Introduction
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease characterised by the destruction of pancreatic islets’ insulin-producing cells. Around 400 000 people in the UK are currently living with T1D, with incidence rates rising by an estimated 4% every year.1 People with T1D are dependent on exogenous insulin therapy for symptom management and mitigation of long-term adverse health outcomes resulting from poor glycaemic control. The most comprehensive analysis estimates that the disease costs the National Health Service (NHS) over £1.5 billion annually.2
At the time of diagnosis, many people with T1D present with residual β-cell function, often measured by detectable levels of C-peptide in the circulation.3 These levels progressively decline within 7 years of diagnosis, reflecting functional β-cell loss, followed by stabilisation.4 Impaired β-cell function results in compromised metabolic control, increased insulin requirements and a heightened risk of disease complications.5 Highly differentiated, autoantigen-primed CD8+ T-cells are enriched in insulitis lesions and thus are considered the major protagonists in β-cell destruction.6 Pharmacological methods to target CD8+ T-cell activation have been explored, with anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody teplizumab recently gaining Food and Drug Administration approval for T1D treatment. However, the timeline for the impact on people with T1D is unclear, as Medicines and Healthcare products Regulation Agency (MHRA) approval in the UK is still pending. Furthermore, the risk of adverse effects and limited long-term success of immunotherapy drugs, including teplizumab, continues to restrict treatment options for many people with T1D due to targeting of non-islet-specific T-cells.7 Developing cost-effective and self-managed strategies to reduce immune-mediated decline in β-cell function is paramount for people with recent-onset T1D.
To this end, mounting evidence supports the inclusion of exercise in T1D care.8 In addition to improving aerobic fitness, muscle strength and flexibility, blood lipid profiles and reducing daily insulin requirements, regular structured exercise has reduced all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease risk in people with T1D.9 As a result, the American Diabetes Association recommends all adults with T1D engage in 150 min or more of moderate-intensity to vigorous-intensity activity per week.10 However, many people with T1D fail to reach these guidelines, commonly citing fear of hypoglycaemia and a lack of knowledge on how to manage their condition as major barriers.11
The influence of different modes, durations and intensities of exercise on acute and chronic glycaemic control has been explored previously in T1D cohorts. The literature largely supports the notion that high-intensity exercise bouts exhibit a lower incidence of acute hypoglycaemic events than moderate-intensity continuous bouts.12 Furthermore, over time, supervised and home-based high-intensity interval training (HIIT) interventions have been reported to improve chronic glycaemic control,13 daily insulin dose14 15 and cardiorespiratory fitness.14 16 HIIT also removes commonly perceived barriers to exercise in people with T1D (eg, time-efficiency and cost), with the short duration and the option to complete sessions in a home environment with little to no equipment resulting in high adherence and compliance (95%±2% and 99%±1%, respectively).14 However, the effect of HIIT on total glycaemic variability has yielded mixed results,17 18 highlighting the need for further research and the inclusion of continuous glucose monitoring systems.
Direct evidence supporting exercise-induced β-cell preservation in T1D largely comes from studies of rodents. Exercise training has been reported to increase proliferation, preserve morphology and improve insulin production of islet β-cells.19 These effects extend to the immune system, whereby training can reduce the infiltration of immune cells into pancreatic islets and reduce insulitis by 50%.20 In humans, following the introduction of exogenous insulin in people with T1D, a ‘honeymoon phase’ of partial recovery of β-cell function, clinically defined as an insulin dose-adjusted A1C ≤9, is observed.21 Retrospective case-control data indicate that this period of remission is up to fivefold longer in physically active individuals with T1D compared with those who were sedentary. Moreover, pilot data indicate adults with T1D who engage in regular moderate-to-vigorous exercise may have a delayed decline in β-cell function compared with inactive controls22 and lower T1D-specific autoantibodies.23 A recent trial in children with multiple diabetes-related autoantibodies also reported a relationship between higher activity time and lower risk of T1D progression.24 These data indicate that regular physical activity might protect against loss of β-cell function with disease progression; however, its impact on disease-specific autoimmunity has not been investigated.
Regular exercise induces anti-inflammatory effects at the systemic and tissue level.25 Notably, exercise training can limit the accumulation of senescent and exhausted CD8+ T-cells in the peripheral blood compartment of healthy individuals26 and mitigate the contribution of these cells in mediating abnormal glucose homeostasis in adults with type 2 diabetes.27 Although these data indicate regular exercise can modulate T-cell phenotype, whether these effects are apparent in CD8+ T-cells that specifically drive T1D pathology is unknown. To this end, using peptide-human leucocyte antigen class I tetramer staining coupled with flow cytometry, longitudinal studies in people with T1D have revealed that β-cell-reactive CD8+ T-cells acquired enhanced effector function during the period leading to clinical diagnosis. Interestingly, both individuals with T1D and healthy controls had a similar frequency of islet-reactive CD8+ T-cells in peripheral blood.28 Cell cycle analysis has also been used to separate actively proliferating cells from resting counterparts, revealing that a subset of people with T1D have a higher frequency of islet-reactive CD8+ T-cells in the S-G2/M phase (termed islet-reactive CD8+ T Double S for T cells in S-phase in Sanguine (TDS) cells) than healthy controls. Moreover, these cells show phenotypic markers associated with highly aggressive effector function.29 Given the immune modulation induced by regular structured physical exercise, including anti-inflammatory effects and reduction in CD8+ T-cell senescence, evaluation of T-cell autoimmunity by enumerating changes in islet-reactive CD8+ TDS cells is an important knowledge gap to address.
Aims
Primary: to investigate whether a 12-week home-based HIIT programme reduces the frequency of islet-reactive CD8+ TDS cells in people with recently diagnosed T1D compared with a control period of habitual activity.
Secondary: to determine associations between changes in islet-reactive CD8+ TDS cells and clinical markers of T1D (ie, C-peptide, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and glycaemic variability) after control and exercise periods.
Hypothesis
We hypothesise that compared with 12 weeks of habitual activity, 12 weeks of HIIT will lead to reduced frequency of islet-reactive CD8+ TDS cells and improved clinical outcome measures (glycaemic control, glycated haemoglobin and insulin dose).