Elsevier

Experimental Gerontology

Volume 82, September 2016, Pages 112-119
Experimental Gerontology

Novel all-extremity high-intensity interval training improves aerobic fitness, cardiac function and insulin resistance in healthy older adults

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2016.06.009Get rights and content

Highlights

  • All-extremity high-intensity interval training (HIIT) is feasible in older adults.

  • HIIT over 8 weeks is safe and resulted in no adverse events.

  • HIIT improves aerobic fitness, ejection fraction, and insulin resistance.

Abstract

Aging is associated with decreased aerobic fitness and cardiac remodeling leading to increased risk for cardiovascular disease. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) on the treadmill has been reported to be more effective in ameliorating these risk factors compared with moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) in patients with cardiometabolic disease. In older adults, however, weight-bearing activities are frequently limited due to musculoskeletal and balance problems. The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility and safety of non-weight-bearing all-extremity HIIT in older adults. In addition, we tested the hypothesis that all-extremity HIIT will be more effective in improving aerobic fitness, cardiac function, and metabolic risk factors compared with all-extremity MICT. Fifty-one healthy sedentary older adults (age: 65 ± 1 years) were randomized to HIIT (n = 17), MICT (n = 18) or non-exercise control (CONT; n = 16). HIIT (4 × 4 min 90% of peak heart rate; HRpeak) and isocaloric MICT (70% of HRpeak) were performed on a non-weight-bearing all-extremity ergometer, 4 ×/week for 8 weeks under supervision. All-extremity HIIT was feasible in older adults and resulted in no adverse events. Aerobic fitness (peak oxygen consumption; VO2peak) and ejection fraction (echocardiography) improved by 11% (P < 0.0001) and 4% (P = 0.001), respectively in HIIT, while no changes were observed in MICT and CONT (P  0.1). Greater improvements in ejection fraction were associated with greater improvements in VO2peak (r = 0.57; P < 0.0001). Insulin resistance (homeostatic model assessment) decreased only in HIIT by 26% (P = 0.016). Diastolic function, body composition, glucose and lipids were unaffected (P  0.1). In conclusion, all-extremity HIIT is feasible and safe in older adults. HIIT, but not MICT, improved aerobic fitness, ejection fraction, and insulin resistance.

Introduction

Aging induces cardiac remodeling and changes in cardiac function that lead to increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) (Fleg and Strait, 2012). Improving aerobic fitness lowers the risk of CVD mortality (Lee et al., 2011), however, the optimal training regimen for improving aerobic fitness in older adults remains undefined. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has been reported to have superior effects on aerobic fitness, cardiac function, lipids and glucose control compared with moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) in patients with cardiometabolic disease (Molmen-Hansen et al., 2012, Rognmo et al., 2004, Tjonna et al., 2008, Wisloff et al., 2007). The HIIT protocol in these studies consists of 4-min intervals of high-intensity treadmill walking (usually “uphill”) interspersed with periods of moderate-intensity walking. However, older adults frequently experience balance and musculoskeletal problems (Gheno et al., 2012) which limit the feasibility of weight-bearing exercise and in particular high-intensity treadmill walking. Development of an alternative exercise modality for HIIT that avoids the age-related limitations of treadmill walking is necessary for older adults. The use of a stationary cycle eliminates balance and weight-bearing concerns, and is likely to be more suitable as a long-term exercise routine for older adults. More importantly, use of an all-extremity ergometer increases the active amount of muscle mass during exercise compared to lower extremity exercise, allows compensation for unilateral or bilateral lower extremity weakness or fatigue, and ultimately affords a larger proportion of older individuals to undergo HIIT.

Therefore, we sought to evaluate the feasibility and safety of performing HIIT on a non-weight-bearing all-extremity ergometer in previously sedentary older adults. In addition, we tested the hypothesis that 8 weeks of all-extremity HIIT will be more effective in improving aerobic fitness, cardiac function, and metabolic risk factors compared with all-extremity MICT in healthy sedentary older adults.

Section snippets

Subjects

Subjects were 55–79 years old, sedentary, non-smokers who were free of cardiovascular and other major clinical disease (e.g., diabetes, liver and renal disease) as assessed by medical history, physical examination, resting blood pressure, ECG and blood analysis (i.e., comprehensive metabolic panel, lipid panel, insulin, and complete blood count with differential). In addition, all subjects demonstrated normal ECG and blood pressure responses to a clinically-supervised diagnostic graded exercise

Feasibility and safety of novel all-extremity HIIT

Previously sedentary older adults completed 8 weeks of HIIT or MICT using synchronous arm and leg exercise on a non-weight-bearing air-braked ergometer. No adverse events occurred in HIIT or MICT groups (i.e., deaths, nonfatal serious events such as myocardial infarction and musculoskeletal problems, or other serious or non-serious health issues requiring hospitalization or medical treatment). However, during the first few HIIT or MICT exercise sessions the majority of subjects reported

Discussion

We have established that this novel approach of performing HIIT on a non-weight-bearing all-extremity ergometer is feasible in healthy sedentary older adults and safe. This is the first randomized controlled trial to provide evidence that non-weight-bearing all-extremity HIIT, but not MICT, improves aerobic fitness, cardiac systolic function, and insulin resistance without affecting body weight and composition in older adults who are free of cardiovascular and major clinical disease. Left

Conclusions

The present study demonstrates that HIIT on a non-weight-bearing all-extremity ergometer is feasible in previously sedentary older adults and safe. All-extremity HIIT is more effective in improving aerobic fitness, cardiac systolic function, and insulin resistance compared with isocaloric MICT. HIIT on a non-weight-bearing all-extremity ergometer represents a promising alternative to weight-bearing HIIT in sedentary older adults.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our gratitude to the study participants for their time and efforts. We would also like to thank John Larocca, Karen Mackay, Andrea Vasconez, Sofia Sofianos, Kevin Priddy, Andre Revell, Austin Nolz, Blake Dalley, Lily Malone, Jessica Howard and Lindsay Wainman who assisted with conducting this intervention.

This work was supported by NIH AG 050203 to DDC. The funding source had no involvement in preparation or completion of the study or writing of the article.

References (27)

  • M. Haykowsky et al.

    Effect of exercise training on peak aerobic power, left ventricular morphology, and muscle strength in healthy older women

    Journals of Gerontology Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

    (2005)
  • J. Helgerud et al.

    Aerobic high-intensity intervals improve VO2max more than moderate training

    Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.

    (2007)
  • D.L. Huggett et al.

    Maximal aerobic capacity testing of older adults: a critical review

    Journals of Gerontology Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

    (2005)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text