@article {Pihle000511, author = {Elsa Pihl and Olof Skoldenberg and Hans Nasell and Sven Jonhagen and Paula Kelly Pettersson and Carl Johan Hedbeck}, title = {Patient-reported outcomes after surgical and non-surgical treatment of proximal hamstring avulsions in middle-aged patients}, volume = {5}, number = {1}, elocation-id = {e000511}, year = {2019}, doi = {10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000511}, publisher = {BMJ Specialist Journals}, abstract = {Objectives In the literature on proximal hamstring avulsions, only two studies report the outcomes of non-surgically treated patients. Our objective was to compare subjective recovery after surgical and non-surgical treatment of proximal hamstring avulsions in a middle-aged cohort.Methods We included 47 patients (33 surgically and 14 non-surgically treated) with a mean (SD) age of 51 ({\textpm}9) years in a retrospective cohort study. Follow-up time mean (SD) of 3.9 ({\textpm}1.4) years. The outcome variables were the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and questions from the Proximal Hamstring Injury Questionnaire. Outcome variables were adjusted in regression models for gender, age, American Society of Anestesiologits (ASA) classification and MRI findings at diagnosis.Results The baseline characteristics showed no differences except for the MRI result, in which the surgically treated group had a larger proportion of tendons retracted >= 2 cm. The mean LEFS score was 74 (SD{\textpm}12) in the surgically treated cohort and 72 (SD{\textpm}16) in the non-surgically treated cohort. This was also true after adjusting for confounders. The only difference in outcome at follow-up was the total hours performing physical activity per week, p=0.02; surgically treated patients reported 2.5 hours or more (5.2 vs 2.7).Conclusion This study on middle-aged patients with proximal hamstring avulsions was unable to identify any difference in patient-reported outcome measures between surgically and non-surgically treated patients. The vast majority of patients treated surgically had complete proximal hamstring avulsions with >= 2 cm of retraction. We conclude that to obtain an evidence-based treatment algorithm for proximal hamstring avulsions studies of higher scientific level are needed.}, URL = {https://bmjopensem.bmj.com/content/5/1/e000511}, eprint = {https://bmjopensem.bmj.com/content/5/1/e000511.full.pdf}, journal = {BMJ Open Sport \& Exercise Medicine} }