Skip to main content
Original Article

Psychometric Properties of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ)

Validation, Prediction, and Discrimination Quality of the Dutch Version

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000092

Self-efficacy beliefs are an important psychosocial determinant of pain behavior and predict the outcome of pain management programs. Participants in these programs are challenged to live a life as normal as possible despite the pain. In view of the continuous presence of pain, self-efficacy measurement should take this into account. The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) asks participants to take the pain into account when rating their self-efficacy beliefs. In the present study, this questionnaire is examined on its psychometric qualities. The study also examines self-efficacy as an independent predictor of outcome measures after controlling for pain intensity. 278 chronic pain patients participate in this study, divided into two samples. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis supported a 1-factor solution. Internal consistency was excellent, and test-retest reliability was adequate. Regression analysis showed that pain self-efficacy was an independent predictor of disability and quality of life after controlling for pain intensity. Furthermore, the PSEQ discriminated between workers and nonworkers, and between patients who used medication and those who did not.

References

  • Altmaier, E. M. , Russell, D. W. , Kao, C. F. , Lehmann, T. R. , Weinstein, J. N. (1993). Role of self-efficacy in rehabilitation outcome among chronic low back pain patients. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40, 335–339. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Asghari, A. , Nicholas, M. K. (2001). Pain self-efficacy beliefs and pain behavior. A prospective study. Pain, 94, 85–100. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy – Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Clark, L. A. , Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Denison, E. , Åsenlöf, P. , & Linberg, P. (2004). Self-efficacy, fear avoidance, and pain intensity as predictors of disability in subacute and chronic musculoskeletal pain patients in primary health care. Pain, 111, 245–252. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Gommans, I. H. B. , Koes, B. W. , Van Tulder, M. W. (1997). Validiteit en responsiviteit Nederlandstalige Roland Disability Questionnaire. Vragenlijst naar functionele status bij patiënten met lage rugpijn [Validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Roland Disability Questionnaire. Questionnaireof functional status for patients with low back pain]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Fysiotherapie, 107, 28–33. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Hu, L. T. , Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jensen, M. P. , Turner, J. A. , Romano, J. M. (1991). Self-efficacy and outcome expectancies: Relationship to chronic pain oping strategies and adjustment. Pain, 44, 263–269. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Karoly, P. , Okun, M. A. , Ruehlman, L. S. , Pugliese, J. A. (2008). The impact of goal cognition and pain severity on disability and depression in adults with chronic pain: An examination of direct effects and mediated effects via pain-induced fear. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32, 418–433. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lohr, K. N. (2002). Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Quality of Life Research, 11, 193–205. doi: 10.1023/a:1015291021312 First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Melzack, R. (1975). The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods. Pain, 1, 277–299. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Meredith, P. , Strong, J. , Feeney, J. A. (2006). Adult attachment, anxiety, and pain self-efficacy as predictors of pain and disability. Pain, 123, 146–154. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Nicholas, M. K. (2007). The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: Taking pain into account. European Journal of Pain, 11, 153–163. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Pollard, C. A. (1984). Preliminary validity study of the Pain Disability Index. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 974–974. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Roland, M. , Morris, R. (1983). A study of the natural-history of back pain. 1. Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back-pain. Spine, 8, 141–144. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sardà, J. , Nicholas, M. K. , Pimenta, C. A. M. , Asghari, A. (2007). Pain-related self-efficacy beliefs in a Brazilian chronic pain patient sample: A psychometric analysis. Stress and Health, 23, 185–190. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sperber, A. D. (2004). Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology, 126, S124–S128. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Van der Kloot, W. A. , Oostendorp, R. A. B. , Van der Meij, J. , Van den Heuvel, J. (1995). De Nederlandse versie van “McGill Pain Questionnaire”: een betrouwbare pijnvragenlijst [The Dutch version of McGill Pain Questionnaire: A reliable pain questionnaire]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, 139, 669–673. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • van der Roer, N. , van Tulder, M. , Barendse, J. , Knol, D. , van Mechelen, W. , de Vet, H. (2008). Intensive group training protocol versus guideline physiotherapy for patients with chronic low back pain: A randomised controled trial. European Spine Journal, 17, 1193–1200. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • van der Zee, K. I. , Sanderman, R. , Heyink, J. W. , de Haes, H. (1996). Psychometric qualities of the RAND 36-item health survey 1.0: A multidimensional measure of general health status. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 3, 104–122. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vlaeyen, J. W. S. , Kole-Snijders, A. M. J. , Boeren, R. G. B. , van Eek, H. (1995). Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance. Pain, 62, 363–372. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Vong, S. K. , Cheing, G. L. , Chan, C. C. , Chan, F. , Leung, A. S. (2009). Measurement structure of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in a sample of Chinese patients with chronic pain. Clinical Rehabilitation, 23, 1034–1043. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Woby, S. R. , Roach, N. K. , Urmston, M. , Watson, P. J. (2005). Psychometric properties of the TSK-11: A shortened version of the tampa scale for kinesiophobia. Pain, 117, 8. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Woby, S. R. , Roach, N. K. , Urmston, M. , Watson, P. J. (2008). Outcome following a phydiotherapist-led intervention for chronic low back pain: The important role of cognitive processes. Physiotherapy, 94, 115–124. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar