Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Computer simulation of stress distribution in the metatarsals at different inversion landing angles using the finite element method

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Metatarsal fracture is one of the most common foot injuries, particularly in athletes and soldiers, and is often associated with landing in inversion. An improved understanding of deformation of the metatarsals under inversion landing conditions is essential in the diagnosis and prevention of metatarsal injuries. In this work, a detailed three-dimensional (3D) finite element foot model was developed to investigate the effect of inversion positions on stress distribution and concentration within the metatarsals. The predicted plantar pressure distribution showed good agreement with data from controlled biomechanical tests. The deformation and stresses of the metatarsals during landing at different inversion angles (normal landing, 10 degree inversion and 20 degree inversion angles) were comparatively studied. The results showed that in the lateral metatarsals stress increased while in the medial metatarsals stress decreased with the angle of inversion. The peak stress point was found to be near the proximal part of the fifth metatarsal, which corresponds with reported clinical observations of metatarsal injuries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ekrol I, Court-Brown CM (2004) Fractures of the base of the 5th metatarsal. The Foot 14:96–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Popovic N, Jalali A, Georis P, Gillet P (2005) Proximal fifth metatarsal diaphyseal stress fracture in football players. J Foot Ankle Surg 11:135–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Milgrom C, Giladi M, Stein M, Kashtan H, Margulies JY, Chisin R (1985) Stress fractures in military recruits. A prospective study showing an unusually high incidence. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67:732–735

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Logan AJ, Dabke H, Finlay D, Makwana N (2007) Fifth metatarsal base fractures: a simple classification. J Foot Ankle Surg 13:30–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mađarević M, Kolundžić R, Trkulja V, Mirković M, Pećina M (2009) Biomechanical analysis of functional adaptation of metatarsal bones in statically deformed feet. Int Orthop 33(1):157–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Raikin SM, Slenker N, Ratigan B (2008) The association of a varus hindfoot and fracture of the fifth metatarsal metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction: the Jones fracture. Am J Sports Med 36(7):1367–1372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Watson AWS (1999) Ankle sprains in players of the field-games Gaelic football and hurling. Sports Med Phys Fitness 36:66–70

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pontaga I (2004) Ankle joint evertor–invertor muscle torque ratio decrease due to recurrent lateral ligament sprains. Clin Biomech 19:760–762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. De Cock A, De Clercq D, Willems T, Witvrouw E (2005) Temporal characteristics of foot roll-over during barefoot jogging: reference data for young adults. Gait Posture 21:432–439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grimston SK, Nigg BM, Fisher V, Ajemian SV (1994) External loads throughout a 45-minute run in stress fracture and non-stress fracture runners. J Biomech 27:668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bennell K, Crossley K, Jayarajan J (2004) Ground reaction forces and bone parameters in females with tibial stress fracture. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36:397–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wright IC, Neptune RR, van den Bogert AJ, Nigg BM (2000) The influence of foot positioning on ankle sprains. J Biomech 33:513–519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Raspovic A, Newcombe L, Lloyd J, Dalton E (2000) Effect of customized insoles on vertical plantar pressures in sites of previous neuropathic ulceration in the diabetic foot. The Foot 10:133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bus SA, de Lange A (2005) A comparison of the 1-step, 2-step, and 3-step protocols for obtaining barefoot plantar pressure data in the diabetic neuropathic foot. Clin Biomech 20:892–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gefen A, Megido-Ravid M, Itzchak Y, Arcan M (2000) Biomechanical analysis of the three-dimensional foot structure during gait: a basic tool for clinical applications. J Biomech Eng 122:630–639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen WP, Tang FT, Ju CW (2001) Stress distribution of the foot during mid-stance to push-off in barefoot gait: a 3-D finite element analysis. Clin Biomech 16:614–620

