Abstract
Objective The purpose of this study was to compare women’s levels of physical activity during early pregnancy and during the year before pregnancy, and to identify characteristics associated with discontinuing sports and exercise among women previously active during the year before pregnancy. Methods Data collected from 1,737 women enrolled in a prospective cohort study and who had no contraindications for exercise were included in this analysis. Measures of physical activity (including household and care-giving activities, active living and sports and exercise activities) during early pregnancy were compared to the year before pregnancy. Log binomial regression was used to identify factors associated with discontinuing sports and exercise during pregnancy. Results There was a statistically significant decrease in all summary measures of physical activity during early pregnancy. The largest decreases were observed in sports and exercise activity. Among women active before pregnancy, age <35 years, multiparity, less than university education, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 and lower levels of pre-pregnancy exercise were associated with discontinuing sports and exercise activities during pregnancy. Conclusion Most women reduced their physical activity level during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy compared with their level of activity during the year prior to pregnancy, particularly for sports and exercise, although a small proportion of women in this study actually increased their activity in this area during early pregnancy. Participation in sports and exercise activity during pregnancy is potentially modifiable and could favorably impact perinatal health and maternal post-partum weight. The results of this study suggests that pregnancy is an event that leads to a decrease in physical activity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Leisure activity, such as sports and exercise, is recommended for its many health benefits including weight control, and reduced risk of hypertension, cardiovascular disease and Type 2 diabetes [1]. Benefits of participation in sports and exercise activity may also extend to pregnant women. Increasing evidence suggests that exercise plays a role in reducing the risk of pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia [2], gestational diabetes [3, 4] and preterm delivery [5], and may help prevent excess pregnancy weight gain [6] and post-partum weight retention [7]. Currently, healthy women with uncomplicated pregnancies are advised to continue pre-pregnancy sports and exercise activities, or begin a program of regular activity, avoiding activities that could result in loss of balance or fetal trauma [8, 9].
Overall, the literature indicates that participation in sports and exercise is lower among pregnant women than non-pregnant women [7, 10–15], but little information is available on factors associated with continuing exercise during pregnancy. Only a few studies have compared levels of sports and exercise before pregnancy with sports and exercise levels during pregnancy, and identified the determinants of continuing (or stopping) these activities during pregnancy [13–15]. High BMI has been associated with both increased [14, 15] and decreased level of sports and exercise during pregnancy [13], compared to pre-pregnancy levels. Other factors might influence the level of physical activity during pregnancy. For instance, women who perceive physical activity during pregnancy as risky to maternal or fetal health would have a higher propensity to discontinue exercise activity [16]. Also, early pregnancy symptoms, such as nausea and fatigue, might be expected to negatively impact physical activity, although this is not always the case [7]. Moreover, other aspects of physical activity, such as household and care-giving activity have received little attention [17]. More research is needed to quantify and understand the reasons for changes in physical activity levels during pregnancy, compared to pre-pregnancy, among healthy pregnant women, particularly with respect to modifiable factors.
The purpose of this study was to quantify changes in level of physical activity during early pregnancy (up to 20 weeks’ gestation) compared to the year before pregnancy in a cohort of women. We additionally sought to identify characteristics associated with discontinuing participation in sports and exercise activities during pregnancy among women previously active in the year before pregnancy.
Methods
This study was a secondary analysis of data originating from a prospective cohort study of pregnant women, recruited at <20 weeks’ gestation between October 2002 and July 2005 at the IWK Health Centre in Halifax, NS, Canada. Detailed methods have been previously described [18]. In summary, women were asked to complete and return a self-administered questionnaire during the 20th week of pregnancy (mean gestational age when questionnaires were returned was 21.4 weeks), which collected information on socioeconomic factors, lifestyle (including physical activity), chronic medical conditions and past pregnancy history. After delivery, additional data were collected from medical records. This analysis included only women whose pregnancy advanced beyond 20 weeks’ gestation, who returned their study questionnaires, and who had no contraindications to sports and exercise during pregnancy. Contraindications to exercise during pregnancy were based on Canadian guidelines and included preterm labor or incompetent cervix before 20 weeks requiring hospital admission, onset of hypertension requiring medication prior to 20 weeks, triplets or higher order multiple gestation, 2nd trimester bleeding or other serious medical disorders [8]. These exclusions were based on data obtained from the medical chart after delivery, with the exception of the 2nd trimester bleeding and other serious medical disorders, which additionally used data collected in the study questionnaire.
