Theme | Statement | HBM construct | RE-AIM* dimension(s) | n | Agree % (95% CI)† | Neither agree nor disagree % (95% CI)† | Disagree % (95% CI)† |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Injury susceptibility and seriousness | Soccer players are at high risk of suffering a LL injury | Perceived susceptibility | A, M | 18 | 94 (90 to 98) | 6 (2 to 10) | 0 |
LL injuries can shorten a professional soccer player's career | Perceived seriousness | A, M | 18 | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
LL soccer injuries can cause physical problems later in life | Perceived seriousness | A, M | 18 | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
LL injuries have a negative impact on team performance | Perceived seriousness | A, M | 18 | 89 (84 to 94) | 11 (6 to 16) | 0 | |
LL injuries have a negative impact on a soccer player's quality of life | Perceived seriousness | A, M | 18 | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
Injury prevention exercise programmes | It is possible to prevent some LL soccer injuries | Perceived benefit | A, E | 18 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
Exercises which have been scientifically proven to prevent LL injuries should be performed by soccer players | Perceived benefit | A, M | 18 | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
Exercises to prevent injuries should be varied and progressed over time | Cues to action | A, I, M | 18 | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
Exercises which have been scientifically proven to prevent LL injuries should be incorporated into the club's training guidelines | Cues to action | M | 18 | 94 (90 to 98) | 6 (2 to 10) | 0 | |
Balance exercises can prevent LL injuries | Perceived benefit | E, A, I | 18 | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
Controlled jumping/landing can prevent LL injuries | Perceived benefit | E, A, I | 18 | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
Eccentric muscle strengthening can prevent LL injuries | Perceived benefit | E, A, I | 18 | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
A warm-up jog/run can prevent LL injuries | Perceived benefit | E, A, I | 18 | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
Cutting exercises can prevent LL injuries | Perceived benefit | E, A, I | 18 | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
Cool-down jog/run can prevent LL injuries | Perceived benefit | E, A, I | 18 | 61 (54 to 68) | 17 (11 to 23) | 22 (16 to 28) |
*Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework: E=effectiveness, A=adoption, I=implementation, M=maintenance.
†In cases of 0% and 100% agreement, 95% CIs calculations returning (0–0) or (100–100) are left blank.