Article Text

Download PDFPDF

63 Successful isolation of viable stem cells from cryopreserved microfragmented human abdominal adipose tissue from patients with knee osteoarthritis
  1. Jasmin Bagge1,
  2. Per Hölmich1,
  3. Freja Hammer1,
  4. Jan Nehlin2,
  5. Lars Blønd3,
  6. Lisbet Hölmich4,
  7. Kristoffer Barfod1
  1. 1Sports Orthopedic Research Center – Copenhagen (SORC-C), Copenhagen University Hospital – Hvidovre, Kettegård Allé 30, Danmark
  2. 2Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital – Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Danmark
  3. 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zealand University Hospital – Køge, Lykkebækvej 1, Denmark
  4. 4Department of Plastic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital – Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, Denmark


Introduction Treatment of knee osteoarthritis with stem cells from microfragmented adipose tissue (AT) has shown promising results. Cryopreservation and biobanking of stem cells are important for research, treatment of aged patients, and for repetitive treatments. Our aim was, therefore, to investigate if viable stem cells could be isolated and expanded from cryopreserved microfragmented AT by two different isolation methods.

Materials and Methods Microfragmented abdominal AT from knee osteoarthritis patients was cryopreserved at -80°C in cryoprotectant-medium containing 10% dimethyl sulfoxide. The samples were thawed for stem cell isolation by tissue explant culture (TEC) and enzymatic digestion (ED), respectively. Viability, population doublings, and doubling time were assessed by trypan blue staining. Cell type was investigated using flow cytometry. Osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation was assessed quantitatively by Alizarin-Red-S and Oil-Red-O staining, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-tests. p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results Microfragmented AT from 7 patients was cryopreserved for a period of 46–150 days (mean (SD) 115.9 days (44.3 days)). Viable stem cells were successfully recovered and expanded from all patients using both isolation methods with no significant difference in viable population doublings or doubling time from passage 1 to 3 (p>0.05). Stemness was verified by surface markers and osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation. More pericytes were present when using TEC (25% (24%)) compared to ED (2% (2%)) at passage 4 (p=0.04).

Conclusion Viable stem cells can be isolated and expanded from cryopreserved microfragmented AT using both TEC and ED. TEC provides more clinically relevant pericytes than ED.

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.