Question or statement | HBM construct | RE-AIM* dimension(s) | n | Yes % (95% CI)† | No % (95% CI)† | Unsure % (95% CI)† | Agree % (95% CI)† | Neither agree nor disagree % (95% CI)† | Disagree % (95% CI)† |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Had you heard of the FIFA 11+ before taking part in this questionnaire? | Cues to action | R | 18 | 61 (54 to 68) | 39 (32 to 46) | 0 | |||
Does your team currently use the FIFA 11+? | Perceived benefit | R, A, M | 18 | 28‡ (22 to 36) | 61 (54 to 68) | 11 (6 to 16) | |||
Have you ever been in a team which used the FIFA 11+? | Perceived benefit | R, A | 13§ | 0§ | 69 (54 to 84) | 31 (16 to 46) | |||
Does the FIFA 11+ need to be improved for use in your team? | Perceived benefit | A, I, M | 17 | 78 (70 to 86) | 6 (2 to 10) | 17 (10 to 24) | |||
Should your club develop its own version of the FIFA 11+? | Cues to action | A, I, M | 17 | 100 | 0 | 0 | |||
The FIFA can prevent LL injuries in your team | Perceived benefit | E, A | 18 | 83 (77 to 89) | 17 (11 to 23) | 0 | |||
The FIFA 11+ is soccer specific | Perceived benefit | A, I, M | 18 | 50 (43 to 57) | 44 (37 to 51) | 6 (2 to 10) | |||
The FIFA 11+ is too long | Perceived barrier | A, I, M | 17 | 6 (2 to 10) | 35 (26 to 44) | 59 (50 to 68) | |||
The FIFA 11+ contains adequate variation and progression for our team | Perceived benefit | A, I, M | 17 | 22 (14 to 30) | 28 (20 to 36) | 50 (41 to 59) | |||
The FIFA 11+ could be maintained over multiple seasons by our team | Cues to action | A, I, M | 18 | 44 (37 to 51) | 17 (11 to 23) | 39 (32 to 46) |
*The Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework: R=reach, E=effectiveness, A=adoption, I=implementation, M=maintenance.
†In cases of 0% agreement, 95% CIs calculations returning (0–0) are left blank.
‡Sum of ‘yes’ (6%) and ‘yes, but modified’ (22%).
§Skip-logic was employed for the five respondents already using the FIFA 11+.
HBM, Health Belief Model; LL, lower limb; RE-AIM, Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance.