Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Effects of preoperative and postoperative resistance exercise interventions on recovery of physical function in patients undergoing abdominal surgery for cancer: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
  1. David Stephensen1,
  2. Ferhana Hashem2,
  3. Kevin Corbett3,
  4. Amanda Bates2,
  5. Michelle George4,
  6. Ralph Peter Hobbs4,
  7. Malcolm Hopkins4,
  8. Irena Hutchins4,
  9. David Peter Lowery2,
  10. Tracy Pellatt-Higgins2,
  11. Charitini Stavropoulou5,
  12. Ian Swaine6,
  13. Lee Tomlinson4,
  14. Hazel Woodward4,
  15. Haythem Ali4
  1. 1 Physiotherapy Department, East Kent Hospitals University Foundation NHS Trust, Canterbury, UK
  2. 2 Centre for Health Service Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
  3. 3 Centre for Critical Research in Nursing and Midwifery, Middlesex University, London, UK
  4. 4 Research and Development, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Maidstone, UK
  5. 5 School of Health Sciences, City University London, London, UK
  6. 6 Centre for Science and Medicine in Sport and Exercise, University of Greenwich, Chatham, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr David Stephensen; david.stephensen{at}nhs.net

Abstract

Objective To systematically review the effects of preoperative and postoperative resistance exercise training on the recovery of physical function in patients undergoing abdominal surgery for cancer.

Data sources A systematic review of English articles using Medline, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library electronic databases was undertaken.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Studies were included if they used a randomised, quasi-randomised or controlled trial study design and compared the effects of a muscle-strengthening exercise intervention (±other therapy) with a comparative non-exercise group; involved adult participants (≥18 years) who had elected to undergo abdominal surgery for cancer; and used muscle strength, physical function, self-reported functional ability, range of motion and/or a performance-based test as an outcome measure.

Results Following screening of titles and abstracts of the 588 publications retrieved from the initial search, 24 studies met the inclusion criteria and were accessed for review of the full-text version of the article, and 2 eligible studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. One exercise programme was undertaken preoperatively and the other postoperatively, until discharge from hospital. The exercise interventions of the included studies were performed for five and eight sessions, respectively. There were no differences between groups in either study.

Conclusion The only two studies designed to determine whether preoperative or postoperative resistance muscle-strengthening exercise programmes improved or negatively affected physical function outcomes in patients undergoing abdominal surgery for cancer provide inconclusive results.

  • exercise training
  • cancer
  • abdomen
  • surgery
  • physical fitness

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors DS, FH, KC performed the systematic review. DS, FH, KC, AB, MG, RPH, MH, IH, DPL, TPH, CS, IS, LT, WH and HA contributed to study design, data analysis and interpretation and preparation of the manuscript.

  • Funding The study was funded by an NIHR Research for Patient Benefit grant (PB-PG-0613–31107).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Not required.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.