Article Text

PDF

Assessing the risk for major injuries in equestrian sports
  1. Lara Krüger1,
  2. Maike Hohberg2,
  3. Wolfgang Lehmann1,
  4. Klaus Dresing1
  1. 1 Department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Plastic Surgery, University Medical Centre Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
  2. 2 Chair of Statistics, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
  1. Correspondence to Dr Lara Krüger; lara.krueger{at}med.uni-goettingen.de

Abstract

Background/aim Horse riding is a popular sport, which bears the risk of serious injuries. This study aims to assess whether individual factors influence the risk to sustain major injuries.

Methods Retrospective data were collected from all equine-related accidents at a German Level I Trauma Centre between 2004 and 2014. Logistic regression was used to identify the risk factors for major injures.

Results 770 patients were included (87.9% females). Falling off the horse (67.7%) and being kicked by the horse (16.5%) were the two main injury mechanisms. Men and individuals of higher age showed higher odds for all tested parameters of serious injury. Patients falling off a horse had higher odds for being treated as inpatients, whereas patients who were kicked had higher odds for a surgical therapy (OR 1.7) and intensive care unit/intermediate care unit (ICU/IMC) treatment (OR 1.2). The head was the body region most often injured (32.6%) and operated (32.9%). Patients with head injuries had the highest odds for being hospitalised (OR 6.13). Head or trunk injuries lead to the highest odds for an ICU/IMC treatment (head: OR 4.37; trunk: OR 2.47). Upper and lower limb injuries showed the highest odds for a surgical therapy (upper limb: OR 2.61; lower limb: OR 1.7).

Conclusion Risk prevention programmes should include older individuals and males as target groups. Thus a rethinking of the overall risk assessment is necessary. Not only horseback riding itself, but also handling a horse bears a relevant risk for major injuries. Serious head injures remain frequent, serious and an important issue to be handled in equestrians sports.

  • equestrian
  • injury
  • equine-related
  • trauma
  • prevention

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

What are the new findings?

  • In equestrian sport, men are at risk for major injuries, with rising age the risk for major injuries rises.

  • Despite all prevention measures, head injuries remain the most frequent and serious.

How might it impact on clinical practice?

  • A rethinking is necessary: risk prevention programmes should include older individuals and males as target groups.

  • Helmet use is urgently recommended; a mandatory helmet use should be considered.

Introduction

Horseback riding is one of the most popular recreational activities in Europe,1 and equine-related accidents increased in the past years.2–4 The power of a horse can expose the rider to a potential high-energy trauma.5 However, the overall incidence of injuries compared with other sports is described as rather low.6–8 In fact the risk of major injuries is of high relevance, hence some authors postulate equestrian sports to be more dangerous than American football, skiing or motor sports.5 9 10

The demographics of equine-related accidents were studied a multiple times.4 11–15 In contrast to other high-risk sports, frequently young females pursue this sport and comprise a major share in equestrian accidents.4 11–15 Males tend to practice equestrian sports at a higher age. Injured male patients were described significantly older than females.11 13 15

Studies evaluating risk factors for serious injuries are scarce, and there is no current consensus regarding individual risk profiles. Individual factors like gender, age and accident mechanism might influence the injury pattern and therapy course.

In order to contribute to the understanding of this popular high-risk sport, this study aims to (1) analyse demographics, accident mechanisms, injury patterns, therapy and severity of equine-related accidents, and (2) assess whether individual factors such as age, gender and injury mechanisms influence the risk to suffer a severe injury. If possible groups of risk for major injuries should be defined.

Methods

Data collection

This is a retrospective cohort study. Digital case histories of all patients registered in the emergency department of the department of Trauma Surgery, Orthopaedics and Plastic Surgery at the University Medical Centre Goettingen between 1 January 2004 and 1 April 2014 were computer-based scanned for keywords (‘horse’, ‘pony’, ‘riding’).

Individuals of all age groups involved in an accident while riding or handling a horse, with all kinds of injury, ranging from ‘no injury’ to ‘fatal’ were included. Logically not matching patients (eg, ‘bike riding’), as well as double entries were excluded.

Patient database

For 770 individuals, data were collected on accident date and patient demographics (gender and age). Accident mechanisms were categorised in the groups ‘fall from horse’, ‘kicked by horse’ and ‘other’. We focused on 648 individuals that fell off the horse or that were kicked by the horse since own and previous results identified these two as the main injury mechanisms.11 15 16 The group of other mechanisms was too inhomogeneous to produce reliable results for them. To classify the body region, injuries were summed up into the following International Classification of Diseases, tenth revision system-based categories: ‘head, face and throat’, ‘trunk’, ‘spine’, ‘upper limb’ and ‘lower limb’.

Injury severity

As applied before4 9 15 17 clinical parameters were used to evaluate the injury severity. These were an inpatient treatment, surgical therapy, being admitted to the intensive care unit/intermediate care unit (ICU/IMC) and the length of hospital stay in days (LOS).

Statistical analysis

After presenting descriptive statistics, several regression models were performed to study the effect of gender, age, accident mechanism and injury pattern on the injury severity.

All therapy course variables, except of LOS, were binary. For these binary variables, logistic regression was applied while for LOS a model employing the Poisson distribution was fit. As age affects the therapy variables in a non-linear way p(enalized) splines18 were used to model the effect of age. Thus, generalised additive models were fitted. Note that in contrast to previous studies12 15 age was not split into categories as there were different proportions of male and female in these categories leading to a bias in the male variable. Additionally, given the small amount of males in the dataset, building categories yielded to having very little observations in each level, that is, being male and being in a certain age group.

All models were estimated using the R statistical programming language.19

Results

Characteristics of study collective

Between 2004 and 2014, 770 individuals were presented to the University Medical Centre with injuries resulting from equestrian sports. In total, 648 (84.2%) of those patients fell off the horse or were kicked by the horse. Table 1 presents the demographics of both patient collectives and the literature reference as shown in table 2.

Table 1

Patient characteristics of all 770 individuals and the subgroup of 648 individuals that fell off the horse or were kicked by the horse

Table 2

Literature for reference, recent retrospective studies with same inclusion criteria and n>100

The larger part of all patients was female (87.9%), they were on average about 10 years younger than males. Injuries to the head, face or throat were the leading accident consequence, but also injuries to all other body regions were commonly observed and made up a share of almost one-fifth (18.3%) to one-fourth (24.4%) of injured patients.

The spinal injuries were prevalently distorsions, commonly at the cervical spine and fractures, mainly at the thoracolumbar junction. There was only one patient with a spinal chord injury and two patients with lesions of the brachial or lumbosacral plexus.

Therapy course

Table 3 shows the descriptive statistics for the therapy course of the 648 individuals that fell off the horse or were kicked by the horse since the risk analyses were based on this subgroup.

Table 3

Therapy course of 648 patients that fell off the horse or were kicked by the horse

Table 4

Details of the 196 surgical procedures that were performed for 143 patients, subdivided in primary and follow-up surgery

More than half of the patients (51.5%) were treated as inpatients after being presented to the emergency room. The mean LOS was 6.5 days with 22.1% of all patients undergoing surgery and 8.6% being treated on an ICU or IMC unit.

Males were over-represented in each therapy category. While there were 12.2% males overall, they made up a share of 14.7%, 18.9% and 25% of inpatients, patients that underwent surgery and received ICU or IMC treatment, respectively. Men also spent on average more days in the hospital than females (9.4 vs 6.1).

The mean age, which was 25.4 years for all patients, was higher in each therapy category.

Patients that were kicked by the horse made up a bigger share in all therapy categories (16.5% in all patients vs 18%, 25.9% and 21.4% in the therapy groups) and had a longer mean LOS than patients that fell off the horse (9.6 days vs 5.9 days).

Surgical therapy

For 143 patients with surgical therapy, 196 procedures were performed (see table 4).

The body regions on which the primary procedures were performed are listed in table 5.

Table 5

Primary surgical procedures divided into body regions

Figure 2

Detailed illustration of the body regions on which the primary surgical procedures were performed.

Evaluation of risk factors by using regression analysis

Judging from the descriptive, it might be that males, older people and individuals getting kicked by the horse got more severely injured than females, younger people and individuals that fall off the horse. To disentangle these effects, regression analyses were performed (see table 6). The effect of gender, age, accidents mechanism and injured body region on the therapy course was measured. Analyses for the LOS were performed for inpatients (n=334).

Table 6

Regression analyses, influence of gender, age, accident mechanism and injured body region on the therapy course

Influence of gender

Males had 1.4 times higher odds of being hospitalised than females and stayed on average exp(0.2)=1.2 times longer in the hospital after being admitted. The odds for undergoing surgery and for being admitted to the ICU or IMC were also higher for males than for females. However, only the effect for LOS was statistically significant and the group of males admitted to ICU or IMC was with 14 observations (see table 3) quite small.

Influence of age

The age-depending effect for all therapy variables is illustrated in figure 1.

Figure 1

Effect of age on (A) inpatient treatment, (B) length of stay in days (LOS), (c) surgery, (d) intensive care unit (ICU) or intermediate care unit (IMC) treatment. Dashed lines indicate confidence intervals.

The U-shaped graphs in (A) and (C) with a turning point close to 20 years show that up to this age the odds of an inpatient treatment and surgery decreased while it increased after that. Wide CIs for very young and old individuals indicate less observations in these areas. For LOS (B), age increases steadily between the age of 5 and 55 years. Out of this bounds, the estimates vary and become more uncertain. The risk of being treated at the ICU or IMC ward (D) increased with age in a linear way. All age effects were statistically significant on a 1% level.

Influence of the accident mechanism

Regarding the accident mechanism the results of risk analyses were ambiguous. Patients that were kicked by the horse had lower odds for being hospitalised than patients that fell off the horse. At the same time they had a 1.7 times higher odds for undergoing surgery, stayed exp(0.52)=1.7 times longer in the hospital when hospitalised. They also had higher odds for being treated in intensive or intermediate care though this coefficient was not statistical significant.

Influence of the injured body region

Focusing on the body region, head injuries increase the odds of being hospitalised the most compared with other body regions. Injuries to the head and to the trunk lead to significant higher odds for a treatment on the ICU or IMC compared with individuals with other injuries. The highest odds for an operation are statistically significantly linked to injuries to the upper and lower limb.

Discussion

Prevention measures are efficient, when they are addressed to defined target groups.20 The purpose of this study was to define groups of risk for serious injuries in equestrian sports. Like this we aimed to contribute to the understanding of a popular high-risk sport. To our knowledge, this study provides the biggest single-centre dataset in Europe. The effect of individual influence factors on the injury severity was disentangled by using regression analyses. Like in other studies with a large dataset4 9 15 17 the injury severity was evaluated using pragmatic criteria of the therapy course (inpatient stay, LOS, operations, ICU/IMC treatment).

Since the University Medical Centre is the only Level I Trauma Centre within a 70 km range, we assume that the majority of severe accidents in our area was included in the patients collective.

With 770 patients in a 10-year period, equine-related injuries are an important issue to be managed in the emergency department. As illustrated, the characteristics of the described patient collective correspond in all points with the current literature.4 11–13

Male gender as a risk for serious injuries

Females made up a large share of the patients. However, males were identified as a group of risk prone to serious injuries. They had higher odds for serious outcomes in all tested parameters. We thus confirm recent observations of authors1 12 14 who observed same tendencies in their datasets. This shows a contrast to other studies, which did not emphasise any effect of gender.11 17 Weber21 described women to be in general more risk-averse than men. However, reasons are speculative. Note the limitation that in the group of men not all effects reached statistical significance.

Young children should be assessed with care, individuals of higher age are at risk for serious injury

Patients were not attributed into age groups, thus we were able to analyse the age-depending risk course in detail. The very young patients showed higher odds for being hospitalised and undergoing surgery, but these findings need to be interpreted with caution. The CIs were wide due to few observations. The literature concerning age-related risk for serious injury is scarce. Only one study3 observed a higher ISS (7.0 versus 5.5, p=0.0002) and hospitalisation rate for patients of younger age. Yet other authors report a notable high incidence of head injuries, in particular concussions, for children.6 12 These are followed by the need for hospitalisation and patient monitoring. It remains unclear whether young children are preventively treated with more caution or whether they suffer more serious injuries. However, we share the conclusion of Laurent et al 3 that the very young horseback riders need to be supervised with special care.

With increasing age patients had higher odds for all parameters of serious outcomes. We thus defined them as a group of higher risk and support the findings of previous studies.12 20 22 Schicho et al 20 suspected a multifactorial genesis: with increasing age the reaction speed, flexibility of ligaments and bone density are decreasing, resulting in more severe injuries at comparable trauma. Bilaniuk et al 12 suspected a less careful behaviour. However, we recommend to include individuals of a higher age in future research campaigns.

