment on fatigue, muscle strength, and quality of life. However, because most studies were conducted within a study cohort of ALL patients, this review provides the best evidence only within this patient group. Future research must therefore focus on cancer diagnosis other than ALL, as well as on patients during survivorship. Exercise intervention studies must be designed to be realizable and transferable into the everyday life of childhood cancer patients. In addition, relevant child-specific outcomes and appropriate assessments must be determined to evaluate the holistic effects of therapeutic exercise specifically on childhood cancer patients. Consequently, as presented in other reviews, the current literature not only provides promising results but also reveals challenges to be faced in the future (3,12,13,15,16).
Methods
This review focuses on clinical exercise interventions among pediatric cancer patients. Throughout August 2012, two independent researchers identified studies by searching the PubMed database and Cochrane library. The search terms listed in Table 2 were entered in different combinations. Reference lists of selected papers were also tracked to find additional studies related to our topic. Related reviews were scanned to find further relevant information. According to defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, only studies investigating exercise interventions with pediatric cancer patients (0–21 y of age), published in the English language, were included. Studies published before 1990 or focusing on physical activity behavior or motivation were excluded.
To evaluate the evidence of the included studies, the evaluation system of the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine 2001 was used because it has been specially developed to evaluate the evidence of therapeutic interventions (40,41). This evaluation system contains five levels of evidence ranked from 1 (least potential bias) to 5 (most potential bias) and is primarily based on the study design. The best evidence (level “1a”) is given by systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials. Randomized controlled trials with narrow confidence intervals are ranked level “1b,” whereas individual cohort studies or low-quality randomized controlled trials are ranked level “2b.” Individual case–control studies reach level “3b,” and case series or poor-quality cohort and case–control studies are ranked level “4.” Therefore, the quality of the study and the reported results are considered likewise, as well (40,41). Ranking studies according to these defined levels of evidence enable the determination of a lack of evidence within a specific field of research. This might help future researchers to generate specific studies aiming to improve therapeutic exercise in pediatric oncology.
As shown in Figure 1 , titles, abstracts, and full-text articles were viewed considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Finally, 19 full-text articles focusing on clinical exercise interventions in pediatric oncology were included in the following systematic review. However, only 17 studies are described within this review because the results of one study have been published within three different articles. All included studies examined some of the following parameters: acceptance and feasibility, quality of life, physical function/functional mobility, immune status, fatigue, bone mineral density, ankle dorsiflexion, body composition, activity, and/or sleep.
Statement of Financial Support
No financial assistance was received in support of the study.
Disclosure
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
Cancer Research UK. CancerStats. Childhood Cancer – Great Britain & UK. November 2010. (http://publications.cancerresearchuk.org/downloads/product/CS_CS_CHILDHOOD.pdf).
Robert Koch-Institut. Krebs in Deutschland 2007/2008 – Häufigkeiten und Trends [Cancer in Germany 2007/2008—frequencies and trends], 8th edn. Berlin, Germany: Robert Koch-Institut.
San Juan AF, Wolin K, Lucía A . Physical activity and pediatric cancer survivorship. Recent Results Cancer Res 2011;186:319–47.
Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A . Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 2013;63:11–30.
Florin TA, Fryer GE, Miyoshi T, et al. Physical inactivity in adult survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the childhood cancer survivor study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16:1356–63.
Wampler MA, Galantino ML, Huang S, et al. Physical activity among adult survivors of childhood lower-extremity sarcoma. J Cancer Surviv 2012;6:45–53.
Winter C, Müller C, Brandes M, et al. Level of activity in children undergoing cancer treatment. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2009;53:438–43.
San Juan AF, Chamorro-Viña C, Moral S, et al. Benefits of intrahospital exercise training after pediatric bone marrow transplantation. Int J Sports Med 2008;29:439–46.
De Souza AM, Potts JE, Potts MT, et al. A stress echocardiography study of cardiac function during progressive exercise in pediatric oncology patients treated with anthracyclines. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007;49:56–64.
Krull KR, Annett RD, Pan Z, et al. Neurocognitive functioning and health-related behaviours in adult survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Eur J Cancer 2011;47:1380–8.
Aznar S, Webster AL, San Juan AF, et al. Physical activity during treatment in children with leukemia: a pilot study. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2006;31:407–13.
Wright MJ, Galea V, Barr RD . Proficiency of balance in children and youth who have had acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Phys Ther 2005;85:782–90.
Demark-Wahnefried W, Werner C, Clipp EC, et al. Survivors of childhood cancer and their guardians. Cancer 2005;103:2171–80.
Paxton RJ, Jones LW, Rosoff PM, Bonner M, Ater JL, Demark-Wahnefried W . Associations between leisure-time physical activity and health-related quality of life among adolescent and adult survivors of childhood cancers. Psychooncology 2010;19:997–1003.
Huang TT, Ness KK . Exercise interventions in children with cancer: a review. Int J Pediatr 2011;2011:461512.
Winter C, Müller C, Hoffmann C, Boos J, Rosenbaum D . Physical activity and childhood cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2010;54:501–10.
