Letter to the editorISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—part I: ankle, hip, and spine
Introduction
Since November 1993, the Standardization and Terminology Committee (STC) of the International Society of Biomechanics (ISB) has begun its journey of developing a set of standards for reporting joint motion. Headed by Drs. Peter Cavanagh and Ge Wu in 1993, an initial decision was made to adopt the Joint Coordinate System (JCS), first proposed by Grood and Suntay in 1983 (Grood and Suntay, 1983), as the standard. This decision was publicized to the biomechanics community via Biomech-L, an electronic discussion network. With the enormous amount of support received from the Biomech-L subscribers, the STC then decided to move forward with this decision. A group of volunteers was recruited via Biomech-L who would like to participate in the effort of developing the JCS for each of the major joints in the body. To date, nine subcommittees involving a total of 25 people have been established and, so far, eight proposals have been completed. They include ankle, hip, spine, shoulder, elbow, hand and wrist, TMJ, and whole body.
There are two main reasons as to why these JCSs are established. First, there is a lack of standard for reporting joint motion in the field of biomechanics for human movement. This makes the comparisons among various studies difficult, if not impossible. Secondly, the use of JCS as proposed by Grood and Suntay has the advantage of reporting joint motions in clinically relevant terms. This makes the application and interpretation of biomechanical findings easier and more welcoming to clinicians.
Although all of the JCS recommendations have been published in various forms, such as in previous ISB Newsletters, and on the ISB Home Page, only a few of them have been test-used and subsequently revised. The purpose of this paper is to present these JCS definitions to the biomechanics community so as to encourage the use of these recommendations, to provide first hand feedback, and to facilitate the revisions. It is hoped that this process will help the biomechanics community to move towards the development and use of a set of widely acceptable standards for better communication among various research groups, and among biomechanists, physicians, physical therapists, and other related interest groups.
Section snippets
Overview of JCS
All recommendations of JCS for various joints follow the similar procedures as proposed by Grood and Suntay (1983). First, a Cartesian coordinate system (CCS) is established for each of the two adjacent body segments. The axes in these CCSs are defined based on bony landmarks that are either palpable or identifiable from X-rays, and follow the ISB general recommendations (Wu and Cavanagh, 1995). The common origin of both axis systems is the point of reference for the linear translation
Acknowledgements
Drs Michell Gatton (Queensland University of Technology, Australia) and Dr. Stuart McGill (University of Waterloo, Canada) made valuable suggestions on the JCS for the spine.
References (16)
- et al.
Position and orientation of bones during movementanatomical frame definition and determination
Clinical Biomechanics
(1995) - et al.
Validation of a functional method for the estimation of hip joint centre location
Journal of Biomechanics
(1999) - et al.
Three-dimensional flexibility and stiffness properties of the human thoracic spine
Journal of Biomechanics
(1976) - et al.
Force-deformation properties of human costo-sternal and costo-vertebral articulations
Journal of Biomechanics
(1974) - et al.
Hip joint center location from palpable bony landmarks—a cadaver study
Journal of Biomechanics
(1995) - et al.
Effects of hip joint centre mislocation on gait analysis results
Journal of Biomechanics
(2000) - et al.
ISB recommendations for standardization in the reporting of kinematic data
Journal of Biomechanics
(1995) - et al.
A comparison of the accuracy of several hip center location prediction methods
Journal of Biomechanics
(1990)
Cited by (2416)
Determining whether biomechanical variables that describe common ‘safe lifting’ cues are associated with low back loads
2024, Journal of Electromyography and KinesiologyThree-Dimensional Hinge Axis Orientation Contributes to Simultaneous Alignment Correction in All Three Anatomical Planes in Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy
2024, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation