Table 1

Outcome measurements of the NURSE-RCT and other data for methods development

DomainMeasurement
Primary outcome
Body structure and functions
 Low back painPain intensity: visual analogue scale 0–100 mm during the past month*
Secondary outcomes
 Musculoskeletal pain
  • Pain intensity: Numeric Rating Scale 0–10 during the past 4 weeks; assessed for low back, upper back, neck, shoulder, knee, hip

  • Pain frequency of each above site: daily, most days but not daily, now and then*

 Musculoskeletal exertion†
  • Perceived exertion after typical working day: Numeric Rating Scale

  • 1–5; assessed for low back, upper back, neck, shoulder, knee, hip*

 Sleep and recovery from work†Tiredness in the morning, tiredness during the day, sleepiness during the day, recovery after work: Numeric Rating Scale 1–5*
 Mental well-beingBeck Depression Inventory (9 items)*‡
Activity limitations
 Movement control dysfunctionMCI test battery*
 Motor skill: static balance§One-leg stand
 Motor skill: gross movement timing§Rhythm coordination test*
 Range of motion: trunk§Trunk side-bending*
 Range of motion: upper-body§Shoulder neck mobility*
 Muscular fitness: trunk§Dynamic sit-ups
 Body compositionWeight, height, body mass index
 Motor skill: agility§Running figure of 8 functional fitness test*
 Muscular fitness: upper-body and trunk§Modified push-ups; functional fitness test*
 Muscular fitness: leg power§Vertical jump; functional fitness test*
 Muscular fitness: leg strength§One-leg squat (forward); functional fitness test*
 Aerobic fitness: walking6 min walk test; functional fitness test
 Limitations in self-reported activitiesPatient specific functional scale
Participation
 Physical activity and sedentary behaviourObjective assessment with accelerometer for 7 days (Hookie AM20 tri-axial accelerometer, Traxmeet, Espoo, Finland)
 Physical activity and exercise diaryRecorded for the 7 days when using the accelerometer
 Physical activity recommendation¶Standard Finnish Questionnaire assessing the fulfilment of current recommendation for weekly physical activity
 Health-related quality of lifeRand 36-item health survey questionnaire
 Self-reported work ability†WAI: four standard questions
Environmental factors
 Psychosocial factors at work†Selected items of a Finnish questionnaire*
Individual factors
 Fear avoidance**Fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire*
Methods development
Body structure and functioning
 Functioning of the autonomic nervous system (substudies 1 and 2)Measurements of heart-rate variability during two working days and one leisure day
Activity limitations
 Physical functioning in nursing tasksAbility to manage with heavy, task specific nursing duties including patient transfer: Numeric Rating Scale 0–10 with 21 selection points*‡
 Motion analysis (substudy 3)IMU system (Valedo Research, Hocoma AG, Volketswil, Switzerland)††
  • *Assessment of test-retest repeatability.

  • †Standard questionnaire developed by the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Finland.

  • ‡Assessment of construct validity.

  • §Standard method developed by the UKK Institute, Tampere, Finland.

  • ¶Standard method developed by the UKK Institute and National Institute of Health and Well-being, Finland.

  • **Finnish version, translated and validated by Orton, Helsinki, Finland.

  • ††Assessment of validity of IMU to detect MCIs and their changes.

  • IMU, inertial measurement unit; MCI, movement control impairment; NURSE-RCT, prevention of chronic low back pain in female nurses; WAI, Work Ability Index.