Elsevier

Preventive Medicine

Volume 72, March 2015, Pages 34-43
Preventive Medicine

Review
The effect of walking on risk factors for cardiovascular disease: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.12.041Get rights and content

Highlights

  • 32 RCTs examining the effect of walking on risk factors for cardiovascular disease were included.

  • Walking improved aerobic fitness (10.5%) and systolic (− 3%) and diastolic blood pressure (− 2%).

  • Walking improved several measures of adiposity but did not alter blood lipids significantly.

Abstract

Objective

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials that examined the effect of walking on risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

Methods

Four electronic databases and reference lists were searched (Jan 1971–June 2012). Two authors identified randomised control trials of interventions ≥ 4 weeks in duration that included at least one group with walking as the only treatment and a no-exercise comparator group. Participants were inactive at baseline. Pooled results were reported as weighted mean treatment effects and 95% confidence intervals using a random effects model.

Results

32 articles reported the effects of walking interventions on cardiovascular disease risk factors. Walking increased aerobic capacity (3.04 mL/kg/min, 95% CI 2.48 to 3.60) and reduced systolic (− 3.58 mm Hg, 95% CI − 5.19 to − 1.97) and diastolic (− 1.54 mm Hg, 95% CI − 2.83 to − 0.26) blood pressure, waist circumference (− 1.51 cm, 95% CI − 2.34 to − 0.68), weight (− 1.37 kg, 95% CI − 1.75 to − 1.00), percentage body fat (− 1.22%, 95% CI − 1.70 to − 0.73) and body mass index (− 0.53 kg/m2, 95% CI − 0.72 to − 0.35) but failed to alter blood lipids.

Conclusions

Walking interventions improve many risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

This underscores the central role of walking in physical activity for health promotion.

Introduction

Physical inactivity is the fourth leading cause of global mortality (World Health Organisation, 2009) responsible for 6–10% of the major non-communicable diseases of coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and breast and colon cancers (Lee et al., 2012). Whilst sport, running and vigorous gym based exercise are often seen as counter measures, walking offers a natural, widely accepted, low cost, low injury risk (Hootman et al., 2001) and environmentally friendly approach to physical activity which can be incorporated into activities of daily living and/or undertaken recreationally. Walking is also likely to be more accessible and suitable to a considerable portion of the higher-risk population who may be obese, sedentary, at high risk of cardiovascular disease and for whom strenuous forms of exercise may be unsuitable. Walking at a self-selected pace is moderate intensity for most adults (Ainsworth et al., 2000, Murtagh et al., 2002). Indeed it is estimated that walking at 3 mph would be vigorous intensity for approximately 20% of the population (Kelly et al., 2011). Systematic reviews have indicated that inactive people can be encouraged to walk more by tailored interventions (Ogilvie et al., 2007) and the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence has recently produced guidelines to promote walking for travel and recreational purposes (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2012).

Whilst it is unsurprising that walking has become a cornerstone of physical activity promotion strategies, a challenge faced by healthcare professionals and patients is knowing the effects of walking on health, especially as many published walking interventions employ relatively small samples and findings are often inconsistent between studies. Conversely, the use of meta-analysis increases the precision and accuracy of the estimates of the effects of walking, quantifies the inconsistency between studies and enhances generalizability to a larger population. We previously reported a meta-analysis of walking interventions published up to 2004, that included aerobic fitness, blood pressure, and body composition (Murphy et al., 2007). Since then there has been an increase in the number of published interventions examining the effects of walking on risk factors for cardiovascular disease. In addition, an increased range of outcome measures have been included in these studies, such as blood lipids and several measures of adiposity. Whilst there is now greater evidence of the concomitant dangers of these factors to public health (Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee, 2008) a recent comprehensive synthesis of evidence from randomised control trials on the effect of walking on health is lacking. This updated meta-analysis therefore expands our understanding of the treatment–effect relationship between walking and health.

The objective of this study was to assess the effect of walking interventions on risk factors for cardiovascular disease in previously inactive adults. This updates our previous review and provides healthcare professionals with a synthesis of the effects accruing when inactive adults undertake a walking programme.

Section snippets

Methods

We followed the PRISMA statement (preferred reporting items for systemic reviews and meta-analyses) in conducting and reporting the meta-analysis (Moher et al., 2009). A review protocol has not been published separately.

Study selection

A total of 210 articles were identified by electronic searches and 16 articles from hand-searching. Thirty one duplicates were then excluded. After reviewing the title and abstract of the 195 articles identified, 150 were excluded as they did not meet the inclusion criteria. The full text versions of 45 articles were then reviewed. Fifteen studies were deemed eligible for inclusion in the study and combined with studies reported in our previous meta-analysis (Murphy et al., 2007) (n = 17).

