Table 4

participants’ opinion on environmental barriers to injury prevention related to women’s basketball in comparison with men’s basketball (n=number of participants (% of participants per question))

GenderMale (n=60)Female (n=45)
Agree or completely agreeNeutralDisagree or completely disagreeDon’t knowAgree or completely agreeNeutralDisagree or completely disagreeDon’t know
Female athletes have reduced infrastructures access (eg, basketball court, gym)13 (21.7)8 (13.3)25 (41.7)14 (23.3)26 (57.8)10 (22.2)7 (15.6)2 (4.4)
Female athletes have reduced physical preparation structure access (eg, gym)11 (18.3)11 (18.3)25 (41.7)13 (21.7)32 (71.1)5 (11.1)6 (13.3)2 (4.4)
Female athletes have reduced trainer access (eg, gym)9 (15.0)13 (21.7)25 (41.7)13 (21.7)29 (64.4)10 (22.2)4 (8.9)2 (4.4)
Female athletes have reduced medical resources access12 (20.0)7 (11.7)29 (48.3)12 (20.0)19 (42.2)10 (22.2)15 (33.3)1 (2.2)
Female athletes have team staff with less qualifications11 (18.3)10 (16.7)27 (45.0)12 (20.0)26 (57.8)9 (20.0)10 (22.2)0 (0.0)
Female athletes have reduced human resources access (eg, no of coaches, people in the medical team)18 (30.0)8 (13.3)22 (36.7)12 (20.0)40 (88.9)4 (8.9)1 (2.2)0 (0.0)
  • n, number of participants.