Article Text

Download PDFPDF

9 Exploring the change-mechanisms related to using a clinical support tool in managing adolescents with non-traumatic knee pain: a realist evaluation
  1. Simon Kristoffer Johansen1,
  2. Louise Lund Holm Thomsen2,
  3. Erika Maria Andersen3,
  4. Henrik Riel3,4,
  5. Charlotte Overgaard2,
  6. Michael Skovdal Rathleff1,3
  1. 1Center For General Practice at Aalborg University, Denmark
  2. 2Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Science, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
  3. 3Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Denmark
  4. 4Department of Physiotherapy, University College of Northern Denmark, Denmark

Abstract

Introduction Patient decision aids can support patient-clinician shared decision-making, yet little is known about the underlying change-mechanisms which facilitates patient-clinician collaboration in clinical settings. The MAP-Knee Tool was developed with GPs and adolescents with non-traumatic knee pain. It incorporated different components (diagnosis tool, credible explanations, prognostic factors, and an option grid) to support the consultation process and enhance patient-clinician collaboration. Our study was a Realist Evaluation of the effectiveness of the MAP-Knee Tool tested in a stepped-wedge randomised cluster trial in hospital settings.

Methods and Materials The Realist Evaluation investigates how, why, for whom and under which circumstances adolescents with knee pain and clinicians (GPs, physiotherapists, surgeons) benefitted from the MAP-Knee Tool though a theory-gleaning process. Data comprised intervention documents, survey data and qualitative realist interviews with researchers, adolescents, and clinicians. Thematic Realist Analysis of the qualitative data was applied, and findings were integrated with quantitative findings to establish an initial program theory and identify context-mechanism-outcome configurations.

Results Data indicated that absence of observable symptoms in adolescents increased the complexity of treatment situations, heightened diagnostic uncertainty, and complicated shared decision-making. However, clinicians employed various strategies to mitigate this complexity. Five context-mechanism-outcome configurations were identified, relating to clinicians’ confidence, recognizing patients pain experience, diagnostic uncertainty, credible explanations, defensive actions, and systemic barriers.

Conclusion Theory-gleaning indicated that the MAP-Knee tool likely facilitates shared decision-making by reducing the complexity within the treatment situation. However, additional data is needed to refine and expand the identified change-mechanisms, providing a more comprehensive understanding of their impact.

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.