Discussion

This updated systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that walking programmes improve several markers of cardiovascular risk, including aerobic capacity, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and adiposity (waist circumference, body mass, percentage body fat and body mass index) in previously inactive but apparently healthy adults. However there was no evidence of changes in total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol or waist-to-hip ratio. In this updated meta-analysis we analysed

Conclusions

Our findings confirm the important role that regular walking can play in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. The meta-analysis revealed positive changes for multiple cardiovascular disease risk factors, including aerobic fitness, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and several measures of adiposity in previously inactive adults who walked as part of a randomised controlled trial. Clinicians and health-care providers can prescribe walking with confidence that it will evoke health

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

Funding was received from the Mary Immaculate College Research Directorate Seed-funding scheme for assistance with data extraction. This funder had no role in the study.

References (70)

  • E.M. Murtagh et al.

    The effects of 60 minutes of brisk walking per week, accumulated in two different patterns, on cardiovascular risk

    Prev. Med.

    (2005)
  • B. Nicklas et al.

    Effect of exercise intensity on abdominal fat loss during calorie restriction in overweight and obese postmenopausal women: a randomized, controlled trial

    Am. J. Clin. Nutr.

    (2009)
  • K.B. Osei-Tutu et al.

    The effects of short- vs. long-bout exercise on mood, VO2max., and percent body fat

    Prev. Med.

    (2005)
  • C.K. Probart et al.

    The effect of moderate aerobic exercise on physical-fitness among women 70 years and older

    Maturitas

    (1991)
  • M.A. Tully et al.

    Brisk walking, fitness, and cardiovascular risk: a randomized controlled trial in primary care

    Prev. Med.

    (2005)
  • B.E. Ainsworth et al.

    Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities

    Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.

    (2000)
  • American College of Sports Medicine

    ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription

    (2010)
  • T.M. Asikainen et al.

    Randomised, controlled walking trials in postmenopausal women: the minimum dose to improve aerobic fitness?

    Br. J. Sports Med.

    (2002)
  • T.M. Asikainen et al.

    Walking trials in postmenopausal women: effect of one vs two daily bouts on aerobic fitness

    Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports

    (2002)
  • G. Baker et al.

    The effect of a pedometer-based community walking intervention “Walking for Wellbeing in the West” on physical activity levels and health outcomes: a 12-week randomized controlled trial

    Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act.

    (2008)
  • G.J. Bell et al.

    A comparison of fitness training to a pedometer-based walking program matched for total energy cost

    J. Phys. Act. Health

    (2010)
  • S.N. Blair et al.

    Editorial: physical fitness and activity as separate heart disease risk factors: a meta-analysis

    Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.

    (2001)
  • S.N. Blair et al.

    Changes in physical-fitness and all-cause mortality — a prospective-study of healthy and unhealthy men

    JAMA

    (1995)
  • S.N. Blair et al.

    Is physical activity or physical fitness more important in defining health benefits?

    Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.

    (2001)
  • L.J. Brandon et al.

    Walking, body composition, and blood pressure dose–response in African American and white women

    Ethn. Dis.

    (2006)
  • M. Briel et al.

    Association between change in high density lipoprotein cholesterol and cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality: systematic review and meta-regression analysis

    BMJ

    (2009)
  • L.R. Butcher et al.

    Low-intensity exercise exerts beneficial effects on plasma lipids via PPAR [gamma]

    Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.

    (2008)
  • L. de Koning et al.

    Waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio as predictors of cardiovascular events: meta-regression analysis of prospective studies

    Eur. Heart J.

    (2007)
  • C. Dobbelsteyn et al.

    A comparative evaluation of waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and body mass index as indicators of cardiovascular risk factors. The Canadian Heart Health Surveys

    Int. J. Obes.

    (2001)
  • J.J. Duncan et al.

    Women walking for health and fitness — how much is enough

    JAMA

    (1991)
  • A.L. Dunn et al.

    Comparison of lifestyle and structured interventions to increase physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness — a randomized trial

    JAMA

    (1999)
  • B.M. Egan et al.

    US trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension, 1988–2008

    JAMA

    (2010)
  • M. Egger et al.

    Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

    BMJ

    (1997)
  • C. Ewing Garber et al.

    American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise

    Med. Sci. Sports Exerc.

    (2011)
  • Expert Panel on Detection EvalWalking improved aerobic fitness (10.5%), systolic (-3%) and diastolic blood pressure (-2%).Linda Nicholsuation and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults

    Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)

    JAMA

    (2001)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text