Horse riding itself as well as handling a horse hase the potential for serious injury, also bystanders should be alert

While comparing the accident mechanisms, no clear rating of risk was possible. This is in line with the literature: Carmichael16 compared mounted to unmounted equestrians and found both to be in the same danger of serious injury. Lang23 identified a higher ISS for the group of riders, but a significantly higher rate of surgeries in the group of non-riders. Schröter22 postulated that 34.5% of horse-kick related injuries are potentially life threatening. It is important to state that not only horse riding, but also handling the horse bears a comparable risk for serious injuries. Also bystanders watching sports with no attention in working with horses can suffer major to lethal injuries, for example, by being kicked.

As proposed before16 wearing a helmet should be a standard during all activities with the horse. Bystanders should be risk alert and should be advised to keep an adequate distance to the horse.

Head injuries remain frequent, serious and an ongoing issue to handle

It was illustrated before that the injury pattern resulting from equestrian sports is various. Injuries of all parts of the body play an important role.

In this study, patients with injuries to the head comprised the biggest share. At the same time they were associated with the highest risk for hospitalisation and an intensive or intermediate care treatment. It is remarkable that the head was the body region with the most frequent surgical procedures performed. Osteosynthesis to the orbit and midface played an important role, but also craniotomy and cranial trepanation had to be performed to six patients. A recent study found equine-related accidents to be the most important contributor to sports-related traumatic brain injuries in the USA (45.2%).24 The protective effect of riding helmet was shown multiple times before.9 11 12 25–27 Bilaniuk et al found a significant lower ISS and incidence of intracranial injury in patients wearing a helmet.12 A latest review by Zuckerman and colleges showed an absolute risk reduction of 40%–50% for head injuries.28 Despite the evidence that helmets are of strong protective use, we still see a big number of severe head injuries. Like Zuckerman et al we thus recommend a mandatory helmet use, not only while riding a horse but for all activities around it.

Reviewing the literature on major equestrian injuries studies also hints at the serious potential of trunk injuries.17 29 We confirmed this with the present study. The protective use of riding vests could not be proven so far30 and remains an important issue of future prevention research.

Almost one-fifth of the patients suffered spinal injuries, which is confirmed by the literature.12 22 Those patients had higher odds for being hospitalised and treated on an ICU or IMC, though effects were not significant. Three patients had lesions of the spinal chord or plexus, but the present study did not evaluate the long-term outcome after an accident. Papachristos et al 17 reported significantly more ongoing pain and a prolonged recovery time of patients with spine injuries resulting from equestrian incidents.

Most of the open reduction internal fixations (ORIFs) or closed reduction internal fixations (CRIFs) were performed at the limbs. Thus patients with injuries to the upper or lower limbs had the highest odds for undergoing surgery. Since fractures of the long bones are commonly addressed by osteosynthesis, this is sensible from a clinical point of view.

Limitations

Due to retrospective design only yet existing information could be evaluated and incomplete documentation remains a reason for loss of data. The amount of observations for males was low in some categories leading to little reliable statements.

Relying on observational data, the analysis might suffer from selection bias. For example, it is possible that severe injuries are over-represented in one group, for example, adult male, as they are less likely to go to the hospital with mild injuries compared with other groups. In addition, some groups could have preferences for hospitals in the surroundings. If these preferences are non-randomly distributed, results are biased. However, even advanced sample selection methods are of little use here since we do not have data on persons that get injured but decide to not see a doctor.

Conclusion

Equestrian sports bear the risk for serious injuries. More females and young individuals participate in equestrian sports and therefore are injured more frequently. However, we defined men and individuals of higher age as groups of a higher risk for serious injuries. We thus conclude a necessity of reassessment in prevention questions and see a chance for the improvement of injury prevention.

Caution is required when treating patients of younger age after an equine-related accident since final risk evaluation remains unclear. We confirm that horseback riding as well as handling the horse bears a comparable risk for serious injuries.

Head injuries remain a frequent and serious consequence of equestrian sport. The protective use of helmets was confirmed before, and we again emphasise their use in all situations with the horse.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors have approved the revised manuscript and have contributed to this work and are therefore listed in the authors list.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Ethics approval The design and conduct of this study was approved by the Ethics Committeeof the University Medical Centre Goettingen.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.