Questionnaire items pertaining to physical activity were adapted from the Kaiser Physical Activity Survey (KPAS) [19], which has been validated in non-pregnant [17] and pregnant women [20]. The KPAS and details regarding scoring have been published elsewhere [17, 19, 21]. Briefly, the KPAS measures participation in four activity domains: household and family care (e.g., routine cleaning, meal preparation, childcare, etc.), active living (e.g., walking/cycling to work, etc.), sports and exercise, and occupation. There are 11 questions in the KPAS pertaining to the household and family care domain, 4 questions pertaining to active living, 8 questions (or more, depending on the number of sports and exercises the women participated in) pertaining to sports and exercise and 8 questions pertaining to occupation. Each question is assigned a value of 1–5, indicating low to increasingly higher levels of activity or participation. An index score ranging from 1 to 5 is generated for each domain by summing the score for each individual question within a domain and dividing by the number of items. The overall KPAS score is the sum of the index-specific scores.
Women were asked to answer the KPAS questions reflecting the first 20 weeks of pregnancy as well as the year preceding pregnancy with the exception of information on occupation, which was only collected for the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. Thus, the overall KPAS score in this study is a 3-index score that excludes occupational activity [19].
The sports and exercise index of the KPAS contains detailed questions regarding participation in up to three activities such as walking, jogging, conditioning exercise, gardening and organized sports. The sport score, which is the sum of metabolic equivalent level (assigned using a published compendium [22, 23]) by frequency and time across all activities, is one of the items used to calculate the sports and exercise index score. It was also used independently in this study to estimate the level of participation in sports and exercise. A high level of sports and exercise activity was defined using the 75th percentile of the pre-pregnancy sport score.
For both of the time points of interest (the year before pregnancy and during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy) women were asked whether or not they participated in sports and exercise activity and they were provided with a list of examples of different physical activities. If they reported “yes” they were subsequently asked to complete the details required by the KPAS for up to three specific activities. It was these questions (“During the year before this pregnancy, did you participate in any sports or exercise activities such as…?” and “So far during this pregnancy, did you participate in any sports or exercise activities such as…“) that were used to determine whether previously active women continued or discontinued sports and exercise activity during early pregnancy (e.g., an answer of “Yes” in the first question and “No” to the second question would define discontinuing sports and exercise.
Median scores and 25th and 75th percentile scores were computed for pre-pregnancy and early pregnancy for each index (household and family care, active living, sports and exercise). The mean difference in the within-woman score for each index was used to quantify the change in activity between pre-pregnancy and the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. Log binomial regression was used to estimate the relative risk (RR) of discontinuing sports and exercise during early pregnancy among the subset of women who reported participation in sports and exercise prior to pregnancy [24, 25]. Factors that were evaluated included those that had been noted in previous studies (e.g., parity, BMI, education, maternal age, maternal smoking) and factors not previously identified in the literature but were collected as part of the overall cohort study (e.g., previous pregnancy history, bleeding during the current pregnancy). Initially, unadjusted RRs and 95%CI were calculated, followed by a backward stepwise approach to determine the most parsimonious multivariate model. Only those risk factors that were significantly associated (P < 0.05) with the outcome, based on the likelihood ratio test, were retained in the final model.
All analyses were performed using SAS Version 8.2 software for Windows (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The study received approval from the IWK Health Centre Research Ethics Board and participants provided written informed consent.
Results
Of the 2,314 women invited to participate in the original study, 2,200 (95.1%) agreed and provided consent. Following recruitment, 30 women were excluded: 11 withdrew, 16 terminated their pregnancy and 3 were later determined to have been >20 weeks’ gestation at recruitment (using ultrasound dating). We further excluded 94 women with an early pregnancy loss (<20 weeks’ gestation) and 233 women who did not return a questionnaire. Finally, 106 women with contraindications to exercise during pregnancy were excluded leaving 1,737 women with low-risk pregnancies available for this analysis. Women were recruited at a mean gestational age of 13.7 weeks (SD 4.1; range 4–20 weeks). Approximately 10% of women returned their questionnaire after 25 weeks’ gestation. Basic demographic characteristics of the women in this study are shown in Table 1.