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheung JT, Zhang M, An K (2005) A 3-dimensional finite element model of the human foot and ankle for insole design. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:353–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu LJ (2007) Nonlinear finite element analysis for musculoskeletal biomechanics of medial and lateral plantar longitudinal arch of Virtual Chinese Human after plantar ligamentous structure failures. Clin Biomech 22:221–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gefen A (2003) Plantar soft tissue loading under the medial metatarsals in the standing diabetic foot. Med Eng Phys 25:491–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gu YD, Li JS (2005) Finite element analysis of the instep fatigue trauma in the high-heeled gait. World J Model Simul 2:117–122

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yu J, Cheung JT, Fan Y, Zhang Y, Leung AK, Zhang M (2008) Development of a finite element model of female foot for high-heeled shoe design. Clin Biomech 23:31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Erdemir A, Viveiros ML, Cavanagh PR (2003) A numerical experimental approach for characterising subject specific hyperelastic properties of the heel pad. In: Proceedings of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Summer Bioengineering Conference. Key Biscayne, FL

  23. Goske S, Erdemir A, Petre M, Budhabhatti S, Cavanagh PR (2006) Reduction of plantar heel pressures: Insole design using finite element analysis. J Biomech 39:2363–2370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jacob S, Patil MK (1999) Stress analysis in three-dimensional foot models of normal and diabetic neuropathy. Front Med Biol Eng 9:211–227

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Platzer W (2002) Color atlas and textbook of human anatomy locomotor system, 5th ed. Thieme, New York

  26. Clapper M, O’Brien T, Lyons P (1995) Fractures of the fifth metatarsal: analysis of a fracture registry. Clin Orthop 315:238–241

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cheung JTM, Zhang M, An K, Fan YB (2005) Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the foot during standing—a material sensitivity study. J Biomech 38:1045–1054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ledoux WR, Blevins JJ (2007) The compressive material properties of the plantar soft tissue. J Biomeca 40:2975–2981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lemmon D, Shiang TY, Hashmi A, Ulbrecht JS, Cavanagh PR (1997) The effect of insoles in therapeutic footwear: a finite element approach. J Biomech 30:615–620

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lehman R, Torg J, Pavlov H, DeLee J (1987) Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal distal to the tuberosity: a review. Foot Ankle 7:245–252

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Weinfeld SB, Haddad SL, Myerson MS (1997) Metatarsal stress fractures. Clin Sports Med 16:319–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. LaBella CR (2007) Common acute sports-related lower extremity injuries in children and adolescents. Clin Pediat Emerg Med 1:31–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Torg JS, Balduini FC, Zelko RR (1984) Fractures at the base of the fifth metatarsal distal to the tuberosity: classification and guidelines for non-surgical and surgical management. J Bone Joint Surg 66:209–214

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zelko AR, Torg JS, Rachun A (1979) Proximal diaphyseal fractures of the fifth metatarsal-treatment of the fractures and their complications in athletes. Am J Sports Med 7:95–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Richli WR, Rosenthal DJ (1984) Avulsion fractures of the fifth metatarsal: experimental study of patho-mechanics. Am J Roentgenol 145:889–891

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pao D, Keats T, Dussault R (2000) Avulsion fracture of the base of the fifth metatarsal not seen on conventional radiography of the foot: the need for an additional projection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:549–552

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Engineering, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK

    Y. D. Gu & X. J. Ren

  2. School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 2ET, UK

    M. J. Lake

  3. Human Movement Research Center, Zhejiang College of Sports, Zhejiang, 311231, China

    Y. D. Gu & J. S. Li

  4. Biomedical Engineering Center, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China

    Q. Y. Zhang & Y. J. Zeng

  5. Biomechanics and Medical Information Institute, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China

    Y. J. Zeng

Authors
  1. Y. D. Gu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. X. J. Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. S. Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. J. Lake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Q. Y. Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Y. J. Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. J. Zeng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gu, Y.D., Ren, X.J., Li, J.S. et al. Computer simulation of stress distribution in the metatarsals at different inversion landing angles using the finite element method. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 34, 669–676 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0856-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0856-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation