Table 2

Results of the Downs and Black21 methodological quality assessment ranked by overall quality percentage score

 

Reporting

External validity

Internal validity (bias)

Internal validity (confounding)

Power

Total

Question numbers

1–7, 9, 10

11–13

14, 15, 17–20

21–26

27

 

Maximum score

10

3

6

7

1

27 (%)

PAL studies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Grieco et al25

7

0

6

4

0

17 (63)

 Norris et al8

8

1

4

3

0

16 (59)

 Mullender-Wijnsma et al26

7

1

3

4

0

15 (56)

 Grieco et al30

7

1

4

2

0

14 (52)

 Lucht and Heidig24 (A)

7

1

2

3

0

13 (48)

 Lucht and Heidig24 (B)

7

1

2

3

0

13 (48)

 Graham et al28

6

1

1

3

0

11 (41)

 Mahar et al31

4

1

3

2

0

10 (37)

 Valle et al32

2

1

2

4

0

 9 (33)

 Humphrey29

3

1

1

3

0

 8 (30)

CMB studies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Schmidt et al33

9

0

4

4

1

18 (67)

 Howie et al34

9

0

4

4

0

17 (63)

 Howie et al35

9

0

3

5

0

17 (63)

 van den Berg et al36

9

0

4

2

0

15 (56)

 Kubesch et al37

8

0

3

3

0

14 (52)

 Ma et al38

6

0

3

3

1

13 (48)

 Hill et al39

5

1

4

2

0

12 (44)

 Ma et al40

6

0

3

2

0

11 (41)

  • CMB, classroom movement break; PAL, physically active learning.