Table 2

Summary of synthesis of prognostic factors for all injury outcomes with associated GRADE evaluation

Adapted GRADE criteria
Injury typeSpecific OutcomesPotential prognostic factorsNumber of studiesAuthorsEffect measureUnivariate Effect size (95%  CI)Multivariate effect size (95%  CI)Study limitationsConsistency of resultsEffect sizePrecision of resultsPublication biasOverall quality
Muscle injuriesHamstring injuriesIncreasing age2Hagglund et al 36 37HRFigure 21.1 (1 to 1.2)ManyNoSmallImpreciseLikelyLow
Increasing age2Arnason et al,30 Henderson et al 39ORFigure 3ManyYesSmallPreciseLikelyLow
Previous hamstring injury2Hagglund et al 36 37HRFigure 2Figure 2ManyYesModerateImpreciseLikelyLow
Previous hamstring injury2Arnason et al,30 Fousekis et al 34OR7.42 (2.9 to 19)Figure 3Very manyNoVariableImpreciseLikelyVery low
Stature (above mean)1Hagglund et al 37HR0.82 (0.68 to 1.0)ManyN/ASmallImpreciseLikelyVery low
Previous quadriceps injury1Hagglund et al 37HR1.44 (1.08 to 1.93)Very manyN/ASmallImpreciseLikelyVery low
Eccentric hamstring strength asymmetries1Fousekis et al 34OR3.88 (1.13 to 13.23)Very manyN/AModerateImpreciseLikelyLow
BW adjusted eccentric hamstring strength (60  deg/s)1Van Dyk et al 42OR1.37 (1.01 to 1.85)ManyN/ASmallImpreciseLikelyVery low
BW adjusted concentric quadriceps strength (60  degree/s)1Van Dyk et al 42OR1.41 (1.03 to 1.92)ManyN/ASmallImpreciseLikelyVery low
Active hip flexion ROM (dominant leg)1Henderson et al 39OR0.77 (0.62 to 0.97)ManyN/ASmallImpreciseLikelyLow
Increased NCMJ height1Henderson et al 39OR1.47 (1.02 to 2.12)ManyN/ASmallImpreciseLikelyLow
Functional leg length asymmetry1Fousekis et al 34OR3.8 (1.08 to 13.33)Very manyN/ALargeImpreciseLikelyLow
Position: goalkeeper1Hagglund et al 37HR0.11 (0.06 to 0.23)0.11 (0.06 to 0.24)Very manyN/ALargeImpreciseLikelyVery low
Time of season:
September-November1Hagglund et al 37OR2.24 (1.34 to 3.74)2.16 (1.29 to 3.60)Very manyN/AModerateImpreciseLikelyVery low
December–February1Hagglund et al 37OR2.56 (1.54 to 4.26)2.55 (1.53 to 4.24)Very manyN/AModerateImpreciseLikelyVery low
March–May1Hagglund et al 37OR2.56 (1.54 to 4.28)2.49 (1.49 to 4.17)Very manyN/AModerateImpreciseLikelyVery low
Playing league matches with ≤4  days recovery1Bengtsson et al 31RR1.28 (1.06 to 1.56)ManyN/ASmallImpreciseLikelyVery low
Venue: away match1Hagglund et al 37OR0.75 (0.62 to 0.91)0.76 (0.63 to 0.92)Very manyN/ASmallImpreciseLikelyVery low
Quadriceps injuriesPrevious adductor injury1Hagglund et al 37HR1.88 (1.31 to 2.69)1.68 (1.16 to 2.41)Very manyN/ASmallImpreciseLikelyVery Low
Previous quadriceps injury1Hagglund et al 37HR3.47 (2.49 to 4.84)3.1 (2.21 to 4.36)Very manyN/ALargeImpreciseLikelyVery low
Previous calf injury1Hagglund et al 37HR2.08 (1.37 to 3.17)1.91 (1.24 to 2.93)Very manyN/AModerateImpreciseLikelyVery low
