Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Inconsistent anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) in rugby players: a source of injuries?
  1. Danping Wang1,2,
  2. Gael Mahe3,
  3. Junying Fang4,
  4. Julien Piscione5,
  5. Serge Couvet6,
  6. Didier Retiere5,
  7. Sébastien Laporte7,
  8. Pierre-Paul Vidal1,8
  1. 1 School of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Zhejiang, China
  2. 2 Plateforme d’étude de la Sensorimotricité, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
  3. 3 UFR de mathématiques et informatique–LIPADE, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
  4. 4 Faculté des sciences fondamentales et biomédicales, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
  5. 5 Fédération Française de rugby, Marcoussis, France
  6. 6 Thales Training and Simulation, Osny, France
  7. 7 LBM/Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak, Arts et Metiers ParisTech, Paris, France
  8. 8 COGNition and ACtion Group (COGNAC-G), Université Paris Descartes–CNRS UMR-MD–SSA, Paris, France
  1. Correspondence to Dr Danping Wang; danping.wang{at}parisdescartes.fr; Dr Danping Wang; danping.wang{at}parisdescartes.fr

Abstract

Background We are developing since 2010 with Thales and the Fédération Française de Rugby (FFR) M-Rex, a new kind of rugby scrum simulator. The study questioned whether it could improve safety and protect players from injury by using it as a tool for training/coaching the packs.

Aim To explore the anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) during the engagement of the ruck, because these predictive neck and back muscles contractions protect the spinal cord at the time of impacts, which is crucial to prevent injuries.

Methods We quantified the kinematics and the EMG activities in high-level front row players during their initial engagement, when scrummaging with M-Rex. All studies were performed with one player interacting with the robot, at first, and then with the three players acting together.

Results For most of the tested high-level players, the APA latencies were highly variable from trial to trial even though the engagement resulted in similar impacts. At time, the onset of the electromyography activity in the neck and back muscles showed latencies inferior to 50 ms or even close to zero prior to the impact , which rendered muscle contractions inefficient as APAs. We were also unable to identify clear muscular synergies underlying the APAs because of their great variability on a trial-to-trial basis. Finally, the APAs were not related to the amplitude of the ensuing impact and were asymmetric in most trials. All these characteristics held true, whether the player was playing alone or with two other frontline players.

Conclusion Our result suggest that APAs should be systematically tested in high-level rugby players as well as in any high-level sport men at risk of neck and back injuries. Because APAs can be efficiently trained, our study paves the way to design individual position-specific injury prevention programme.

  • rugby
  • injury
  • prevention
  • training

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors DW (research engineer): Assistance of coordination, recordings at the FFR, signal processing and drafted the Methods and Results sections. GM (associate professor): supervised signal processing and processed part of the signals. JF (Master’s student): helped to process the signals by writing software. JP (head of the scientific department of the FFR): coordinator of the recording sessions at the FFR centre, operator of the robot and participated in the interpretation of the data. SC (engineer): maker of the robot and technical supervisor to the recordings session. DR (technical director of the FFR): in charge of the scientific programme at the FFR. SL (professor): participation in the data interpretation. P-PV: coordination of the study, head of the group and drafted the Introduction and Discussion sections.

  • Funding This study was funded by Fédération Française de Rugby.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Ethics approval This study was approved by the FFR and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Patient consent Not required.