Knols R, Aaronson NK, Uebelhart D, Fransen J, Aufdemkampe G . Physical exercise in cancer patients during and after medical treatment: a systematic review of randomized and controlled clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:3830–42.
Baumann FT, Zopf EM, Bloch W . Clinical exercise interventions in prostate cancer patients–a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Support Care Cancer 2012;20:221–33.
Geyer R, Lyons A, Amazeen L, Alishio L, Cooks L . Feasibility study: the effect of therapeutic yoga on quality of life in children hospitalized with cancer. Pediatr Phys Ther 2011;23:375–9.
Gohar SF, Comito M, Price J, Marchese V . Feasibility and parent satisfaction of a physical therapy intervention program for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the first 6 months of medical treatment. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2011;56:799–804.
Keats MR, Culos-Reed SN . A community-based physical activity program for adolescents with cancer (project TREK): program feasibility and preliminary findings. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2008;30:272–80.
Ruiz J, Fleck S, Vingren J, et al. Preliminary findings of a 4-month intrahospital exercise training intervention on IGFs and IGFBPs in children with leukemia. J Strength Cond Res 2010;5:1292–7.
San Juan AF, Fleck SJ, Chamorro-Viña C, et al. Early-phase adaptations to intrahospital training in strength and functional mobility of children with leukemia. J Strength Cond Res 2007;21:173–7.
San Juan AF, Fleck SJ, Chamorro-Viña C, et al. Effects of an intrahospital exercise program intervention for children with leukemia. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007;39:13–21.
Sharkey AM, Carey AB, Heise CT, Barber G . Cardiac rehabilitation after cancer therapy in children and young adults. Am J Cardiol 1993;71:1488–90.
Takken T, van der Torre P, Zwerink M, et al. Development, feasibility and efficacy of a community-based exercise training program in pediatric cancer survivors. Psychooncology 2009;18:440–8.
Chamorro-Viña C, Ruiz JR, Santana-Sosa E, et al. Exercise during hematopoietic stem cell transplant hospitalization in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010;42:1045–53.
Hartman A, te Winkel ML, van Beek RD, et al. A randomized trial investigating an exercise program to prevent reduction of bone mineral density and impairment of motor performance during treatment for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2009;53:64–71.
Hinds P, Hockenberry M, Rai S, et al. Clinical field testing of an enhanced-activity intervention in hospitalized children with cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage 2007;6:686–97.
Marchese VG, Chiarello LA, Lange BJ . Effects of physical therapy intervention for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2004;42:127–33.
Moyer-Mileur LJ, Ransdell L, Bruggers CS . Fitness of children with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia during maintenance therapy: response to a home-based exercise and nutrition program. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2009;31:259–66.
Rosenhagen A, Bernhörster M, Vogt L, et al. Implementation of structured physical activity in the pediatric stem cell transplantation. Klin Padiatr 2011;223:147–51.
Speyer E, Herbinet A, Vuillemin A, Briançon S, Chastagner P . Effect of adapted physical activity sessions in the hospital on health-related quality of life for children with cancer: a cross-over randomized trial. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2010;55:1160–6.
Yeh CH, Man Wai JP, Lin US, Chiang YC . A pilot study to examine the feasibility and effects of a home-based aerobic program on reducing fatigue in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Nurs 2011;34:3–12.
Ladha AB, Courneya KS, Bell GJ, Field CJ, Grundy P . Effects of acute exercise on neutrophils in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia survivors: a pilot study. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2006;28:671–7.
Shore S, Shepard RJ . Immune responses to exercise in children treated for cancer. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 1999;39:240–3.
Schmitz KH, Courneya KS, Matthews C, et al.; American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010;42:1409–26.
Jüni P, Witschi A, Bloch R, Egger M . The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. JAMA 1999;282:1054–60.
Olivo SA, Macedo LG, Gadotti IC, Fuentes J, Stanton T, Magee DJ . Scales to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials: a systematic review. Phys Ther 2008;88:156–75.
Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S, et al.; GRADE Working Group. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res 2004;4:38.
Phillips B, Ball C, Sackett D, et al. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence (March 2009). Updated by Jeremy Howick March 2009. (http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
PowerPoint slides
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baumann, F., Bloch, W. & Beulertz, J. Clinical exercise interventions in pediatric oncology: a systematic review. Pediatr Res 74, 366–374 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2013.123
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2013.123
This article is cited by
-
Exercise and Sports Participation in Children with Cardiomyopathy: A Review
Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine (2023)
-
Disparities in economic burden for children with leukemia insured by resident basic medical insurance: evidence from real-world data 2015–2019 in Guangdong, China
BMC Health Services Research (2022)
-
Barriers and facilitators to physical activity participation for child, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors: a systematic review
Journal of Cancer Survivorship (2022)
-
Non-pharmacological sleep interventions for pediatric cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review protocol
Systematic Reviews (2021)
-
Physical activity for pediatric cancer survivors: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Journal of Cancer Survivorship (2021)