Position: goalkeeper1Hagglund et al 37HR0.46 (0.23 to 0.9)0.41 (0.2 to 0.82)Very manyN/AModerateImpreciseLikelyVery low
Playing league matches with ≤4  days recovery1Bengtsson et al 31RR1.8 (1.19 to 2.72)ManyN/ASmallImpreciseLikelyVery Low
Match type: UEFA CL1Hagglund et al 37OR0.51 (0.25 to 1.01)0.48 (0.24 to 0.97)Very manyN/AModerateImpreciseLikelyVery low
Adductor injuriesPrevious adductor injury1Hagglund et al 37HR1.48 (1.06 to 2.06)1.40 (1 to 1.96)Very manyN/ASmallImpreciseLikelyVery low
Position: goalkeeper1Hagglund et al 37HR0.58 (0.33 to 0.99)0.51 (0.29 to 0.91)Very manyN/AModerateImpreciseLikelyVery low
Venue: away match1Hagglund et al 37OR0.56 (0.43 to 0.73)0.56 (0.43 to 0.73)Very manyN/AModerateImpreciseLikelyVery low
Match type: other cup1Hagglund et al 37OR0.60 (0.37 to 0.97)Very manyN/AModerateImpreciseLikelyVery low
Groin strain injuriesPrevious groin strain1Arnason et al 30OR5.71 (2 to 15.9)7.3 (2.3 to 23.2)ManyN/ALargeImpreciseLikelyLow
Reduced ROM hip abduction1Arnason et al 30OR0.9 (0.8 to 1)ManyN/ASmallImpreciseLikelyVery Low
Calf muscle injuriesPrevious calf muscle injury1Hagglund et al 37HR2.83 (1.86 to 4.31)2.33 (1.52 to 3.57)Very manyN/AModerateImpreciseLikelyVery low
Increasing age1Hagglund et al 37HR2.02 (1.45 to 2.82)1.93 (1.38 to 2.71)Very manyN/AModerateImpreciseLikelyVery low
Previous adductor injury1Hagglund et al 37HR1.87 (1.26 to 2.77)1.71 (1.15 to 2.55)Very manyN/ASmallImpreciseLikelyVery low
Previous hamstring injury1Hagglund et al 37HR2.1 (1.51 to 2.54)1.74 (1.24 to 2.44)Very manyN/ASmallImpreciseLikelyVery low
Match type: UEFA CL1Hagglund et al 37OR2.43 (1.61 to 3.67)2.72 (1.78 to 4.14)Very manyN/AModerateImpreciseLikelyVery low
Position: goalkeeper1Hagglund et al 37HR0.43 (0.2 to 0.96)0.36 (0.16 to 0.82)Very manyN/AModerateImpreciseLikelyVery low
Ligament injuriesAnkle sprainPrevious ankle sprain*2Arnason et al, 30 Faude et al 33ORFigure 4Figure 4ManyNoLargeImpreciseLikelyVery low
Weight above median1Fousekis et al 35OR5.72 (1.37 to 23.95)ManyN/ALargeImpreciseLikelyVery low
BMI > median1Fousekis et al 35OR8.16 (1.42 to 46.63)ManyN/ALargeImpreciseLikelyVery low
Eccentric ankle strength asymmetry >15%1Fousekis et al 35OR8.88 (1.95 to 40.36)ManyN/ALargeImpreciseLikelyVery low
Playing three matches within4  days1Carling et al 32IRR10.4 (1.9 to 57.9)ManyN/ALargeImpreciseLikelyVery low
Knee sprainPrevious knee sprain*2Arnason et al 30 Faude et al 33ORFigure 4Figure 4ManyNoModerateImpreciseLikelyVery low
ACL tearPrevious ACL tear†1Faude et al 33OR5.24 (1.42 to 19.59)ManyN/ALargeImpreciseLikelyVery low
TendinopathyPatellar tendinopathyAge1Hagglund et al 38OR0.97 (0.93 to 1.01)Very manyN/ASmallImpreciseLikelyVery low
Increased body weight (per 5  kg)1Hagglund et al 38OR1.15 (1 to 1.33)Very manyN/ASmallImpreciseLikelyVery low
