Abstract
Measurement of human posture and movement is an important area of research in the bioengineering and rehabilitation fields. Various attempts have been initiated for different clinical application goals, such as diagnosis of pathological posture and movements, assessment of pre- and post-treatment efficacy and comparison of different treatment protocols. Image-based methods for measurements of human posture and movements have been developed, such as the radiography, photogrammetry, optoelectric technique and video analysis. However, it is found that these methods are complicated to set up, time-consuming to operate and could only be applied in laboratory environments. This study introduced a method of using a posture monitoring system in estimating the spinal curvature changes during trunk movements on the sagittal and coronal planes and providing trunk posture monitoring during daily activities. The system consisted of three sensor modules, each with one tri-axial accelerometer and three uni-axial gyroscopes orthogonally aligned, and a digital data acquisition and feedback system. The accuracy of this system was tested with a motion analysis system (Vicon 370) in calibration with experimental setup and in trunk posture measurement with nine human subjects, and the performance of the posture monitoring system during daily activities with two human subjects was reported. The averaged root mean squared differences between the measurements of the system and motion analysis system were found to be <1.5° in dynamic calibration, and <3.1° for the sagittal plane and ≤2.1° for the coronal plane in estimation of the trunk posture change during trunk movements. The measurements of the system and the motion analysis system was highly correlated (>0.999 for dynamic calibration and >0.829 for estimation of spinal curvature change in domain planes of movement during flexion and lateral bending). With the sensing modules located on the upper trunk, mid-trunk and the pelvic levels, the inclination of trunk segment and the change of spinal curvature in trunk movements could be estimated. The posture information of five subjects was recorded at 30 s intervals during daily activity over a period of 3 days and 2 h a day. The preliminary results demonstrated that the subjects could improve their posture when feedback signals were provided. The posture monitoring system could be used for the purpose of posture monitoring during daily activity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bazzarelli M, Durdle NG, Lou E, Raso J (2001) A low power hybrid posture monitoring system. Elect Comput Eng 2:13–16
Bull AMJ, McGregor AH (2000) Measuring spinal motion in rowers: the use of an electromagnetic device. Clin Biomech 15:772–776
Chockalingam N, Dangerfield P (2003) Non-invasive measurements of scoliosis and the spine: a review of the literature. Int J Therapy Rehabil 10(12):554–562
Dworkin B, Miller NE, Dworkin N (1985) Behavioral method for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Proc Nat Acad Sci 82:2493–2497
Eddy DS, Sparks DR (1998) Application of MEMS technology in automative sensors and actuator. Proc IEEE 86(8):1747–1755
Gracovetsky S, Newman N, Pawlowsky M, Lanzo V, Davey B, Robinson L (1995) A database for estimating normal spinal motion derived from noninvasive measurements. Spine 20(9):1036–1046
Lee RYM (2001) Kinematics of rotational mobilization of the lumbar spine. Clin Biomech 16:481–488
Lee RYW, Laprade J, Fung EHK (2003) A real-time gyroscopic system for three-dimensional measurement of lumbar spine motion. Med Eng Phys 25:817–824
Lobel WY (1967) Measurement of spinal posture and range of spinal movement. Ann Phys Med 9(3):103–110
Lou E, Bazzarelli M, Hill D, Durdle N (2001) A low power accelerometer used to improve posture. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Canadian conference on electrical & computer engineering, pp 1385–1389
Lou E, Raso J, Hill D, Durdle N, Moreau M (2002) Spine-straight device for the treatment of kyphosis. Stud Health Technol Inf Res Spinal Deformities 4:401–404
Mannion A, Troke M (1999) A comparison of two motion analysis devices used in the measurement of lumbar spinal mobility. Clin Biomech 14:612–619
McGregor AH, McCarthy ID, Hughes SP (1995) Motion characteristics of the lumbar spine in the normal population. Spine 20(22):2421–2428
Nevins RJ, Durdle NG, Raso VJ (2002) A posture monitoring system using accelerometers. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Canadian conference on electrical & computer engineering, pp 1087–1092
Pearcy M (1986) Measurement of back and spinal mobility. Clin Biomech 1:44–51
Pearcy MJ, Gill JM, Whittle MW, Johnson GR (1987) Dynamic back movement measured using a three-dimensional television system. J Biomech 20(10):943–949
Ployon A, Lavaste F, Maurel N, Skalli W, Roland-Gosselin A, Dubousset J, Zeller R (1997) In-vivo experimental research into the pre- and post-operative behavior of the scoliosis spine. Hum Mov Sci 16:299–230
Roetenberg D, Luinge HJ, Baten CTM, Veltink PH (2005) Compensation of magnetic disturbances improves inertial and magnetic sensing of human body segment orientation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 13(3):395–405
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Research Committee of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University. The authors are grateful to Dr. Alan Lam, engineers of Sengital Limited and Prof. Daniel Chow for their technical support and advices.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Mathematical section for auto-reset algorithm
where AccX, AccY and AccZ are signals of accelerometer, and Tacc is tilting angle derived from the signals of accelerometer.
where ωX, ω Y and ω Z are signals of gyroscopes, ωgyro are angular velocity.
where Tangle is angle calculated with auto-reset algorithm (Fig. 10), S(t) is the rectified signals derived from the variation of the Tacc, t is the index of time, the value of N is 5 and the threshold is 1 which are derived from the experimental results.
Calculation of the trunk posture change (motion analysis system)
The parameters of the trunk posture measurement were calculated based on several axis systems, including thoracic axis system (X ut, Y ut and Z ut), lumbar axis system (X lt, Y lt and Z lt), and spinal axis system (X s, Y s and Z s). The X, Y and Z axes constructed a right-handed Cartesian coordinate system and point to the anatomical directions:
X to anatomical right side, Y to anatomical anterior direction, Z to anatomical superior.
The regional trunk posture change of thoracic and lumbar spine was calculated based on the thoracic and lumbar axis system. The sign of angle was adopted as flexion and lateral bending to right were considered to be positive, and movement in opposite directions were represented by negative value for all data. Kinematic parameters, including the peak value and angular velocity of the trunk movements and, were calculated from the data of the motion analysis system and were documented for reference. The angular velocity of the trunk movements was defined as the angular velocity of the projection of the line formed by C7 and the sacrum (S2) on the sagittal and coronal planes of the pelvic axis system.
Inter-segmental angles (θ i ) is formed with three consecutive retro-reflective markers, where α j is the projection angle relative to y-axis and x-axis of the thoracic axis system for thoracic region and lumbar axis system for lumbar region on the sagittal plane and coronal plane, respectively (Figs. 11, 12).
For sagittal plane,
where y and r are y-coordinate and magnitude of the vector which formed with 2 consecutive markers respectively
where θ and N is an inter-segmental angle and number of reflective markers at the subject’s back in the specific trunk region respectively
For coronal plane,
where x and r are x-coordinate and magnitude of the vector which formed with 2 consecutive markers respectively
where θ and N is an inter-segmental angle and number of reflective markers at the subject’s back in the specific trunk region respectively
Trunk angle (β) is a sum of total inter-segmental angles.
where θ and N is an inter - segmental angle and number of reflective markers at the subject’s back in the specific trunk region respectively
The trunk posture changes (δ) during trunk movements on the sagittal and coronal planes were estimated by subtraction of the trunk angle at initial time (β0) from those at the spontaneous time (β T ).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wong, W.Y., Wong, M.S. Trunk posture monitoring with inertial sensors. Eur Spine J 17, 743–753 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0586-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0586-0