Objectives The 20 m shuttle run test (20mSRT) is used to estimate cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) through the prediction of peak oxygen uptake ( ), but its validity as a measure of CRF during childhood and adolescence is questionable. This study examined the validity of the 20mSRT to predict peak .
Methods Peak was measured during treadmill running. Log-linear regression was used to correct peak for body mass and sum of skinfolds plus age. Boys completed the 20mSRT under standardised conditions. Maximum speed (km/h) was used with age to predict peak using the equation developed by Léger et al. Validity was examined from linear regression methods and limits of agreement (LoA). Relationships between 20mSRT performance and allometrically adjusted peak , and predicted per cent fat were examined.
Results The sample comprised 76 boys aged 11–14 years. Predicted and measured mass-related peak (mL/kg/min) shared common variance of 32%. LoA revealed that measured peak ranged from 15% below to 25% above predicted peak . There were no significant relationships (p>0.05) between predicted peak and measured peak adjusted for mass, age and skinfold thicknesses. Adjusted for body mass and age, peak was not significantly related (p>0.05) to 20mSRT final speed but a weak, statistically significant (r=0.24, p<0.05) relationship was found with peak adjusted for mass and fatness. Predicted per cent fat was negatively correlated with 20mSRT speed (r=−0.61, p<0.001).
Conclusions The 20mSRT reflects fatness rather than CRF and has poor validity grounded in its flawed estimation and interpretation of peak in mL/kg/min.
- exercise testing
- fitness testing
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Twitter @Jo Welsman
Contributors JW and NA jointly conceived and designed the research, led the research team and analysed the data. Both authors contributed to the drafting of the manuscript, both authors reviewed and approved the final version.
Funding This study was funded by Northcott Devon Medical Foundation and the Darlington Trust.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient and public involvement statement Patient involvement in this study was not appropriate.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Ethics approval Ethical approval for this study was received from the Exeter and District Health Authority Ethics Committee.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data availability statement Data are available on reasonable request. Contact: email@example.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.