Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Outcome and knee-related quality of life after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a long-term follow-up

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

The aim of the present investigation was to study patient-reported long-term outcome after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. On an average 11.5 years after ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft 56 patients were asked to answer four different questionnaires about their knee function and knee-related quality of life. Another aim was to study whether there were any correlations between clinical tests, commonly used for evaluating patients with ACL injuries, which were performed 2 years after ACL reconstruction, and patient-reported outcome in terms of knee function and knee-related quality of life on an average 9.5 years later. All patients who had unilateral BPTB ACL reconstructions were examined at 2 years and on an average 11.5 years after surgery. At 2 years one-leg hop test for distance, isokinetic muscle torque measurement, sagittal knee laxity, Lysholm knee scoring scale and Tegner activity scale were used for clinical evaluation. At the follow-up on an average 9.5 years later the patients were evaluated with knee injury osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), short form health survey (SF 36), Lysholm knee scoring scale and Tegner activity scale. The SF-36 showed that the patients had a similar health condition as an age- and gender-matched normal population in Sweden on an average 11.5 years after ACL reconstruction. There was no correlation between the results of one-leg hop test for distance, isokinetic muscle torque measurement, sagittal knee laxity evaluated 2 years after surgery and the result of KOOS (function in sport and recreation, knee-related quality of life) and SF-36 evaluated on an average 11.5 years after surgery. We also compared patients that 2 years after surgery demonstrated a side-to-side difference in anterior–posterior knee laxity of more than 3 mm with those with 3 mm or less and found no significant group differences in terms of knee function as determined with KOOS. We found no correlation between the results of KOOS and SF-36 at the long-term follow-up and the time between injury and surgery, age at surgery or gender, respectively. We conclude that there is no correlation between patient-reported knee function in sport and recreation and knee-related quality of life on an average 11.5 years after BPTP ACL reconstruction and the evaluation methods used 2 years after surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Giron F et al (1997) Arthroscopic-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the central third patellar tendon. A 5–8-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:138–144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson C, Gillquist J (1990) Instrumented testing for evaluation of sagittal knee laxity. Clin Orthop 256:178–184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bach BR Jr, Jones GT, Sweet FA et al (1994) Arthroscopy-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon substitution. Two- to four-year follow-up results. Am J Sports Med 22:758–767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bach BR Jr, Tradonsky S, Bojchuk J et al (1998) Arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft. Five- to nine-year follow-up evaluation. Am J Sports Med 26:20–29

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brandsson S, Faxén E, Kartus J, Jerre R et al (2001) A prospective four- to seven-year follow-up after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Scand J Med Sci Sports 11:23–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen CH, Chuang TY, Wang KC et al (2006) Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft: clinical outcome in 4–7 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:1077–1085

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. De Haven K (1991) Operative arthroscopy. Raven, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Delay BS, Smolinski RJ, Wind WM et al (2001) Current practices and opinions in ACL reconstruction and rehabilitation: results of a survey of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine. Am J Knee Surg Spring 14:85–91

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Engstrom B, Gornitzka J, Johansson C et al (1993) Knee function after anterior cruciate ligament ruptures treated conservatively. Int Orthop 17:208–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Feagin JA Jr, Wills RP, Lambert KL et al (1997) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Bone-patella tendon-bone versus semitendinosus anatomic reconstruction. Clin Orthop 341:69–72

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frobell RB, Lohmander LS, Roos H (2007) Acute rotational trauma to the knee: poor agreement between clinical assessment and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Scand J Med Sci Sports 17:109–114

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fu FH, Schulte KR (1996) Anteror cruciate ligament surgery State of the art? Clin Orthop 325:19–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Good L, Odensten M, Gillquist J (1994) Sagittal knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a patellar tendon strip: a two-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 22:518–523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hefti F, Muller W, Jakob RP et al (1993) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1:226–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson DS, Smith RB (2001) Outcome measurement in the ACL deficient knee—what’s the score? Knee 8:51–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kleipool AE, Zijl JA, Willems WJ (1998) Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft or autograft. A prospective study with an average follow up of 4 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:224–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Laxdal G, Kartus J, Ejerhed L et al (2005) Outcome and risk factors after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a follow-up study of 948 patients. Arthroscopy 21:958–964

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10:150–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Maletius W, Messner K (1999) Eighteen- to twenty-four-year follow-up after complete rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 27:711–717

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Marx RG, Jones EC, Allen AA et al (2001) Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of four knee outcome scales for athletic patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:1459–1469

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mitsou A, Vallianatos P (1996) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using a patellar tendon autograft. A long term follow up. Int Orthop 20:285–289

