Table 3

Clinical characteristics of participants diagnosed with cardiovascular disease

DiagnosisSexAge, mean (range)Symptoms, n (%)High FRS, n (%)Abnormal EST, n (%)METs achieved on EST, mean (range)
Mild CAD26 M, 3 F60 (38–74)9 (31.0)9 (31.0)18 (62.1)14.6 (10.7–24.1)
Moderate CAD23 M, 1 F61 (39–74)7 (29.2)12 (50.0)14 (58.3)14.0 (10.0–19.0)
Significant CAD9 M, 1 F63 (50–76)1 (10.0)*5 (50.0)8 (80.0)13.4 (7.0–18.7)
BAV3 M46 (39–57)1 (33.3)1 (33.3)1 (33.3)16.7 (10.7–20.7)
MVP6 M, 5 F56 (42–68)4 (36.4)0 (0.0)4 (36.4)15.2 (10.9–18.6)
RHD1 F630 (0.0)0 (0.01 (100.0)14.1
Arrhythmia (AF, second-degree type II AV block)7 M64 (56–73)3 (42.9)3 (42.9)7 (100.0)14.1 (9.8–18.6)
PVC burden7 M59 (50–66)1 (14.3)1 (14.3)4 (57.2)14.6 (9.6–19.3)
Probable HCM†1 M, 1 F40, 600 (0.000 (0.0)0 (0.0)17.2 (15–19.3)
Coronary artery anomaly2 M61, 620 (0.0)1 (50.0)2 (100.0)12.2 (10.4–14)
Inheritable heart disease3 M, 1 F56 (40–62)0 (0.0)1 (25.0)2 (50.0)14.7 (10.4–19.3)
Dilated aorta14 M, 2 F61 (42–74)7 (43.4)4 (25.0)4 (25.0)15.0 (10.1–18.6)
  • 19 participants had multiple diagnoses; therefore, some participants are represented twice.

  • *Symptom reported was palpitations.

  • †Both patients declined further testing.

  • AF, atrial fibrillation; AV, atrioventricular; CAD, coronary artery disease; BAV, bicuspid aortic valve; EST, exercise stress test; F, female; FRS, Framingham Risk Score; HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; M, male; METs, metabolic equivalent task; MVP, mitral valve prolapse; RHD, rheumatic heart disease; PVC, premature ventricular contraction.