How to test very soft biological tissues in extension?
Introduction
Mechanical properties of living tissues form a central subject in Biomechanics. Recent developments in robotics technology, especially the emergence of automatic surgical tools and robots (e.g. Brett et al., 1995) as well as advances in virtual reality techniques (Burdea, 1996) provide immediate and important applications to research into the mechanical properties of very soft tissues, such as brain, liver and kidney. These tissues have been largely neglected before because they do not bear mechanical loads. Mathematical models of brain tissue mechanical properties may find application, for example, in a surgical robot control system where the prediction of deformation is needed (Miller and Chinzei (1995), Miller and Chinzei (2000)); surgical operation planning and surgeon training systems based on the virtual reality techniques (Burdea, 1996 and references cited therein) where force feedback is needed; and in registration (Lavallée, 1995) where knowledge of local deformation is required.
There is a wealth of information available in the literature about the mechanical properties of brain tissue in-vitro (Ommaya, 1968; Estes and McElhaney, 1970; Galford and McElhaney, 1970; Pamidi and Advani, 1978; Bilston et al., 1997; Donnelly and Medige, 1997; Miller and Chinzei, 1997). Some information on liver and kidney tissue mechanical properties has also been published (e.g. Melvin et al., 1973; Farshad et al (1998), Farshad et al (1999); Miller, 2000). However, the experimental results available in literature are limited to compression, indentation and impact tests and to a lesser extent, torsional tests. To the best of the author's knowledge, there are no results in the literature concerning very soft tissue properties in tension. Why is that? The author believes that, besides technical problems with conducting extension tests on brain and other soft tissues, the main reason is that the analytical relation between the tensile stress machine head displacement and strain is not known for cylindrical samples with a low aspect ratio.
In this paper I develop the rigorous mathematical description of the deformation in the uniaxial extension experiment and derive the relation between the machine head displacement and strain needed for the constitutive law identification. It is claimed that the results obtained allow the analysis of uniaxial extension experiments performed on low aspect ratio cylindrical samples of soft biological tissues in an analogous way to that routinely used in the unconfined compression.
Section snippets
Extension experiment set-up
Typically, in experiments on brain tissue cylindrical samples of diameter ∼30 mm and height ∼10 mm are used (Miller and Chinzei, 1997). Steel pipe (30 mm diameter) with sharp edges is used to cut the samples. The faces of the cylindrical brain specimens are smoothed manually, using a surgical scalpel.
Uniaxial tension of brain (or other very soft tissue) can be performed in a testing stand sketched in Fig. 1. This particular geometry is dictated by the difficulties in attaching faces of cylindrical
Theoretical analysis of extension experiment
In extension experiment the kinematics of the deformation is complex, prohibiting the existence of the exact analytical solution for the deformation of the sample for any realistic constitutive law chosen to describe tissue mechanical properties. This, in the author’ opinion, is one of the reasons why there are no extension results for soft tissues published in the biomechanics literature. However, with a few reasonable assumptions an approximate solution can be found.
I consider a circular
Results
By differentiating Eq. (14) with respect to Z, Eq. (16) with respect to R, and equating the results one obtains a single ordinary differential equation for the shape of the deformed sample :Unfortunately, the solutions of Eq. (17) can be found only in the implicit form:
Discussion and conclusions
Two theoretical results presented in this paper have important implications for testing in biomechanics of very soft tissues. As shown above, in a uniaxial extension experiment, in the plane of symmetry Z=z=0 (see Fig. 2) the orthogonal state of deformation can be assumed. This state of deformation can be described, as in the case of the unconfined compression experiment (Miller and Chinzei, 1997), by a diagonal deformation gradient:Therefore, the
Acknowledgements
The financial support of the Australian Research Council, Japanese Science and Technology Agency and Japanese Agency for Industrial Science and Technology is gratefully acknowledged. The author would like to thank Dr Lynne Bilston and Professor Nhan Phan-Thien for very helpful discussions during the author's visit at the University of Sydney.
References (26)
- et al.
Linear viscoelastic properties of bovine brain tissue in shear
Biorheology
(1997) - et al.
Material characterization of the pig kidney in relation with the biomechanical analysis of renal trauma
Journal of Biomechanics
(1999) - et al.
A viscoelastic study of scalp, brain and dura
Journal of Biomechanics
(1970) - et al.
Effects of perfusion on the mechanical behavior of the brain exposed to hypergravity
Journal of Biomechanics
(1997) Constitutive model of brain tissue suitable for finite element analysis of surgical procedures
Journal of Biomechanics
(1999)Constitutive modelling of abdominal organs
Journal of Biomechanics
(2000)- et al.
Constitutive modelling of brain tissueexperiment and theory
Journal of Biomechanics
(1997) Mechanical properties of tissues of the nervous system
Journal of Biomechanics
(1968)- et al.
Elastomechanical characterization of brain tissues
Journal of Biomechanics
(1992) - Brett, P.N., Fraser, C.A., Henningan, M., Griffiths, M.V., Kamel, Y., 1995. Automatic surgical tools for penetrating...
Force and Touch feedback for Virtual Reality
Compression of swine brain tissueexperiment in-vitro
Journal of Mechanical Engineering Laberatory
Shear properties of human brain tissue
Transactions of ASME, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
Cited by (87)
Sample size considerations in soft tissue biomechanics
2023, Acta BiomaterialiaIntra-Articular Injections of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosomes and Hyaluronic Acid Improve Structural and Mechanical Properties of Repaired Cartilage in a Rabbit Model
2020, Arthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related SurgeryDeveloping a soft tissue surrogate for use in photoelastic testing
2019, Materials Today: ProceedingsCompressive mechanical characterization of non-human primate spinal cord white matter
2018, Acta BiomaterialiaCitation Excerpt :More importantly, relating machine head displacements to each sample’s strain is challenging and may have led to inaccuracies in strain calculations. Our assumption [14,44,47,48] was to consider the machine head displacement as the sample deformation which requires the sample’s transverse sections to remain plane in the loading process. The shear contact force generated between the white matter and the platen may have caused violations from the plane sections assumption.
Hyperelastic modeling of the human brain tissue: Effects of no-slip boundary condition and compressibility on the uniaxial deformation
2018, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical MaterialsCitation Excerpt :Even for non-glued samples in compression, the friction between the tissue and the crosshead surfaces can cause a level of inhomogeneity in compressive deformation of the sample (Miller, 2005). To appropriately compensate for deviation from a homogeneous elastic field assumption, Miller proposed a method in which the shape of the lateral deformation of the sample during no-slip boundary condition uniaxial deformation is calculated and incorporated in the deformation function for obtaining the material constants of the brain tissue (Miller, 2001, 2005; Miller and Chinzei, 2002). Some other researchers have used numerical analysis using finite element method and minimizing the objective function for the difference between simulation results and experimental data in an iterative loop to optimize the model parameter values (Moran et al., 2014).
Quantification of gravity-induced skin strain across the breast surface
2017, Clinical Biomechanics