Table 2

Respondents’ awareness, use and perceptions of the FIFA 11+ programme, including the HBM constructs53 and RE-AIM framework dimensions52 which each question related to

Question or statementHBM constructRE-AIM*
dimension(s)
nYes % (95% CI)†No % (95% CI)†Unsure
% (95% CI)†
Agree % (95% CI)†Neither agree nor disagree
% (95% CI)†
Disagree
% (95% CI)†
Had you heard of the FIFA 11+ before taking part in this questionnaire?Cues to actionR1861 (54 to 68)39 (32 to 46)0
Does your team currently use the FIFA 11+?Perceived benefitR, A, M1828‡ (22 to 36)61 (54 to 68)11 (6 to 16)
Have you ever been in a team which used the FIFA 11+?Perceived benefitR, A13§69 (54 to 84)31 (16 to 46)
Does the FIFA 11+ need to be improved for use in your team?Perceived benefitA, I, M1778 (70 to 86)6 (2 to 10)17 (10 to 24)
Should your club develop its own version of the FIFA 11+?Cues to actionA, I, M1710000
The FIFA can prevent LL injuries in your teamPerceived benefitE, A1883 (77 to 89)17 (11 to 23)0
The FIFA 11+ is soccer specificPerceived benefitA, I, M1850 (43 to 57)44 (37 to 51)6 (2 to 10)
The FIFA 11+ is too longPerceived barrierA, I, M176 (2 to 10)35 (26 to 44)59 (50 to 68)
The FIFA 11+ contains adequate variation and progression for our teamPerceived benefitA, I, M1722 (14 to 30)28 (20 to 36)50 (41 to 59)
The FIFA 11+ could be maintained over multiple seasons by our teamCues to actionA, I, M1844 (37 to 51)17 (11 to 23)39 (32 to 46)
  • *The Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework: R=reach, E=effectiveness, A=adoption, I=implementation, M=maintenance.

  • †In cases of 0% agreement, 95% CIs calculations returning (0–0) are left blank.

  • ‡Sum of ‘yes’ (6%) and ‘yes, but modified’ (22%).

  • §Skip-logic was employed for the five respondents already using the FIFA 11+.

  • HBM, Health Belief Model; LL, lower limb; RE-AIM, Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance.