Table 5

To show whether studies favoured nKC or KC exercises for axioscapula muscle ratios

StudyUT:LT ratioUT:SA ratioUT:MT ratioLowest ratios
Yamauchi et al63KC 1.1 (0.8)
<nKC 1 (1.3)
KC 2.1 (1.4)<nKC 2 (3.1)KC 1.1 (2.4)<nKC 1 (3.6)UT/LT=KC 2.1 (0.2)
KC 2.1 (0.2)<nKC 2 (0.3)nKC 3 (0.5)<KC 3.1 (1.5)KC 3.1 (1.0)<nKC 3 (1.1)UT/SA=nKC 3 (0.5)
KC 5.1 (0.4)<nKC 5 (0.5)KC 4.1 (4.9)<nKC 4 (10.2)KC 5.1 (0.6)<nKC 5 (0.9)UT/MT=KC 2.1 (0.3)
KC 6.1 (0.4)<nKC 6 (0.7)KC 5.1 (9.3)<nKC 5 (18.7)KC 6.1 (1.0)<nKC 6 (1.5)
nKC 6 (2.5)<KC 6.1 (4.2)
Maenhout et al57N/AnKC 1 (0.52)<KC 2 (1) & KC 5 (1.56)N/AUT/LT=KC 2 (1.03)
UT/SA=KC 3 (0.4)
UT/MT=KC 5 (1.44)
KC versus nKC overallKCNDKCKC
  • Ratio of <1=muscle more active than UT.

  • Ratio of >1=UT more active.

  • KC, kinetic chain; LT, lower trapezius; MT, middle trapezius; N/A, not assessed; ND, no difference in overall KC and nKC exercises; nKC, non-kinetic chain; SA, serratus anterior; UT, upper trapezius.