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Moller E, Forssblad M, Hansson L et al (2001) Bracing versus nonbracing in rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized prospective study with 2-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:102–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mangine RE (1991) Abnormal lower limb symmetry determined by function hop tests after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Am J Sports Med 19:513–518

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nyland J, Johnson DL, Caborn DN et al (2002) Internal health status belief and lower perceived functional deficit are related among anterior cruciate ligament-deficient patients. Arthroscopy 18:515–518

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nyland J, Cottrell B, Harreld K et al (2006) Self-reported outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an internal health locus of control score comparison. Arthroscopy 22:1225–1232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Odensten M, Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1983) Long-term follow-up study of a distal iliotibial band transfer (dit) for anterolateral knee instability. Clin Orthop 176:129–135

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Patel JV, Church JS, Hall AJ (2000) Central third bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 5-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 16:67–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Persson LO, Karlsson J, Bengtsson C et al (1998) The swedish sf-36 health survey. II. Evaluation of clinical validity: results from population studies of elderly and women in Gothenborg. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1095–1103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Roos EM, Roos HP, Ekdahl C et al (1998) Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (koos)—validation of a Swedish version. Scand J Med Sci Sports 8:439–448

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS et al (1998) Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (koos)—development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28:88–96

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS (1999) Womac osteoarthritis index—additional dimensions for use in subjects with post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the knee. Western Ontario and Macmaster Universities. Osteoarthr Cartil 7:216–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Roos H, Ornell M, Bärdsell P et al (1995) Soccer after anterior cruciate ligament injury-an incompatible combination? A national survey of incidence and risk factors and a 7-year follow-up of 310 players. Acta Orthop Scand 66:107–112

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Rosenberg TD (1984) Arthroscopic techniques for anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Acufex Microsurgical Inc., Norwood

  34. Rosenberg TD (1991) Endoscopic technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with pro-trac tibial guide. Acufex Microsurgical Inc., Mansfield

  35. Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Refshauge K et al (2006) Long-term outcome of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft: minimum 13-year review. Am J Sports Med 34:721–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sernert N, Kartus J, Kohler K et al (1999) Analysis of subjective, objective and functional examination tests after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A follow-up of 527 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:160–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Sernert N, Kartus J, Kohler K et al (2002) Comparison of functional outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction resulting in low, normal and increased laxity. Scand J Med Sci Sports 12:47–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Shapiro ET, Richmond JC, Rockett SE et al (1996) The use of a generic, patient-based health assessment (sf-36) for evaluation of patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 24:196–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Shelbourne KD, Gray T (1997) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon graft followed by accelerated rehabilitation. A two- to nine-year followup. Am J Sports Med 25:786–795

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Shelbourne KD, Gray T (2000) Results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction based on meniscus and articular cartilage status at the time of surgery. Five- to fifteen-year evaluations. Am J Sports Med 28:446–452

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Spindler KP, Warren TA, Callison JC Jr et al (2005) Clinical outcome at a minimum of five years after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1673–1679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sullivan M, Karlsson J (1998) The swedish sf-36 health survey. III. Evaluation of criterion-based validity: results from normative population. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1105–1113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Ware JE Jr (1995) The swedish sf-36 health survey. I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. Soc Sci Med 41:1349–1358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Thomee TP, Wahrborg P, Borjesson M et al (2006) A new instrument for measuring self-efficacy in patients with an anterior cruciate ligament injury. Scand J Med Sci Sports 16:181–187

    Google Scholar 

  46. Thomee TP, Wahrborg P, Borjesson M et al (2007) Self-efficacy, symptoms and physical activity in patients with an anterior cruciate ligament injury: a prospective study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 17:238–245

    Google Scholar 

  47. von Porat A, Roos EM, Roos H (2004) High prevalence of osteoarthritis 14 years after an anterior cruciate ligament tear in male soccer players: a study of radiographic and patient relevant outcomes. Ann Rheum Dis 63:269–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Wilk KE, Romaniello WT, Soscia SM, Arrigo CA, Andrews JR (1994) The relationship between subjective knee scores, isokinetic testing, and functional testing in the ACL-reconstructed knee. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 20:60–73

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm Sports Trauma Research Center, Sophiahemmet, Box 5605, 114 86, Stockholm, Sweden

    Eva Möller, Lars Weidenhielm & Suzanne Werner

  2. Capio Artro Clinic, Box 5605, 114 86, Stockholm, Sweden

    Eva Möller & Suzanne Werner

Authors
  1. Eva Möller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lars Weidenhielm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Suzanne Werner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eva Möller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Möller, E., Weidenhielm, L. & Werner, S. Outcome and knee-related quality of life after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a long-term follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17, 786–794 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-0788-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-0788-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation