Article Text

Ranking sports science and medicine interventions impacting team performance: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies in elite football
  1. Tiago Fernandes1,
  2. Vincenzo Rago2,
  3. Marta Castañer1,3,
  4. Oleguer Camerino1,3
  1. 1National Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia, University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain
  2. 2Faculty of Health and Sports Sciences, Universidade Europeia, Lisbon, Portugal
  3. 3IRBLLEIDA (Lleida Institute for Biomedical Research), Lleida, Spain
  1. Correspondence to Dr Tiago Fernandes; tiagomgfernandes{at}outlook.com

Abstract

This study protocol describes a systematic method to identify, collect and rank sports science and medicine interventions most associated with optimising team performance in elite football in observational studies. While numerous interventions, such as conditioning or injury prevention programmes, protective equipment, training periodisation, tactical decision-making, supplements, medication and hydration administration, have been associated with football players and team performance enhancement, there is a need to prioritise them to save resources and increase the efficiency of applications. Nevertheless, previous literature has shown that systematic reviews in elite football often need more protocol registration and have limited procedures, synthesis and practical implications directly applicable to the field. Therefore, this protocol outlines a comprehensive process developed following the Cochrane Collaboration and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement comprising the following stages: (1) research question formulation and preliminary study, (2) eligibility criteria, (3) search strategy, (4) study selection, (5) data collection, (6) data assessment and (7) data synthesis and statistical analysis. It also presents a data quality standard process incorporating human and large language models reviewers and a detailed flow diagram for selecting suitable quantitative synthesis and ranking techniques. It includes meta-regression, pairwise, network, Bayesian or hierarchical meta-analysis options. The project associated and pre-registration of the protocol is available on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/tzcxq/).

  • Research methods
  • Evidence synthesis
  • Multidisciplinary team
  • Team sports
  • Soccer

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information.

View Full Text

Supplementary materials

Footnotes

  • X @tiagomgf1, @vincenzo_ra

  • Contributors TF: conceptualisation, methodology, software, visualisation, writing–original draft. VR: conceptualisation, writing–reviewing and editing. MC: resources, supervision. OC: conceptualisation, methodology, visualisation, supervision. TF is the guarantor. The OpenAI’s ChatGPT-4o was used for supporting R coding and manuscript revision, in which the authors check and edit the content for publication.

  • Funding The work is supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia) (2021.0581.BD).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient and public involvement Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.