Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Dissemination and implementation research in sports and exercise medicine and sports physical therapy: translating evidence to practice and policy
  1. Oluwatoyosi B A Owoeye1,
  2. Rachel S Rauvola2,
  3. Ross C Brownson3
  1. 1 Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, Doisy College of Health Sciences, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
  2. 2 Department of Psychology, College of Science and Health, DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  3. 3 Prevention Research Center, Brown School; Department of Surgery (Division of Public Health Sciences) and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
  1. Correspondence to Oluwatoyosi B A Owoeye; olu.owoeye{at}health.slu.edu

Abstract

Knowledge from research evidence is wasted unless it is applied. While the scientific evidence base for many sports and exercise medicine and sports physical therapy interventions is robust, real-world implementation and evolution to scale remains an ongoing challenge. Dissemination and implementation research is important to generate evidence-informed, cost-effective and context-specific strategies for implementation partners and stakeholders to effectively apply and sustain the best research evidence in public health and clinical practice. However, this field of inquiry remains underexplored in sports and exercise medicine and sports physical therapy. Most intervention studies in sports and exercise medicine and sports physical therapy are terminated at the efficacy trial stage without considerations for best practices for translation to community and clinical settings. Lack of context-specific dissemination and implementation strategies to drive the translation of evidence-based interventions results in poor execution of, and attrition from, interventions, and this is associated with suboptimal outcomes and increased healthcare costs. Theory-driven quality research informing the successful dissemination and implementation of evidence-based interventions is needed to address lingering evidence-to-practice gaps. Dissemination and implementation research completes the final stage in the research-to-practice pipeline. It seeks to close evidence-to-practice gaps, thereby ensuring speedy application of research evidence to achieve desired public health outcomes while making more efficient use of limited resources. This review introduces sports and exercise medicine and sports physical therapy researchers and stakeholders to key concepts and principles in dissemination and implementation research.

  • Knowledge translation
  • Intervention effectiveness
  • Implementation
  • Behaviour
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Twitter Oluwatoyosi Owoeye @owoeye_oba.

  • Acknowledgements This review was completed during the COVID-19 pandemic lock-down and work-from-home period. The lead author wishes to acknowledge the support received from his wife, Adeola Owoeye and kids, Dami and Demi Owoeye through the completion of this work.

  • Contributors OBAO conceived and designed the study, wrote the first draft of the manuscript and conducted the literature review for study content. RSR and RCB contributed to the design, and provided additional literature relevant to study. All authors contributed to the critical revision of manuscript drafts and approved the final version.

  • Funding This research work was funded by the Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.