Elsevier

Metabolism

Volume 65, Issue 5, May 2016, Pages 599-608
Metabolism

Clinical Science
Targeting specific interstitial glycemic parameters with high-intensity interval exercise and fasted-state exercise in type 2 diabetes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2016.01.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Aims

To compare the acute glycemic responses to a bout of high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) and energy-matched moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE) performed under fasted and postprandial conditions.

Methods

A randomized, controlled, crossover design was used. Ten individuals with type 2 diabetes were each tested in five experimental conditions after an overnight fast: 1) fasted-state HIIE (HIIEfast); 2) post-breakfast HIIE (HIIEfed); 3) fasted-state MICE (MICEfast); 4) post-breakfast MICE (MICEfed); and 5) no exercise (control). MICE was performed at workload corresponding to 55% of V.V̇O2peak, whereas HIIE was composed of repetitions of three minutes at workload corresponding to 40% followed by one minute at workload corresponding to 100% V.V̇̇O2peak. Interstitial glucose was monitored by continuous glucose monitoring over 24 h under standardized diet and medication.

Results

Fasted-state exercise attenuated postprandial glycemic increments (p < 0.05) to a greater extent than post-breakfast exercise did. HIIE reduced nocturnal and fasting glycemia on the day following exercise more than MICE did (main effect: both p < 0.05). Compared to the control condition, HIIEfast lowered most interstitial glycemic parameters, i.e., 24-h mean glucose (− 1.5 mmol·l 1; p < 0.05), fasting glucose (− 1.0 mmol·l 1; p < 0.05), overall postprandial glycemic increment (− 257 mmol·360 min·l 1; p < 0.05), glycemic variability (− 1.79 mmol·l 1; p < 0.05), and time spent in hyperglycemia (− 283 min; p < 0.05).

Conclusion

This study showed that HIIE is more effective than MICE in lowering nocturnal/fasting glycemia. Exercise performed in the fasted state reduces postprandial glycemic increments to a greater extent than post-breakfast exercise does. Performing HIIE under fasted condition may be most advantageous as it lowered most aspects of glycemia.

Introduction

Elevated blood glucose, including postprandial and fasting hyperglycemia [1], as well as labile glycemic concentrations [2], has been identified as an independent risk factor for the development of diabetic complications. There have been several meta-analyses demonstrating that, on average, exercise has a clinically meaningful impact on glycemic control as measured by glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) [3], [4]. However, it is less clear whether exercise can be tailored to favor preferential reductions in specific glycemic parameters.

A recent systematic review investigating the effects of exercise on interstitial glycemic parameters measured by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) showed that aerobic exercise typically lowers postprandial but not fasting glucose [5]. Postprandial hyperglycemia is considered to be more strongly associated with insulin resistance at the level of skeletal muscles, whereas fasting glycemia reflects hepatic insulin resistance [6]. Thus, it is possible that some types of exercise improve muscular insulin sensitivity but have little effects on the hepatic insulin sensitivity. Additionally, it is also possible that the negligible effect of exercise on circulating fasting glucose concentrations is due to a short-lasting effect of traditionally used exercise interventions because circulating fasting glucose concentration is often measured on the day subsequent to exercise.

Modification to exercise interventions in order to favor different effects on muscle versus liver glycogen could have different effects on various glucose parameters. Two such strategies may be high-intensity and fasted-state exercise. An increasingly appreciated approach to increase exercise intensity in T2D is high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE) [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], which involves alternating between repetitions of high-intensity exercise bouts (≥ 70% of maximum or peak oxygen consumption [12], or 80%–100% of maximal heart rate [13], [14]) and lower-intensity recovery periods. Brief bouts of high intensity exercise facilitate muscular glycogenolysis and may stimulate translocation of glucose transporters to a greater degree than lower intensity continuous exercise does [14], [15]. Consequently, glucose uptake during exercise, as well as post-exercise insulin sensitivity, is expected to differ between HIIE and moderate-intensity continuous exercise (MICE; typically defined as 40%–60% of maximum or peak oxygen consumption) [16]. In addition, a previous study has shown that HIIE suppresses hepatic glucose production and thereby fasting blood glucose of individuals with T2D [17].

Glycemic responses to exercise may also be manipulated by altering carbohydrate availability. Although performed predominantly on non-diabetic individuals, pre-prandial exercise resulted in more sustained reduction of blood glucose concentration compared to postprandial exercise, presumably because of greater depletion of hepatic glycogen stores [18]. Therefore, the effects of fasted-state exercise on glycemic parameters may differ from those of post-meal exercise.

