Skip to main content
Log in

A study for testing the sensitivity and reliability of the Lysholm knee scoring scale

  • Knee Injuries
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

The aim of the present investigation was to test the Lysholm knee scoring scale from 1985 for sensitivity and reliability. Thirty-one patients with one of four different diagnoses: anterior cruciate ligament rupture (ACL), meniscus tear (MT), patello-femoral pain syndrome (PFPS) and lateral ankle sprain (LAS) participated in the study. None of the patients were in the acute phase of injury, and none had undergone surgery. Each patient was interviewed by telephone and gave answers to the Lysholm knee scoring scale verbally, while the interviewer wrote down their replies. This was done on three different occasions, days 1, 3 and 14. The results showed that the ACL group scored the highest (81.1 of possible 100 points) and differed significantly (P<0.01) from the other three groups. Thus, the Lysholm knee scoring scale was less sensitive for the ACL patients, for whom it was originally designed, than for the other three diagnostic categories. The reliability was highest between the two first testing times, days 1 and 3 (r=0.75,P<0.0001).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnold JA, Coker TP, Heaton LM et al (1979) Natural history of anterior cruciate tears. Am J Sports Med 7:305

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bach BR Jr, Jones GT, Sweet FA, Hager CA (1994) Arthroscopy-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patella tendon substitution. Two-to-four year follow-up results. Am J Sports Med 22:758–767

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bloom MH (1989) Differentiating between meniscal and patellar pain. Phys Sports Med 7:95–108

    Google Scholar 

  4. Denti M, Monteleone M, Bernardi A, Arosio A (1994) Medial patellar synovial plica syndrome, the influence associated pathology on long-term results. Chir Degli Organi Movimento 79:273–277

    Google Scholar 

  5. Engström B (1993) Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament deficiency — with special emphasis on soccer injuries. Thesis, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  6. Feagin JA Jr, Blake WP (1983) Post-operative evaluation and results recording in the anterior curciate ligament reconstructed knee. Clin Orthop 172:143

    Google Scholar 

  7. Greens S, Clayton ML, Liedholt JD et al (1974) One-hundred point scale for assessment of knee disability. In: Smillie I (ed) Diseases of the knee joint. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, p. 28

    Google Scholar 

  8. International Knee Documentation Committee (ESSKA & AOSSM) (1991) Knee ligament standard evaluation form. Congress of the International Society of the Knee, Toronto, Canada

  9. Jensen NC, Riis J, Robertson K, Holm AR (1994) Arthroscopic repair of the ruptured meniscus, one to 6.3 years follow-up. Arthroscopy 10:211–214

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kettelkamp D, Thompson C (1975) Development of aknee scoring scale. Clin Orthop 107:93–99

    Google Scholar 

  11. Knaepler H, Schenk C (1994) The new Marburg rehabilitation concept. On the status of exercise equipment within the scope of rehabilitation of patients after surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament. Akuel Traumatol 24:17–23

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kuhne JH, Jansson V, Hoppert M et al (1994) Ergebnisse der operativen Behandlung posterior Knieinstabilitäten. Unfallchirurg 97:151–158

    Google Scholar 

  13. Larson R (1974) Rating sheet for knee function. In: Smillie I (ed) Diseases of the knee joint. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 29–30

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis n use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10:150–154

    Google Scholar 

  15. Marshall KL, Fetto J, Botero P (1977) Knee ligament injuries. A standardised evaluation method. Clin Orthop 123: 115–129

    Google Scholar 

  16. Renström P, Kannus P (1994) Injuries of the foot and ankle. In: De Lee JC, Drez Jr D (eds) Orthopaedic sports medicine. Principles and practice. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1708–1710

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tegner Y (1985) Cruciate ligament injuries in the knee Evaluation and rehabilitation. Thesis, University of Linköping, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop 198:43–49

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tegner Y, Lysholm J, Lysholm M, Gillquist J (1986) Strengthening exercises for old cruciate ligament tears. Acta Orthop Scand 57:130–134

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tegner Y, Lysholm J, Odenstam M, Gillquist J (1988) Evaluation of cruciate ligament injuries. A review. Acta Orthop Scand 59:336–341

    Google Scholar 

  21. Turba JE, Walsh MW, McLeod WD (1979) Long term results of extensor mechanism reconstruction. A standard for evaluation. Am J Sports Med 7: 91–94

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vaatainen U, Kiviranta I, Jaroma H, Airaksinen I (1994) Lateral release in chondromalacia patellae using clinical, radiologic, electromyographic and muscle force testing evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75:1127–1131

    Google Scholar 

  23. Werner S (1993) Patello-femoral pain syndrome — an experimental clinical investigation. Thesis, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bengtsson, J., Möllborg, J. & Werner, S. A study for testing the sensitivity and reliability of the Lysholm knee scoring scale. Knee Surg, Sports traumatol, Arthroscopy 4, 27–31 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01565994

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01565994

Key words

Navigation