Original paper
The effect of internal and external foot rotation on the adduction moment and lateral–medial shear force at the knee during gait

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2007.03.004Get rights and content

Summary

It has been hypothesised that those with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis tend to externally rotate their foot during gait in order to unload the diseased compartment. This has been found to decrease the adduction moment at the knee during late stance, although the effects of foot rotation on shear forces at the knee have not yet been determined. Also, the effects of internal foot rotation on the knee during gait are not clear. This study performed a gait analysis on 11 healthy participants (M: 6; mean age 22.9 ± 1.8 years) in three conditions: (1) natural foot rotation position; (2) internal foot rotation and (3) external foot rotation. Three-dimensional gait analysis calculated the knee adduction moment and lateral–medial shear force for all three foot rotation conditions. Internal rotation of the foot increased the knee adduction moment and lateral–medial shear force magnitude during late stance, while external rotation of the foot decreased the magnitude of both these measures. This implies that walking with an externally and internally rotated foot may unload the diseased compartment for those with medial and lateral compartment knee OA, respectively. Also, the relationship of foot rotation angle to the adduction moment and lateral–medial shear force was strengthened when data were corrected for the subject's normal walking condition. Knee OA subject data revealed that they were able to reduce the knee adduction moment more than normal subjects during late stance, indicating that other factors besides the rotation of the foot need to be investigated.

Introduction

Recently, there has been great interest in the mechanical factors that contribute to the development and progression of knee OA. Since OA involves the degeneration of cartilage, it is believed that the interaction between functional, anatomical and biological factors should be considered when attempting to determine OA's rate of progression.1 However, it is generally accepted that abnormal loading of the articular cartilage over time contributes to cartilage wear and eventually to knee OA. This suggests that the knee's loading environment should be considered when evaluating strategies to delay or prevent the progression of osteoarthritis. Two measures of cartilage loading that have been implicated are the knee's adduction moment2, 3 and lateral–medial shear force created during walking.4, 5

In general terms, the knee's adduction moment is due to the ground reaction force vector acting medially to the knee's axis of rotation in the frontal plane, causing an external moment that would tend to rotate the tibia medially relative to the femur. Mechanically, a large adduction moment increases the load on the knee's medial compartment and is a risk factor for medial knee OA if the resulting compressive force is abnormally high. This is supported by studies that show that the magnitude of the adduction moment determines the load distribution between the medial and lateral compartments of the knee joint2 and that its magnitude predicts the progression of OA.3 Additionally, people with medial compartment knee OA have a higher knee adduction moment than normal controls.3, 6

It is possible that, since an abnormally high adduction moment is a risk factor for medial OA, perhaps an abnormally low adduction moment is a risk factor for lateral OA. Historically, few studies have examined lateral knee OA as it was assumed to be a relatively rare condition. However, a more recent study has reported that lateral OA is more common in certain populations than originally thought.7 Two recent studies have demonstrated the relationship between lateral OA and a reduced adduction moment. In both a cross-sectional study of preoperative medial (n = 15) and lateral (n = 15) OA,8 and in a longitudinal case study that tracked the gait patterns of previously healthy, asymptomatic older adults over a 5–11-year follow-up period,4 lateral OA subjects had significantly smaller adduction moments compared to normal controls.

Along with the adduction moment, shear loads at the knee might also need to be considered. Several studies have examined the effects of shear stress on animal and cadaver cartilage in vitro9, 10, 11, 12 and have determined that shear forces are detrimental to cartilage health. The mechanism for the detrimental effect is not clear. Some researchers have implicated biochemical pathways,9, 10, 11 while others have implicated mechanical factors.12, 13 It has also been suggested that the shear forces experienced by the knee during gait may be important in helping to explain cartilage loss and the development of OA.4 Also, a study using principal components analysis and descriminant analysis of nine gait curves (three-dimensional forces, moments and angles) and eight discrete measures was successfully able to discriminate between an osteoarthritic and a normal population.5 The lateral–medial shear force was the variable explaining most of the variation in the first discriminatory feature and was also a factor in the second most discriminatory feature. In comparison, the adduction moment contributed less than the LM force to the percent variation explained for the first most discriminatory feature, and was not identified as a major contributing factor to the second most discriminatory feature. Therefore, shear forces appear to be an important factor in the progression of knee OA.

Those with symptomatic medial OA often try to unload the diseased medial compartment by walking with an externally rotated foot.14 This foot rotation decreases the adduction moment during late stance when the whole foot is in contact with the ground15, 16, 17, 18 and is thought to be an effective compensation strategy for those with medial compartment knee OA. Conversely, it may be speculated that walking with an internally rotated foot might be an effective strategy to unload the lateral compartment in lateral knee OA, although this has never been investigated. One study that examined the gait patterns of children aged 11–13 years attempted to test the knee kinetics with an intentional toe-in and toe-out gait and compare that to their normal gait patterns.19 They reported that the toe-in gait pattern increased the adduction moment, but there were no differences between the toe-out condition and the normal foot position condition; yet this study did not perform separate analyses of early- and late-stance values. Also, Lin et al.19 did not find a difference between the toe-out condition and normal foot position condition, which contradicts the current literature. This may be due to the fact that they did not perform separate analyses of both early- and late-stance curve parameters.