Median scores for KPAS indices, shown in Table 2, generally decreased during pregnancy compared to the year before pregnancy, with the largest decrease observed for the sports and exercise index (mean difference = −0.71, 95%CI = −0.75, −0.70. Seventy-one percent of women (71.3%) reported participation in sports and exercise activity before pregnancy; however, less than half of women (47.4%) reported that they participated in sports and exercise during early pregnancy. Among the women who were active in sports and exercise before pregnancy, 62.2% continued to participate during their pregnancy, with an even higher rate among those women with a pre-pregnancy sport score in the top quartile (76.1%, data not shown). Among the women who did not report participation in sports and exercise activity during the year before pregnancy, 11.1% initiated sports and exercise for the first time during early pregnancy (Fig. 1).
Table 3 shows the unadjusted and adjusted analysis for characteristics associated with discontinuing sports and exercise activities during early pregnancy among a subgroup of women who participated in sports and exercise activity during the year before pregnancy. Discontinuing sports and exercise activities during pregnancy was significantly associated with maternal age <35 years, no university education, BMI ≥30 kg/m2, multiparity (≥1 previous viable pregnancy) and a pre-pregnancy sport score <75th percentile.
Discussion
The results of this study suggest that pregnancy is an event that leads to a decrease in physical activity. Although women reduced their levels of activity related to household tasks, care-giving and active living, the decrease in overall physical activity was chiefly realized through reduced participation in sports and exercise.
Although we observed that younger women, with lower education, and a higher pre-pregnancy BMI were significantly more likely to discontinue sports and exercise during pregnancy, the strongest predictor of this behavior change was the level of pre-pregnancy activity. Despite very different study populations, this result is consistent with the findings of another recent study (with a focus on Latino women) that used the KPAS to measure women’s physical activity before pregnancy and in early and mid-pregnancy [15]. Our analysis was based on a cross-sectional analysis of data collected at about 20 weeks’ gestation, which potentially limits the conclusions regarding a temporal relationship between the factors we identified as associated with discontinuing sports and exercise.
Pregnancy typically motivates women to make changes toward healthier lifestyles [26]. However, while getting a good night’s sleep, abstaining from alcohol consumption and reducing smoking are lifestyle changes with high perceived importance in pregnant women, it seems that fewer women attribute the same level of importance to regular exercise [16]. Nevertheless, we did not uniformly observe reduced activity during pregnancy. A small proportion of women in this study initiated exercise activity for the first time during pregnancy. Although this change in behavior did not greatly impact activity scores due to participation in less intense types of exercise, it is noteworthy that some previously inactive women were motivated by pregnancy to increase their level of activity. One possible reason for initiating a more active lifestyle during pregnancy is for weight loss, which has been reported among overweight women [27]. This may be supported by our results since the subgroup of women who initiated sports and exercise in pregnancy had the highest rate of moderate/extreme obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2, 16.1%) of all women.
Strengths of this study include the availability of physical activity data that were collected during mid-pregnancy, when the outcome of the pregnancy was unknown. Using the comprehensive KPAS instrument, this study collected detailed information on several domains of physical activity for women.
This study was limited by our inability to use objective measures of physical activity that did not involve subject recall. Nevertheless, the KPAS has been previously found to be reliable and valid in non-pregnant [17] and pregnant [20] women. When the participants completed the questionnaire, they were simultaneously asked about activity level during pregnancy and activity during the year before pregnancy. Since one time period in question was very recent and other time period was further distant in the past, it is possible that the reliability of correctly recalling activity measures for the two time periods was different. In addition, about 10% of the women returned their questionnaire after 25 weeks’ gestation. Although we do not know when these women actually completed their questionnaire (e.g., they could have completed it at 20 weeks, but mailed it later), it is possible that pregnancy complications or other factors arising later in pregnancy could have affected recall pertaining to their activity level.