To date, no study has simultaneously investigated the effects of HIIE and energy-matched MICE, and the effects of fasted-state and postprandial exercise on glycemic parameters. The primary purpose of the study was to compare the effects of HIIE and MICE, as well as fasted-state and post-breakfast exercise, on daily mean, postprandial and fasting interstitial glycemia. A secondary purpose was to contrast the aforementioned glycemic responses following each of the four exercise conditions (fasted-state HIIE and MICE, and post-breakfast HIIE and MICE) with a sedentary, control condition. We hypothesized that HIIE and fasted-state exercise would improve interstitial fasting and postprandial glycemia to greater degrees than MICE and post-breakfast exercise, respectively. We also hypothesized that the combination of HIIE and fasted-state would improve both fasting and postprandial glycemia.

Section snippets

Research Design

A randomized controlled crossover research design was used. Each participant was studied under five separate experimental conditions: fasted-state HIIE (HIIEfast), post-breakfast HIIE (HIIEfed), fasted-state MICE (MICEfast), post-breakfast MICE (MICEfed), and no exercise (control), in random order separated by 48 h. The randomization of the condition order was performed separately for each participant with no additional methods, such as counterbalancing, to control the order. Forty-eight hours

Participants

Eight males and two females participated in the study (Table 1). One participant only completed three testing conditions due to injury not related to the study. Of the ten participants, five were treated with metformin alone. The others were treated with metformin + sitagliptin, metformin + glyburide, metformin/sitagliptin + gliclazide, metformin + gliclazide, or metformin + saxagliptin + glyclazide.

Laboratory Measures

Fasting capillary blood glucose, HR, RER and V.O2 measured upon arrival at the laboratory did not differ

Discussion

The major findings of this study are that: 1) fasted-state exercise reduced total postprandial interstitial glycemic increment more than post-breakfast exercise did; 2) HIIE decreased nocturnal and fasting glycemia to a greater extent than energy-matched MICE did; and 3) compared to a non-exercise day, HIIEfast improved most aspects of interstitial glycemic parameters (i.e., 24-h mean, MAGE, t> 10.0 mmol·l 1, postprandial and fasting glucose). Thus, our hypotheses were supported by these

Conclusion

In conclusion, our results show that it is possible to tailor exercise intervention to target specific aspects of interstitial glycemia. High-intensity interval exercise may be incorporated to reduce nocturnal and fasting glucose, while fasted-state exercise can be used to target subsequent postprandial glucose excursions. Given that deteriorated fasting glucose and postprandial glucose contribute differently to the overall hyperglycemia [45] tailoring exercise interventions to target specific

Author Contributions

T.T. designed the study, collected the data, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. B.J.W. screened participants and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. N.K. and E.M-C. collected data and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. G.J.B. and L.J.M. designed the study, contributed to discussion and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. N.B.G. designed the study and wrote the manuscript. T.T. is the guarantor of the study and has full access to all the data in the

Funding

Funding for this study was provided by University of Alberta Faculty of Physical Education & Recreation Human Performance Scholarship Fund.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References (45)

  • M. Abdul-Ghani et al.

    Insulin secretion and insulin action in subjectswith impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT)

    Diabetes

    (2006)
  • J.B. Gillen et al.

    Acute high-intensity interval exercise reduces the postprandial glucose response and prevalence of hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes

    Diabetes Obes Metab

    (2012)
  • K. Karstoft et al.

    The effects of free-living interval-walking training on glycemic control, body composition, and physical fitness in type 2 diabetic patients: a randomized, controlled trial

    Diabetes Care

    (2013)
  • K. Karstoft et al.

    The acute effects of interval- vs. continuous-walking exercise on glycemic control in subjects with type 2 diabetes: a cross-over, controlled study

    J Clin Endocrinol Metab

    (2014)
  • J.P. Little et al.

    Low-volume high-intensity interval training reduces hyperglycemia and increases muscle mitochondrial capacity in patients with type 2 diabetes

    J Appl Physiol

    (2011)
  • M.E. Francois et al.

    Effectiveness and safety of high-intensity interval training in patients with type 2 diabetes

    Diabetes Spectr

    (2015)
  • K.S. Weston et al.

    High-intensity interval training in patients with lifestyle-induced cardiometabolic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Br J Sports Med

    (2014)
  • M.J. Gibala et al.

    Physiological and health-related adaptations to low-volume interval training: influences of nutrition and sex

    Sports Med

    (2014)
  • J.A. Hawley et al.

    What's new since hippocrates? Preventing type 2 diabetes by physical exercise and diet

    Diabetologia

    (2012)
  • M.J. Gibala et al.

    Just HIT it! A time-efficient exercise strategy to improve muscle insulin sensitivity

    J Physiol

    (2010)
  • J.T. Devlin et al.

    Enhanced peripheral and splanchnic insulin sensitivity in NIDDM men after single bout of exercise

    Diabetes

    (1987)
  • K.T. Borer et al.

    Two bouts of exercise before meals, but not after meals, lower fasting blood glucose

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (2009)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text