Although the effect of foot rotation on the knee's adduction moment has been investigated, to our knowledge, the effect of foot rotation on the shear forces has never been previously examined. Therefore, this study will examine the effect of both internal and external foot rotation on the knee adduction moment (KAM) as well as on the lateral–medial force (LMF) created during level walking.

Section snippets

Subjects

The participants were 11 (M: 6) healthy university students with no previous history of lower limb trauma or surgery. The university's Research Ethics Board approved the study and the participants provided informed consent. The average age of participants was 22.9 years (1.8) with an average height of 176.7 cm (11.5) and an average weight of 72.4 kg (14.4).

Gait analysis

Data were collected with a modified version of a three-dimensional gait analysis system that has previously been described and validated.20, 21

Results

Repeated measures ANOVA on the KAML and LMFL variables revealed a main effect for foot rotation and significance on all three individual contrasts; therefore all foot positions were significantly different. Thus, external rotation of the foot significantly decreased the magnitude of the KAM and LMF curves during late stance while internally rotating the foot increased their magnitude (Fig. 1 and Table 1). There was no significant main effect for the KAME or LMFE.

The uncorrected KAML and LMFL

Discussion

The results demonstrate the previously described relationship between foot rotation and the adduction moment during the late-stance phase of gait15, 16, 17, 18 and they also extend the relationship to include the internal rotation of the foot. They demonstrate that, as the foot is rotated externally, the adduction moment decreases and, when the foot is rotated internally, the adduction moment increases during late stance. The adduction moment is a good predictor of the ratio of

Practical implications

  • External rotation of the foot during gait shifts the load off the medial knee compartment, while internal rotation of the foot during gait shifts the load off the lateral knee compartment.

  • Interventions aimed at normalising the adduction moment and medial–lateral shear forces across the knee during gait may help reduce pain and delay the onset and progression of knee OA.

  • Knee OA patients are able to reduce the adduction moment at the knee much more than normal subjects during late stance,

References (26)

  • D.E. Hurwitz et al.

    Dynamic knee loads during gait predict proximal tibial bone distribution

    J Biomech

    (1998)
  • C.L. Hubley-Kozey et al.

    Neuromuscular alterations during walking in persons with moderate knee osteoarthritis

    J Electromyogr Kinesiol

    (2006)
  • T.P. Andriacchi et al.

    A framework for the in vivo pathomechanics of osteoarthritis at the knee

    Ann Biomed Eng

    (2004)
  • Cited by (63)

    • Frontal plane knee moment in clinical gait analysis: A systematic review on the effect of kinematic gait changes

      2022, Gait and Posture
      Citation Excerpt :

      As for the strategy to change the foot progression angle to lower KAMs, both in- and out-toeing can be effectively used as previously described in a different systematic review [18]. Summarizing from studies included in the current review, KAM1 can be reduced with toe-in gait [17,34], whereas KAM2 may be reduced by out-toeing gait [15,17]. Further, a more external foot progression angle (out-toeing) might be adopted with a wider step width gait pattern, to achieve a reduced knee moment [41].

    • Effect of trunk muscles fatigue on plantar pressure distribution in novice runners

      2021, Journal of Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      This increased loads on the lateral border of the foot following decreased foot progression angle could be transmitted to the proximal areas such as lateral compartment of the knee, that is previously reported by Koblauch et al., showing that the decreases in the foot progression angle increases compressive forces on the lateral compartment of the knee (Koblauch et al. 2013). This is a lateral shift of knee joint loading previously reported by Lynn et al., (Lynn, Kajaks, and Costigan 2008), Shull et al., (Shull et al. 2013) and Khan et al., (Khan, Khan, and Usman 2017), showing that gait with lesser progression angle reduces loading of medial compartment of the knee. In this study trunk muscles fatigue-induced changes in plantar loading were relatively small.

    • Effects of idiopathic flatfoot deformity on knee adduction moments during walking

      2021, Gait and Posture
      Citation Excerpt :

      On the other hand, KAM2 improved after flatfoot correction while arch height did not significantly increase. In terms of practical research, KAM is an important parameter as it is an indicator of knee joint loading and has been extensively investigated in the field of clinical gait analysis [10–14,20]. Several gait modifications and orthopedic malalignments, such as trunk lean and in-toeing, are known to influence KAM [28].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text