Another limitation concerns the small proportion of women that did not return the questionnaire. Compared to the women included in this analysis, the non-responders were significantly more likely to be <25 years and to smoke during pregnancy, and less likely to be nulliparous or married. Assuming that some of these factors are associated with participation in sports and exercise activity during pregnancy [11, 12, 15], this may have resulted in an overestimate of our participation rates. We did not collect information on symptoms of early pregnancy, such as nausea or fatigue that may have influenced level of activity [7, 28, 29], nor on occupation during the year before pregnancy, which precluded analysis of change in occupation-related physical activity in early pregnancy. Finally, we used a single measure for physical activity level reflecting the first 20 weeks of pregnancy but there may have been differences in activity levels within this time period. As well, we did not assess women’s physical activity at later time points during the pregnancy and it is possible that women increased their physical activity during mid-pregnancy [15].
This study was conducted in the largest city in Nova Scotia in a hospital where half of the deliveries in the province occur each year. The proportion of women in this study who were ≥35 years (24%) was higher than for Halifax County (18%) during the same time period; however, the rates of nulliparity, smoking during pregnancy and pre-pregnancy weight ≥90 kg were almost identical (unpublished data: Reproductive Care Program of Nova Scotia, November 2006) suggesting that these results are generalizable to the population of pregnant women in Halifax County, and possibly to urban populations of pregnant women in the rest of Canada.
Conclusion
In summary, we found that most women altered their physical activity level during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy compared with their level of activity during the year prior to pregnancy. The changes made by most women occurred in the direction of reduced activity, particularly for sports and exercise, although a small proportion of women in this study actually increased their activity in this area during early pregnancy. Further research is needed to understand the public health importance of previously active women who become inactive during pregnancy, versus that of relatively sedentary women who become even more inactive during pregnancy. Although some of the factors we observed that were associated with discontinuing sports and exercise during pregnancy are not readily modifiable, such as education, age and parity, participation itself in sports and exercise activity during pregnancy is potentially modifiable and could favorably impact perinatal health and maternal post-partum weight. Therefore, further research should be directed toward understanding women’s reasons for both discontinuing regular sports and exercise activity after becoming pregnant and for initiating sports and exercise during pregnancy.
References
Department of Health and Human Services. (1996). Physical activity and health: A report of the Surgeon Genera. Atlanta: National Cancer Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.
Sorensen, T. K., Williams, M. A., Lee, I. M., Dashow, E. E., Thompson, M. L., & Luthy, D. A. (2003). Recreational physical activity during pregnancy and risk of preeclampsia. Hypertension, 41, 1273–1280. doi:10.1161/01.HYP.0000072270.82815.91.
Dempsey, J. C., Butler, C. L., Sorensen, T. K., Lee, I. M., Thompson, M. L., Miller, R. S., et al. (2004). A case–control study of maternal recreational physical activity and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 66, 203–215. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2004.03.010.
Oken, E., Ning, Y., Rifas-Shiman, S. L., Radesky, J. S., Rich-Edwards, J. W., & Gillman, M. W. (2006). Associations of physical activity and inactivity before and during pregnancy with glucose tolerance. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 108, 1200–1207.
Evenson, K. R., Siega-Riz, A. M., Savitz, D. A., Leiferman, J. A., & Thorp, J. M., Jr. (2002). Vigorous leisure activity and pregnancy outcome. Epidemiology (Cambridge Mass), 13, 653–659. doi:10.1097/00001648-200211000-00009.
Polley, B. A., Wing, R. R., & Sims, C. J. (2002). Randomized controlled trial to prevent excessive weight gain in pregnant women. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders, 26, 1494–1502. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0802130.
Pereira, M. A., Rifas-Shiman, S. L., Kleinman, K. P., Rich-Edwards, J. W., Peterson, K. E., & Gillman, M. W. (2007). Predictors of change in physical activity during and after pregnancy. Project viva. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32, 312–319. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2006.12.017.
Davies, G. A. L., Wolfe, L. A., Mottola, M. F., & MacKinnon, C. (2003). Joint SOGC/CSEP clinical practice guideline: Exercise in pregnancy and the postpartum period. Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology, 28, 330–341.
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 267. (2002). Exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 99, 171–173. doi:10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01749-5.
Evenson, K. R., Savitz, D. A., & Huston, S. L. (2004). Leisure-time physical activity among pregnant women in the US. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 18, 400–407. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2004.00595.x.
