Table 3

Baseline versus follow-up eccentric strength scores (in Nm/kg) (±1 SD) (95% CI) (p>0.01 for all data sets) and EHAD and EHAB strengths measured

Baseline EHADFollow-up EHADMean % changeBaseline EHABFollow-up EHABMean % changeBaseline EHAD:EHAB ratioFollow-up EHAD:EHAB ratioMean % change
Right leg3.46 (±0.49)
(3.21 to 3.71)
4.32 (±0.86) (3.88 to 4.76)25% increase3.08 (±0.55) (2.80 to 3.36)3.5 (±0.67) (3.16 to 3.84)13% increase1.12 (±0.51) (0.86 to 1.38)1.24 (±0.75) (0.85 to 1.63)10% increase
Left leg3.55 (±0.53) (3.28 to 3.82)4.4 (±0.64) (4.07 to 4.73)24% increase3.17 (±0.43) (2.95 to 3.39)3.5 (±0.64) (3.17 to 3.83)10% increase1.12 (±0.49) (0.87 to 1.37)1.26 (±0.65) (0.93 to 1.59)12% increase
  • EHAB, eccentric hip abduction; EHAD, eccentric hip adduction.