Total football exposure hours (per 10  hours increase)1Hagglund et al 38ORNo data1.02 (1 to 1.04)Very manyN/ASmallImpreciseLikelyVery low
Injuries defined by anatomical locationTraumatic knee injuriesPrevious ACL injury‡1Waldén et al 41Rel. R2.6 (1.1 to 6.7)Very manyN/AModerateImpreciseLikelyVery low
Previous ACL injury§1Waldén et al 41Rel. R2.7 (1.3 to 5.8)Very manyN/AModerateImpreciseLikelyVery low
Previous knee injury1Hagglund et al 36HR3.10 (1.3 to 7.6)Very manyN/AModerateImpreciseLikelyVery low
Overuse knee injuriesPrevious ACL injury ‡1Waldén et al 41Rel. R7.9 (3.4 to 18.5)Very manyN/ALargeImpreciseLikelyVery low
Previous ACL injury§1Waldén et al 41Rel. R4.8 (2.0 to 11.2)Very manyN/ALargeImpreciseLikelyVery low
Thigh injuriesIncreased BMI1Nilstad et al 40OR1.37 (0.95 to 1.98)1.51 (1.08 to 2.11)FewN/ASmallImpreciseLikelyVery low
Knee injuriesPrevious ACL injury ‡1Waldén et al 41Rel. R4.5 (2.3 to 8.8)Very manyN/ALargeImpreciseLikelyVery low
Previous ACL injury§1Waldén et al 41Rel. R3.4 (1.8 to 6.3)Very manyN/AModerateImpreciseLikelyVery low
Ankle injuriesAge1Nilstad et al 40OR0.64 (0.44 to 0.95)0.65 (0.4 to 1.05)FewN/ASmallImpreciseLikelyVery low
Increased 1 RM leg press1Nilstad et al 40OR1.47 (1.05 to 2.05)1.41 (0.97 to 2.06)FewN/ASmallImpreciseLikelyVery low
Foot pronation1Nilstad et al 40OR1.56 (1.13 to 2.15)1.55 (0.99 to 2.41)FewN/ASmallImpreciseLikelyVery low
Reduced knee valgus angle1Nilstad et al 40OR1.14 (0.49 to 2.66)0.64 (0.41 to 1)FewN/AModerateImpreciseLikelyVery low
Lower leg/foot injuriesPrevious knee injury1Nilstad et al 40OR3.73 (1.47 to 9.46)3.57 (1.27 to 9.99)FewN/ALargeImpreciseLikelyLow
Increased BMI1Nilstad et al 40OR1.44 (0.84 to 2.49)1.4 (0.90 to 2.17)FewN/ASmallImpreciseLikelyVery low
Increased age1Nilstad et al 40OR1.48 (1 to 2.21)1.47 (0.98 to 2.2)FewN/ASmallImpreciseLikelyVery low
Groin injuriesPrevious groin injury1Hagglund et al 36HR2.40 (1.2 to 4.6)Very manyN/ASmallImpreciseLikelyVery low
  • RR, rate  ratio; Rel. R, relative  risk; IRR , incidence  rate ratio; BMI, body  mass index; ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; BW, body  weight; N/A, not available; GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; NCMJ, non-countermovement jump; RM, repetition  maximum; UEFA CL, UEFA Champions League match;

  • Effect size and CIs in bold indicate significant value. Effect sizes and CIs in normal font indicate non-significant result. Effect sizes classed as small if measures between 0.66–1 and 1 – 2.4, moderate 0.33–0.66 and 2.5 – 4.4, large 0–0.33  and ≥4.5.

  • *Arnason et al 30 investigated male subjects, whereas Faude et al 33 investigated female subjects—see figure 4 for details.

  • † Faude et al 33 have investigated female participants only.

  • ‡Denotes where knee used as unit of analysis,

  • § Denotes where player used as unit of analysis.