Ning, Y., Williams, M. A., Dempsey, J. C., Sorensen, T. K., Frederick, I. O., & Luthy, D. A. (2003). Correlates of recreational physical activity in early pregnancy. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 13, 385–393. doi:10.1080/713605926.
Zhang, J., & Savitz, D. A. (1996). Exercise during pregnancy among US women. Annals of Epidemiology, 6, 53–59. doi:10.1016/1047-2797(95)00093-3.
Mottola, M. F., & Campbell, M. K. (2003). Activity patterns during pregnancy. Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology, 28, 642–653.
Hinton, P. S., & Olson, C. M. (2001). Predictors of pregnancy-associated change in physical activity in a rural white population. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 5, 7–14. doi:10.1023/A:1011315616694.
Chasan-Taber, L., Schmidt, M. D., Pekow, P., Sternfeld, B., Manson, J., & Markenson, G. (2007). Correlates of physical activity in pregnancy among Latina women. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 11, 353–363. doi:10.1007/s10995-007-0201-8.
Clarke, P. E., & Gross, H. (2004). Women’s behaviour, beliefs and information sources about physical exercise in pregnancy. Midwifery, 20, 133–141. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2003.11.003.
Ainsworth, B. E., Sternfeld, B., Richardson, M. T., & Jackson, K. (2000). Evaluation of the Kaiser physical activity survey in women. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 32, 1327–1338. doi:10.1097/00005768-200007000-00022.
Dodds, L., Fell, D. B., Dooley, K. C., Armson, B. A., Allen, A. C., Nassar, B. A., et al. (2008). The effect of homocysteine level and other factors in early pregnancy on gestational hypertensive disorders. Clinical Chemistry, 54, 326–334.
Sternfeld, B., Ainsworth, B. E., & Quesenberry, C. P. (1999). Physical activity patterns in a diverse population of women. Preventive Medicine, 28, 313–323. doi:10.1006/pmed.1998.0470.
Schmidt, M. D., Freedson, P. S., Pekow, P., Roberts, D., Sternfeld, B., & Chasan-Taber, L. (2006). Validation of the Kaiser physical activity survey in pregnant women. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 38, 42–50. doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000181301.07516.d6.
Baecke, J. A. H., Burema, J., & Fritjers, J. E. R. (1982). A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 36, 936–942.
Ainsworth, B. E., Haskell, W. L., Whitt, M. C., Irwin, M. L., Swartz, A. M., Strath, S. J., et al. (2000). Compendium of physical activities: An update of activity codes and MET intensities. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 32, S498–S516. doi:10.1097/00005768-200009001-00009.
Ainsworth, B. E., Haskell, W. L., Leon, A. S., Jacobs, D. R., Montoye, H. J., Sallis, J. F., et al. (1993). Compendium of physical activities: Classification of energy costs of human physical activities. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 25, 71–80. doi:10.1249/00005768-199301000-00011.
McNutt, L. A., Wu, C., Xue, X., & Hafner, J. P. (2003). Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. American Journal of Epidemiology, 157, 940–943. doi:10.1093/aje/kwg074.
Spiegelman, D., & Hertzmark, E. (2005). Easy SAS calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences. American Journal of Epidemiology, 162, 199–200. doi:10.1093/aje/kwi188.
Higgins, P., Frank, B., & Brown, M. (1994). Changes in health behaviours made by pregnant women. Health Care for Women International, 15, 149–156.
Cogswell, M. E., Serdula, M. K., Mokdad, A. H., & Williamson, D. F. (1996). Attempted weight loss during pregnancy. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders, 20, 373–375.
Symons Downs, D., & Hausenblas, H. A. (2004). Women’s exercise beliefs and behaviors during their pregnancy and postpartum. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 49, 138–144. doi:10.1016/S1526-9523(03)00495-1.
Symons Downs, D., & Ulbrecht, J. S. (2006). Understanding exercise beliefs and behaviors in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care, 29, 236–240. doi:10.2337/diacare.29.02.06.dc05-1262.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. While this study was being conducted, LD and KSJ were supported by Clinical Research Scholar Awards from Dalhousie University and New Investigator Awards from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fell, D.B., Joseph, K.S., Armson, B.A. et al. The Impact of Pregnancy on Physical Activity Level. Matern Child Health J 13, 597–603 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-008-0404-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-008-0404-7