Table 3

Differences in PRE perceptions about the effects of running footwear on injuries and biomechanics between RUN and HCPs

RUN Mean (99% CI)
(n=1564)
HCPs
Mean (99% CI)
(n=878)
P value
In your opinion, how important is footwear for the prevention of running injuries?*7.6 (7.4 to 7.7)6.2 (6.0 to 6.5)<0.001§
Shoes with maximal cushioning help decrease ground impact and knee joint forces.†−0.2 (−0.6 to 0.3)−4.6 (−5.2 to −4.1)<0.001§
Shoes with minimal cushioning help decrease ground impact and knee joint forces.†0.2 (−0.2 to 0.6)2.5 (1.9 to 3.0)<0.001§
A softer shoe sole helps to prevent injuries.†−2.5 (−2.8 to −2.1)−4.9 (−5.4 to −4.5)<0.001§
A greater heel to toe drop (heel higher than the toes) helps to prevent injuries.†−3.2 (−3.5 to −2.8)−5.3 (−5.7 to −4.8)<0.001§
Changing to a different category of running shoes can lead to injury (example: going from maximalist to minimalist).†5.1 (4.8 to 5.4)5.9 (5.5 to 6.3)<0.001‡
Selecting shoes according to foot type (motion control shoes for low arches, stability shoes for normal arches, neutral shoes for high arches) helps to prevent injuries.†1.6 (1.2 to 2.1)−4.1 (−4.7 to −3.6)<0.001‡
  • *0 = Not important at all, 10 = Very important.

  • †−10 = Strongly disagree, 10 = Strongly agree.

  • ‡Parametric tests.

  • §Non-parametric tests.

  • HCPs, healthcare professionals; RUN, runners.